Table 1 Summary of studies on social isolation in rat models.

From: Juvenile social isolation in Sprague Dawley rats does not have a lasting impact on social behavior in adulthood

 

Strain

Sex

Isolation

Rehousing

Behavioral outcomes (isolated compared to group housed rats)

Lukkes et al.26,73,77

SD

M

P21 to P42

Yes

Open field test—Reduced locomotion and fewer entries to center in adulthood

Free social interaction test—Increased social anxiety-like behaviors (increased latency for social approach, decreased number and duration of social contacts, and increased freezing behavior) in adulthood

Habituation to novel dark open field—No differences

Meng et al.27

SD

M

P21 to P48a

Yes

Open field test—Increased locomotor activity before but not after rehousing

Free social interaction—Increased social interaction before but not after rehousing

Weintraub et al.28

SD

M & F

P30 to P50

Yes

Elevated plus maze—Decreased anxiety-like behavior in males but not females

Lukkes et al.29

SD

F

P21 to P42

Yes

Social interaction—No difference

Habituation to novel dark open field—No difference

Baarendse et al.30

LS

M

P21 to P42

Yes

5-choice serial reaction time task—Disrupted impulse control

Delayed reward task—No difference

Rat gambling task—Impaired decision making

Tulogdi et al.31

W

M

P21 to P70b

Yes

Resident intruder test—No difference before rehousing but increased aggressive behavior after rehousing

Bator et al.32

WH

M

P30 to P40

Yes

Home cage social behavior during resocialization—Decreased social investigation and contact behavior but no difference in play behaviors

Locomotor activity using a fear conditioning chamber setup—No difference

Free social interaction—No difference

Novel object recognition test—No difference

Acoustic startle response test—No difference

Begni et al.33

LH

M

P21 to P58 or P21 to P101c

Yes

Open field test—Increased locomotor activity following isolation from P21-101; no differences following rehousing

Burrowing behavior—No differences following isolation from P21-101 or following rehousing

Kinley et al.34

LE

M & F

P21 to P42

Yes

Open field test—No differences

Social preference—Decreased social preference in males but not females

Light–dark box—Decreased anxiety-like behavior in males but not females

P Graf et al.35

W

M & F

P21 to P42

or

P42 to P63d

Yes

Open field test—No difference in distance traveled

Elevated plus maze—No difference in either sex

Novel object recognition task—No difference in either sex

Free social interaction—No differences following early adolescence isolation but decreased social interaction following late adolescence isolation in both sexes

Social recognition memory—Impaired social discrimination in both sexes following both early and late isolation

Hotplate test—Increased thermal pain sensitivity in male isolated rats and decreased thermal pain sensitivity in female isolated rats

Tanaka et al.36

LE

M & F

P23 to

P38—P48

No

Elevated plus maze—Increased anxiety-like behavior in males but not females

Social recognition test—Impairments in social recognition in both sexes

Wall et al.37

SD

M & F

P21 to

P49—P52

No

Free social interaction—Increased social interaction and aggressive grooming in both sexes

Seffer et al.38

W

M

P21 to P49

Yese

Exposure to acoustic stimuli (pro-social USV, alarm USV, or background noise) and subsequent arm entries on a radial arm—Lack of deficits in approach behavior seen specifically in response to pro-social USV following isolation from P21-P49 rescued by rehousing

Fontenot et al.39

SD

M & F

P21 to P49

No

Free social interaction—Increase in aggressive grooming behavior with no changes in non-aggressive social behavior in both sexes

Novoa et al.40

SD

M

P21 to P31

No

Open field test—Increased time in center and distance traveled in isolated rats

Elevated plus maze—Increased anxiety-like behavior (less time in open arms; more time in closed arms)

Potrebic et al.41

WH

M

P29 to P43f.

No

Three chamber test—Isolated rats showed increased approaches to social stimulus and more time spent more time in exploratory activity compared to GH rats at early adolescence (P36) but not at mid-adolescence (P43)

Douglas et al.42

SD

M & F

P23 to P38

or

P21 to P70g

No

Social conditioned placed preference (CPP) -– Isolated adolescent and adult rats demonstrated CPP while GH adult rats did not display CPP

Social behavior (play fighting, social investigation, social avoidance) tracked during social conditioned place preference -– Increased play fighting in adolescent but not adult rats; adult isolated rats spent more time engaging in social investigation than GH or adolescent isolated rats

Yorgason et al.43

LE

M

P28 to P77 or

P28 to P174

No

Elevated plus maze—Increased anxiety-like behavior in both age groups

Toyoshima et al.44

WI

M

P21 to P80

No

Social discrimination task—Isolated rats were able to discriminate novel conspecific amongst 3 different conspecifics while group-housed rats were unable to discriminate

Object discrimination task—No difference

Oliveira et al.45

W

M & F

P21 to P72

No

Resident intruder test—Increased aggression in both sexes

Elevated plus maze—No difference in either sex

Social preference test—No difference in both sex

Short-term social recognition memory/social discrimination test -– Impaired social discrimination in both sexes

Amiri et al.46

W

M

P21-28 to P77-84

No

Open field test—Increased locomotor activity

Free social interaction—Decreased social exploration behavior (rearing, anogenital sniffing, time spent with other rat)

Shirenova et al.47

W

F

P31 to 5.5 months

or

P35 to 9.5 monthsh

No

Open field test—Greater Increased locomotor activity (distance traveled) after 5.5 months of isolation

Elevated plus maze—Decreased exploratory risk assessments (head dips from the open arms) and less time spent in open arms after 2 months of isolation but not at other time points

Three chamber test—Increased preference for novel social stimulus and chamber containing novel social object in isolated rats at 9.5 months but not at 3 months

Free social interaction—Increased duration of social contact (including aggressive interaction) after 2 and 5 months of isolation but not after 8 months of SI

Harding et al.48

LE

M & F

P28 to P64

No

Open field test—No difference in male isolated rats.; Less distance traveled and time spent in center zone in female isolated rats

Elevated plus maze—No difference in either sex

Sociability test (novel rat vs. novel object)—Both male and female isolated rats displayed preference for social compared to the novel object stimulus (though difference in investigation time is not stated to be significantly different)

Novel object location test—No difference in either sex

  1. aTesting was performed on one cohort at P48 following isolation and at P76 following rehousing.
  2. bTesting was performed on one cohort at P70 following isolation and at P91 following rehousing
  3. cTesting was performed in two independent cohorts: one isolated from P21 to P58, followed by six weeks of rehousing, and another isolated from P21 to P101.
  4. dTesting was performed in two independent cohorts: one isolated from P21 to P42 and the other from P42 to P63.
  5. eTesting was performed in two independent cohorts: one isolated from P21 to P49 and another from P21 to P49, with the latter followed by one week of rehousing.
  6. fTesting was performed in two independent cohorts: one tested at P36, one week after isolation during early adolescence, and another tested at P43, two weeks after isolation during mid-adolescence.
  7. gTesting was performed in two independent cohorts: one tested at P38 during adolescence and another at P70 during adulthood.
  8. hTesting was performed in two independent cohorts: one isolated for 4.5 months and another isolated for 8.5 months