Table 2 Antenna comparison with existing literature.
From: Enhanced isolation in aperture fed dielectric resonator MIMO antennas for 5G Sub 6 GHz applications
References | Frequency (GHz) | Gain (dBi) | Bandwidth (%) | Isolation (dB) | Efficiency (%) | ECC | CCL bits/s/Hz | DG (dB) | TARC (dB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.5, 5 | 7.67, 8.32 | 2.64, 1.2 | 20 | 88.0 | 0.037 | 0.2 | 9.99 | − 18.8 | |
86.3 | 7 | ||||||||
3.21–3.81 | 3.64 | 17 | 10 | 90 | < 0.02 | – | 9.9 | 20 | |
3.72–3.82, 4.65–4.76, 6.16–6.46 | 2.5 | 2.6, 2.3, 4.75 | 16 | 89 | < 0.1 | 0.2 | 9.8 | − 10 | |
3.20–5.8 | 3.5 | 58.56 | 17.5 | 85 | < 0.01 | 0.4 | 9.8 | – | |
4.9–5.725 | 4.8 | 28.8 | 15.4 | 70 | < 0.15 | – | 9.8 | –5 | |
5.2–5.7, 11.8–17.3 | 3.05, 5.27 | 9, 3.61 | 20 | 90 | < 0.007 | 0.4 | 9.96 | − 10 | |
5.29–6.12, 26–29.5 | 5.13, 5.6 | 15, 13 | 20 | 73 | < 0.04 | < 0.4 | 9.9 | – | |
2.37–5.85 | 4.0 | 84.12 | 17.5 | 85 | < 0.05 | – | 9.8 | − 10 | |
5.52–6.2 GHz | 5.12 | 10 | 15 | 91.5 | 0.050 | 0.40 | 7.5 | – | |
3.3–4.2 GHz | 8.8 | 8–15 | 15 | 92 | 0.045 | 0.35 | 8 | − 21 | |
3.3 GHz L-3.9 GHz | 5.8, 6.2 | 6 | 20 | 88.6,90 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 9.9 | -22.46 | |
3.4–3.8 GHz | 8 | 11.76% | > 22 | 90.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 7.2 | − 19.8 | |
Proposed design | 3.72, 4.75 | 9.12, 8.58 | 14.7, 11.57 | 20.38 21.86 | 88.9 | < 0.04 | < 0.6 | 9.9 | − 22 |
93.8 |
