Table 3 Comparative performance analysis of all perovskite tandem solar cell designs.
Top subcell (wide bandgap material) | Bottom subcell (narrow bandgap material) | JSC (mA/cm2) | VOC (V) | FF (%) | PCE (%) | Type of work/references |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MA 0.9Cs0.1Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 | MASn0.5Pb0.5I3 | 12.7 | 1.98 | 73 | 18.4 | Experimental work64 |
FA0.6Cs0.3DMA0.1PbI2.4Br0.6 | FA 0.75Cs0.25Sn 0.5Pb0.5I3 | 16 | 1.88 | 77 | 23.1 | Experimental work65 |
FAMASnGeI3 | CH3NH3GeI3 | 28.36 | 1.07 | 84.46 | 26.7 | Experimental work66 |
Cs2AgBi0.75Sb0.25Br6 | CH3NH3SnI3 | 15.55 | 1.94 | 68.48 | 24.8 | Experimental work67 |
FA0.8 Cs 0.2 Pb(I0.62Br0.38)3 | FA0.7MA0.3Pb0.5Sn0.5I 3 | 16.5 | 2.03 | 79.9 | 26.7 | Experimental work68 |
FA0.8Cs0.2Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 | FA0.7MA0.3Pb0.5Sn0.5I3 | 15.6 | 2.02 | 79.5 | 25.1 | Experimental work69 |
CsPbI2Br | CsPb0.4Sn0.6I3:GLE | 28.86 | 0.82 | 73.66 | 17.4 | Experimental work70 |
Cs0.4FA0.6PbI1.95Br1.05 | Cs0.05MA0.45FA0.5Pb0.5Sn0.5 I3 | 15.2 | 2.03 | 80 | 24.6 | Simulation work71 |
MAGeI3 | FASnI3 | 14.70 | 2.63 | 80 | 30.8 | Simulation work72 |
MAGeI3 | K2PtBr6 | 16.42 | 1.96 | 70.19 | 24.3 | Simulation work73 |
CsPb0.75Sn0.25IBr2 | Cs2TiI6 | 16.84 | 2.18 | 86.97 | 31.9 | This work |
