Table 1 Study characteristics.

From: The effects of social media abstinence on affective well-being and life satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study	Country	Duration of social media abstinence	Social media platform(s)	Type of social media abstinence	Outcome(s)	Outcome measure(s)	N	Sample	Inclusion criteria	Female (%)	M age	SD age	Range age	RoB assessment	Preregistration	Open data
Allcott et al.³⁰	United States of America	28 days	Facebook (Messenger was allowed)	All devices	Life Satisfaction	3 items from the SWLS	2,813	Community sample	US resident Born between 1900 and 2000 Use FB > 15 but < 600 min per day	57.6	32.5	11.9	Not reported	Fair	Yes	Available online
Fioravanti et al.³¹	Italy	7 days	Instagram	Smartphone Tablet	Positive Affect Negative Affect Life Satisfaction	PANAS SWLS	80	Students	Instagram account for at least one year Daily Instagram user 18 + years old	50.0	24.8	4.2	Not reported	Good	No	Not publicly available
Hall et al.¹⁶	USA	7, 14, 21, or 28 days	Facebook Twitter Snapchat Instagram	Not specified	Positive Affect Negative affect Quality of Day	4 items from the SF-36 3 items from Hughes et al.⁶¹ + 1 additional item 4 items adapted from the SWLS	130	Students Community sample	Not reported	78.5	26.8	11.4	18–68	Fair	Yes	Not publicly available
Hanley et al.¹⁷	Australia United States of America United Kingdom	7 days	Facebook Instagram	All devices	Positive Affect Negative Affect Life Satisfaction	PANAS Q-LES-Q-18	78	Adults	English-speaking 18–48 years old Android users	55.1	30.9	7.1	18–48	Fair	No	Not publicly available
Przybylski et al.⁴⁰	United States of America United Kingdom Hong Kong	1 day	All social media	Not specified	Positive Affect Negative Affect	PANAS	297	Students	Not reported	73.7	20.8	3.8	17–56	Fair	Yes	Available on OSF
Stieger and Lewetz¹⁹	Germany	7 days	All social media	All devices	Positive Affect Negative Affect	6 items from the I-PANAS-SF	152	Community sample	Adults	70.0	27.4	11.9	18–80	Fair	No	Not publicly available
Tromholt⁴³	Denmark	7 days	Facebook	Smartphone Tablet	Positive Affect Negative Affect Life Satisfaction	4 items from the PANAS 5 items from the CES-D Scale 1 item (“In general, how satisfied are you with your life today?”)	888	Community sample	Not reported	86.0^a	34^a	8.7^a	Not reported	Fair	No	Not publicly available
Vally and D’Souza⁴⁴	United Arab Emirates	7 days	All social media	Mobile devices	Positive Affect Negative Affect Life Satisfaction	PANAS SWLS	78	Students	Not reported	52.6	22.1	2.03	18–27	Good	No	Not publicly available
Vanman et al.⁴⁶	Australia	5 days	Facebook	Not specified	Positive Affect Negative Affect Life Satisfaction	PANAS SWLS	123	Community sample	Active Facebook users	63.0^a	22.4^a	Not reported	18-40^a	Good	No	Available on OSF
Wadsley and Ihssen²⁰	United Kingdom	6 days	All social media, except instant messaging apps	All devices	Positive Affect Negative Affect	6 items from the I-PANAS-SF	35	Students	18–25 years old iPhone users Using at least one SNS daily	68.6^a	19.9^a	1.16^a	18–25	Fair	Yes	Available on OSF

RoB risk of bias, OSF open science framework, PANAS positive and negative affect schedule, SWLS satisfaction with life scale, Q-LES-Q quality of life enjoyment and satisfaction questionnaire, I-PANAS-SF International positive and negative affect schedule short form, CES-D Scale center for epidemiologic studies depression scale.
^aTromholt⁴³, Vanman et al.⁴⁶, and Wadsley and Ihssen²⁰ reported age statistics and gender distribution for their initial sample, but not for their final sample.

Back to article page

Table 1 Study characteristics.

Search

Quick links