Table 5 Failure patterns and breach process for all test conditions.

From: Investigating the failure mechanisms of cascade landslide dams under overtopping conditions: an experimental approach

Test conditions

Qp (L/s)

tp (s)

Erosion characteristics

Failure patterns

Dam 1 in Test 1

13.34

90.2

1. Headcut erosion

2. Headward erosion

View full size image

Dam 1 in Test 4

13.38

82.1

Dam 3 in Test 4

12.93

318.9

Dam 1 in Test 5

13.39

90.7

Dam 1 in Test 6

13.39

91.4

Dam 2 in Test 6

12.84

330.2

Dam 1 in Test 2

16.62

72.3

1. Headcut erosion

2. Headward erosion

3. Upstream slope collapse

View full size image

Dam 2 in Test 2

16.25

202.7

Dam 3 in Test 6

12.67

532.1

Dam 2 in Test 1

12.65

261.3

1. Headcut erosion

2. Headward erosion

3. Upstream slope collapse

4. Downstream slope collapse

View full size image

Dam 3 in Test 1

12.56

392.5

Dam 3 in Test 2

15.51

304.2

Test 4, Dam 2

11.88

210.5

Test 5, Dam 2

12.72

290.1

Test 5, Dam 3

12

481.1

Test 3, Dam 1

19.2

61.8

1. Layer erosion

2. Upstream slope collapse

3. Downstream slope collapse

View full size image

Test 3, Dam 2

18.19

171.6

Test 3, Dam 3

17.07

253.5

  1. In the table, Qp denotes the peak flow rate at the breach, and tp denotes the time at which the peak flow rate occurs.