Table 13 Performance evaluation of the proposed MCAM model in three randomized experiments on the testing dataset. The best-achieved values are in bold, while the second-highest values are underlined. The top values are individually highlighted in bold and underlined for normal and abnormal categories. (\(\bullet\) indicates the used channels) [Values in %].

\(\bullet\)

N

98.96

98.14

98.36

98.24

98.57

98.69

99.70

98.67

98.78

A

98.52

98.27

98.11

98.67

98.42

98.57

98.94

98.24

98.77

98.70 ± 0.27

\(\bullet\)

N

98.12

98.51

98.35

98.34

98.62

98.47

98.62

98.15

98.12

A

98.42

98.61

98.39

98.27

98.34

98.09

98.57

98.36

98.09

98.22 ± 0.09

\(\bullet\)

N

98.32

98.21

98.47

98.42

98.57

98.31

98.25

98.47

98.51

A

98.22

98.34

98.27

98.48

98.25

98.31

98.44

98.15

98.25

98.41 ± 0.31

\(\bullet\)

\(\bullet\)

N

99.21

99.67

99.78

99.08

99.67

99.67

98.54

99.68

98.54

A

99.08

99.27

99.67

98.92

99.15

99.08

98.52

99.08

98.67

98.72 ± 0.27

\(\bullet\)

\(\bullet\)

N

99.42

99.58

99.39

98.78

99.02

98.72

99.25

99.68

98.76

A

99.75

99.28

99.63

98.80

99.08

98.72

98.79

99.09

98.90

99.80 ± 0.40

\(\bullet\)

\(\bullet\)

N

98.68

98.32

98.57

98.78

98.24

98.35

98.92

98.47

98.05

A

98.54

98.25

98.47

98.62

98.34

98.67

98.91

98.15

98.15

98.60 ± 0.22

\(\bullet\)

\(\bullet\)

\(\bullet\)

N

99.70

99.48

99.58

98.32

98.69

98.67

99.72

99.47

99.07

A

99.72

99.29

99.50

98.21

98.72

98.47

98.92

99.52

99.18

98.89 ± 0.26