Table 2 An overview of fully-supervised and semi-supervised segmentation methods for comparison.
From: Siamese network with change awareness for surface defect segmentation in complex backgrounds
Fully-Supervised Methods | Semi-Supervised Methods |
---|---|
FCN66: utilizes fully convolutional layers to realize dense prediction for arbitrary-sized images. | DCT45: employs one network to ensure consistency across different views of a given sample. |
PSPNet67: Utilizes global context aggregation through pyramid pooling for complicated scene parsing. | CPS43: enforces consistency between two segmentation networks initialized differently. |
DeepLabV3+36: introduced the atrous spatial convolutional pyramid (ASPP) to enhance the multi-scale contextual information. | UAMT46: encourages consistent predictions under different perturbations and estimates uncertainty to learn from unlabeled data. |
DANet68: enhances segmentation by adaptively integrating semantic dependencies in spatial and channel dimensions via the self-attention mechanism. | UCC44: employs a shared encoder with dual decoders and enforces consistency between the decoders with data augmentations. |
OCRNet69: introduces object-contextual representations for semantic segmentation, leveraging pixel-object relationships to augment pixel representations. | UAPS5: dynamically blends pseudo-labels from multi-head outputs during a single forward pass for uncertainty regularization. |
SegFormer40: presents a streamlined semantic segmentation framework by integrating Transformers with lightweight MLP decoders. | Â |