Table 10 Summary of main findings of the augmentation effect of collaborating with ChatGPT for Study 4, Task 1 performance.

From: Human-generative AI collaboration enhances task performance but undermines human’s intrinsic motivation

DV

Word Count

Analytical Content

Positive Tone

Condition

Solo-Solo

Solo-Collab

Collab-Solo

Collab-Collab

Solo-Solo

Solo-Collab

Collab-Solo

Collab-Collab

Solo-Solo

Solo-Collab

Collab-Solo

Collab-Collab

Mean

91.43

93.83

150.16

162.7

69.97

69.75

76.35

77.62

7.43

7.37

8.08

7.79

SD

45.91

52.18

68.72

65.84

22.35

21.15

17.8

14.2

3.88

3.86

3.37

3.06

Mean

92.58

157.30

69.86

77.07

7.40

8.02

SD

49.00

67.34

21.77

15.85

3.87

3.20

t (df)

22.10 (1459.77)

7.64 (1503.29)

3.53 (1580.71)

p

< 0.001

< 0.001

< 0.001

95% CI

[58.97, 70.46]

[5.36, 9.06]

[0.28, 0.97]

Cohen’s d

1.10

0.38

0.17

  1. DV = dependent variable, SD = standard deviation, CI = confidence interval, Cohen’s d is the standardized effect size. Comparisons were conducted between participants who worked solo in Task 1 (i.e., the Solo-Solo and Solo-Collab conditions) and participants who collaborated with AI in Task 1 (i.e., the Collab-Solo and Collab-Collab conditions). T-tests were used to evaluate mean differences for each dependent variable. Significant results are bolded for emphasis.
Back to article page