Table 1 Patient characteristics and workflow metrics.

From: Impact of optimized and conventional facility designs on outpatient abdominal MRI workflow efficiency

Body Region

Metric

Optimized MRI Facility

Reference MRI Facility

OF vs. RF

(Difference, p-value)

Overall

 

n = 1640

n = 1083

 

Age (years)

60 (0.4)

63 (0.7)

p < 0.001

Male

80.3%

83.3%

p < 0.05

Patient Time Slots

30

45

-

Patient Arrival to Exam Start Time

28.7 (0.5)

37.7 (1.0)

-9.0 (-23.9%), p < 0.001

Liver

 

n = 694

n = 385

 

Male

53.4%

53%

p = 0.989

Acquisition Time

22.3 (0.2)

21.4 (0.3)

+ 0.9 (+ 4.2%), p < 0.05

Positioning Time

3.4 (0.1)

3.4 (0.1)

0.0 (0.0%), p = 0.999

Table Turnaround Time

4.9 (0.3)

7.9 (0.6)

-3.0 (-38%), p < 0.001

Total Process Cycle

30.6 (0.3)

32.7 (0.7)

-2.1 (-6.4%), p < 0.01

Prostate

 

n = 946

n = 698

 

Acquisition Time

25.5 (0.2)

25.3 (0.3)

+ 0.2 (+ 0.8%), p = 0.619

Positioning Time

2.8 (0.1)

2.5 (0.1)

+ 0.3 (+ 12%), p < 0.05

Table Turnaround Time

4.2 (0.3)

8.6 (0.6)

-4.4 (-51.2%), p < 0.001

Total Process Cycle

32.5 (0.3)

36.4 (0.6)

-3.9 (-10.7%), p < 0.001

  1. Differences in patient demographics and key workflow metrics for liver and prostate exams at both facilities (OF = Optimized Facility, RF = Reference Facility). All time values are presented in minutes as mean (SE).