Table 5 Results of model path analysis.
Assumption | UnStd. | S.E. | C.R. | P | Std. (β) | R | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Task characteristics→Task–technology fit | 0.330 | 0.066 | 5.022 | *** | 0.337 | 0.520 | 0.270 |
Technology characteristics→Task–technology fit | 0.315 | 0.068 | 4.662 | *** | 0.309 | ||
Perceived usefulness→Students’ satisfaction | 0.207 | 0.057 | 3.618 | *** | 0.226 | 0.535 | 0.286 |
Perceived ease of use→Students’ satisfaction | 0.332 | 0.061 | 5.483 | *** | 0.355 | ||
Task–technology fit→Students’ satisfaction | 0.120 | 0.057 | 2.093 | 0.036 | 0.127 | ||
Students’ satisfaction→Continuance intention towards simulation software | 0.381 | 0.065 | 5.894 | *** | 0.368 | 0.595 | 0.354 |
Task–technology fit→Continuance intention towards simulation software | 0.370 | 0.063 | 5.886 | *** | 0.379 |