Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92596-3, published online 05 March 2025

The original version of this Article contained an error in the Results and Discussions section where the in-text reference to Fig. 10 was incorrect.

“On the other hand, the NEP decreases exponentially from 3.6 × 10–14 to 5.6 × 10–14 W with applied reverse bias voltage varying from –5.0 to 0 V according to the Fig. 10. expression \({\text{A}}_{2}+{\text{A}}_{3}{e}^{\left(-\frac{\text{V}}{{t}_{2}}\right)}\) with R2 = 0.94. Here A2, A3, and t2 are the fitted parameters.”

now reads:

“On the other hand, the NEP decreases exponentially from 3.6 × 10–14 to 5.6 × 10–14 W with applied reverse bias voltage varying from –5.0 to 0 V according to the expression \({\text{A}}_{2}+{\text{A}}_{3}{e}^{\left(-\frac{\text{V}}{{t}_{2}}\right)}\) with R2 = 0.94. Here A2, A3, and t2 are the fitted parameters.”

The original Article has been corrected.