Fig. 3 | Scientific Reports

Fig. 3

From: A neural network model for the evolution of reconstructive social learning

Fig. 3

Evolutionary trajectories and alternative outcomes of evolution. Four replicate simulations illustrate that the co-evolution of individual and social learning can lead to markedly different outcomes. Evolutionary trajectories are coloured as indicated in the colour spectrum to the right: from dark blue in the initial generations to dark red towards the end of the simulation. The four trajectories all start with 20 learning episodes and a proportion of social learning of 0.5 (marked by a dark blue cross). After 20 K generations (dark red part of the trajectories), learning was lost in replicate (A), pure individual learning had evolved in replicate (B), and a learning strategy combining about 20% of social learning with 80% of individual learning had evolved in replicate (C). Replicate (D) illustrates that social learning, after having been lost initially, can later be regained, in this example resulting in a combination of 25% social learning and 75% individual learning. The legend to the right provides guidelines on how to interpret the simulation outcomes: ‘no learning’ if the evolved number of learning episodes is very low; ‘pure individual learning (IL)’ if the evolved proportion of social learning is very low; ‘pure social learning (SL)’ if the proportion of social learning is close to 1.0; and ‘combined individual and social learning (IL/SL)’ if the proportion of both types of learning is intermediate. The simulations were run for the same scenario as in Fig. 8, which will be discussed in detail later.

Back to article page