Table 1 Results from group-level analysis using TEST 2 for the connectivity measures. For each subject a mean of the pairwise connectivity values was obtained for each task. The p-values were then obtained using a permutation test comparing two different tasks across all the subjects. Significant p-values obtained after correcting for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni-Holm method are in bold.
From: A novel method for estimating functional connectivity from EEG coherence potentials
| Â | EC-EO | EC-PC | EC-WM | EO-PC | EO-WM | PC-WM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(\overline{CP}_\tau\) | 0.51 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.002 | 3e-5 |
\(\overline{CP}_{\tau _{min}}\) | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 0.006 |
\(\overline{CP}_{\tau _{max}}\) | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 1.2e-4 | 1.34e-5 |
\(\overline{CP}_{\lambda }\) | 0.04 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.2 |
\(\overline{PLV}\) (\(\alpha\)-band) | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.47 |
\(\overline{absCoh}\) (\(\alpha\)-band) | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.86 | 0.45 | 0.37 |
\(\overline{imCoh}\) (\(\alpha\)-band) | 0.27 | 0.054 | 0.75 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.11 |
\(\overline{MI}\) | 0.73 | 0.29 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 0.87 | 0.61 |