Table 3 Comparison of subjective evaluation of image quality, diagnostic confidence, and grading of infrapopliteal vessels in three groups.

From: Improving lower-extremity artery depiction and diagnostic confidence using dual-energy technique and popliteal artery monitoring in dual-low dose CT angiography

 

Group A (n = 45)

Group B (n = 45)

Group C (n = 45)

Statistics

P value

Subjective image quality

 AIS* score

Reader 1

5 (3.5)

5 (3.5)

5 (3.5)

4.99

0.082

Reader 2

5 (3.5)

5 (3.5)

5 (3.5)

4.68

0.096

 Kappa

 

0.933

0.908

0.927

  

 FPS* score

Reader 1

5 (2.5)

5 (4.5)

5 (4.5)

17.71

< 0.001ab

Reader 2

5 (2.5)

5 (4.5)

5 (4.5)

19.79

< 0.001ab

 Kappa

 

0.775

0.726

0.895

  

 LKS* score

Reader 1

3 (1.5)

4 (3.5)

5 (4.5)

76.15

< 0.001abc

Reader 2

3 (1.5)

4 (3.5)

5 (4.5)

76.2

< 0.001abc

 Kappa

 

0.897

0.896

0.911

  

 LKS*Vascular grading

Reader 1

3 (1.5)

4 (1.5)

5 (3.5)

45.73

< 0.001bc

Reader 2

3 (1.5)

4 (1.5)

5 (3.5)

46.81

< 0.001bc

 Kappa

 

0.962

0.952

0.965

  

Diagnostic confidence

 AIS*score

Reader 3

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

0.51

0.774

Reader 4

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

0.29

0.861

 Kappa

 

0.656

0.656

0.789

  

 FPS* score

Reader 3

3 (1.3)

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

2.14

0.334

Reader 4

3 (1.3)

3 (2.3)

3 (2.3)

0.78

0.675

 Kappa

 

0.902

0.656

0.845

  

 LKS* score

Reader 3

2 (1.3)

3 (1.3)

3 (2.3)

51.24

< 0.001abc

Reader 4

2 (1.3)

3 (1.3)

3 (2.3)

56.46

< 0.001abc

 Kappa

 

0.942

0.967

0.789

  
  1. *AIS abdominal iliac segment, FPS femoral popliteal segment, LKS lower knee segment.
  2. aP < 0.05 for comparison of groups A and B.
  3. bP < 0.05 for comparison of groups A and C.
  4. cP < 0.05 for comparison of groups B and C.
  5. Data in median (minimum, maximum).