Table 2 Effect of nanoparticles of Y. schidigera at different doses of each extract (ml of extract /g dietary DM) on ruminal total gas production (ml/g DM) of diets with two dietary levels of protein compared with nanoparticles of chitosan (as positive control (PC)) and the crude extract using male bulls as a source of ruminal inoculum.

From: Influence of dietary protein levels on nano-encapsulated Yucca schidigera extract and its effects on in vitro ruminal greenhouse gas production and fermentation dynamics

Protein level (PRO, % of diet)

Type of extract (TE)

Extract dose (ED; mL/g DM)

Gas production

Gas production kineticsa

mL GP g−1 DM incubated

b

c

Lag

6 h

24 h

48 h

14

Without extract

0.00

242.57

0.0288

1.27

64.30

129.93

213.63

Nano-chitosan

0.25

337.33

0.0288

1.38

80.90

205.67

322.00

0.50

408.62

0.0276

2.89

89.00

264.43

432.10

1.00

378.30

0.0300

2.30

79.07

223.00

361.70

Crude extract

0.25

539.28

0.0213

0.36

114.17

249.40

518.17

0.50

472.07

0.0279

2.41

96.97

221.73

436.80

1.00

481.57

0.0281

2.01

132.40

290.20

456.47

Nano-extract

0.25

401.45

0.0296

2.46

75.93

209.73

377.80

0.50

425.02

0.0513

2.84

70.63

202.07

407.83

1.00

488.08

0.0312

5.42

80.27

218.47

456.50

SEMb

35.892

0.00703

0.774

8.881

21.946

42.023

TE

0.0018

0.1385

0.0155

< .0001

0.0740

0.0310

ED

0.7294

0.2999

0.0244

0.2898

0.4646

0.8124

TE × ED

0.2061

0.4248

0.2776

0.1996

0.1589

0.1824

18

Without extract

0.00

464.27

0.0292

3.98

81.87

212.77

432.00

Nano-chitosan

0.25

339.83

0.0275

0.89

81.93

197.93

321.73

0.50

335.60

0.0269

1.25

82.77

195.90

317.53

1.00

352.97

0.0269

2.60

96.90

218.23

334.97

Crude extract

0.25

445.68

0.0268

0.94

99.20

2296.67

414.50

0.50

500.20

0.0305

4.53

88.60

228.57

466.10

1.00

507.33

0.0291

3.05

101.77

245.37

472.93

Nano-extract

0.25

415.55

0.0291

4.73

76.83

204.83

388.53

0.50

455.85

0.0305

4.29

79.30

213.13

426.40

1.00

416.20

0.0275

1.44

88.37

222.70

390.17

SEMb

16.294

0.00055

0.653

4.473

6.519

14.367

TE

< .0001

0.0006

0.0063

0.002

< .0001

< .0001

ED

0.0751

0.0038

0.0848

0.0082

0.0039

0.0519

TE × ED

0.1642

0.0022

0.001

0.5252

0.8917

0.1241

Pooled SEM2

27.872

0.00499

0.716

7.031

16.188

31.403

p-value

      

PRO

0.0228

0.4599

0.0447

0.6492

0.4809

0.1136

TE

< .0001

0.0936

0.0007

< .0001

0.0033

< .0001

ED

0.2889

0.1832

0.0107

0.0168

0.0846

0.3540

PRO × TE

0.7511

0.1534

0.0808

0.0085

0.2430

0.6001

PRO × ED

0.7719

0.4294

0.0960

0.9342

0.9625

0.9702

TE × ED

0.7734

0.3067

0.0688

0.2256

0.2134

0.5838

PRO × TE × ED

0.0349

0.5087

0.0020

0.2226

0.1261

0.0378

  1. ab = asymptotic gas production (mL g−1 DM); c = rate of gas production (mL h−1); Lag = initial delay before gas production begins (h).
  2. b SEM = standard error of the mean. GP – Gas Production.