Table 1 Summary of related works.
Author | Objective | Methods | Advantages | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|---|---|
(Hennebelle et al. 2024)23 | DP via secured IOT with BC monitoring | Diabetes mellitus prediction model (DMPM) and Random Forest (RF) | Ensured data privacy by storing the diagnosed result in the BC | As the traditional consensus protocol and authentication scheme were utilized, the security was reduced |
(R. Huang et al. 2022)25 | Diabetes management model | Delay-aware resource allocation (RA) and deep forest algorithm (DFA) | Effectively transmitted the data and attained high diabetes classification accuracy | The network collision was not avoided, leading to higher access delays |
(Prabhakar et al. 2024)26 | Type 2 DP and diet plan recommendation | Decision Tree, support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN) | Attained higher scalability and prediction accuracy | Required higher memory and was computationally complex |
(Razfar et al. 2023)24 | Smart post-stroke assessment in the wearable device | Multi-Level Meta Learner (MLML) ensemble classifier | Computational efficiency was better | As only the upper body movement was concentrated, the misclassification rate was higher |
(Mahesh et al. 2022)27 | DP model | Bayesian networks and radial basis functions | DP accuracy was higher | The blending of base learners caused higher processing time |
(Allen et al. 2021)28 | Forecasting disease progression in stroke patients | Digital twin and variational-autoencoder | Improved clinical decision-making | The dataset was small and the generalization was reduced |
(Annamalai & Nedunchelian 2021)22 | Diabetes mellitus prediction and severity estimation | Switching midvalue-centric morphological filter (SMVMF) and optimal weighted Deep artificial neural network (OWDANN) | Diabetes was classified with high efficiency | The severity level estimation was poor due to the unstable score values |
(Lu & Wang 2022)29 | Ischemic stroke prediction | Back propagation (BP) network and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) | The ischemic stroke was detected with high accuracy | As the number of iterations increased, the training time also increased |
(Elbagoury et al. 2023)30 | Stroke prediction via smart hospital platform | Convolutional neural network (CNN), group handling method (GMDH), and long short term memory (LSTM) | Obtained higher stroke prediction accuracy | The variation of the signal channel led to more memory usage and computational complexity |
(Krishnamoorthi et al. 2023)31 | Diabetes healthcare disease prediction | Logistic regression (LR) | The error rate was minimized | The hyper-parameter selection was degraded due to the random sample distribution |
(Rastogi & Bansal 2023)32 | DP model | KDD, RF, SV, logistic regression, and Naive Bayes | Improved accuracy in DP | Missing values in the data reduced the performance |
(Zhou et al. 2023)33 | Diabetes identification model | Boruta, K-Means +  + , and ensemble classifier | DP precision was higher | The absence of data imbalance led to improper classified output |
(Al Reshan et al. 2024)34 | DL clinical decision-making regarding DP | ETC, ANN, CNN, and LSTM | Higher accuracy in DP | The model was complex and slowed the DP |
(Sai et al. 2023)35 | Prediction of diabetes | LGB and adaptive boosting | Attained higher processing time | Reduction in proper decision-making |
(Chee et al. 2024)36 | Detection of diabetes | CNN + LSTM | Lowered computational complexity | The misclassification rate was higher |