Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A TODIM based decision-making framework using intuitionistic double hierarchy linguistic terms for evaluating polymer absorbing algae in marine debris management
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2026

A TODIM based decision-making framework using intuitionistic double hierarchy linguistic terms for evaluating polymer absorbing algae in marine debris management

  • Mehwish Tahir1,
  • Ahmed M. Zidan2,
  • Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed3,
  • Ahmed A. Hamoud4,
  • Syed Inayat Ali Shah1 &
  • …
  • Saleem Abdullah5 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 233 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Environmental sciences
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

This study proposes a novel multiple-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) approach for addressing marine debris caused by the excessive use of synthetic materials. The method integrates the intuitionistic double hierarchy linguistic term set (IDHLTS) with the TODIM framework to enhance decision-making under uncertainty. The IDHLTS combines the features of double hierarchy linguistic term sets with intuitionistic fuzzy sets, thereby capturing both membership and non-membership information to represent expert judgments more accurately. To aggregate decision information effectively, Hamacher operational rules and aggregation operators are employed due to their flexible, parametric nature. Furthermore, transformation functions, score functions, and distance measures are formally defined, and their mathematical properties are analyzed to ensure reliability. The TODIM method is incorporated to account for decision makers’ behavioral preferences, particularly loss aversion. To illustrate its practical relevance, a real-world case study is conducted to identify the most effective algal species for the remediation of synthetic debris in marine ecosystems. Microalgae are emphasized for their ability to decompose polymers through enzymatic and bioactive secretions, converting them into smaller fragments and assimilating the released carbon as a nutrient source. By applying the proposed MCGDM framework, environmentally sustainable algae with minimal ecological disruption are identified. Comparative analysis using classical approaches to MCDM, such as TOPSIS, weighted sum model (WSM), three-way decision (TWD), and grey relational analysis (GRA), it appears that despite slight variations in the intermediate ranking, all approaches find the same best and worst alternatives. It is notable that the proposed IDHLTS-TODIM approach encompasses more discrimination between alternatives by using the group decision-making structure, and the loss aversion behavior, which are not sufficiently considered by the benchmark approaches. The sensitivity analysis at various settings of the parameters also supports the stability and soundness of the ranking results. Sensitivity analysis further validates the feasibility, robustness, and stability of the proposed method. The findings demonstrate practical value of the approach, providing policymakers, environmental researchers, and marine conservationists with a systematic decision-support tool for implementing algae-based bioremediation strategies to mitigate synthetic marine debris.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Arora, Y., Sharma, S. & Sharma, V. Microalgae in bioplastic production: a comprehensive review. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 48(6), 7225–7241 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ethiraj, S. & Samuel, M. S. A comprehensive review of the challenges and opportunities in microalgae-based wastewater treatment for eliminating organic, inorganic, and emerging pollutants. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 60, 103316 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghernaout, B., Ghernaout, D. & Saiba, A. Algae and cyanotoxins removal by coagulation/flocculation: A review. Desalin. Water Treat. 20(1–3), 133–143 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Gao, B. Y. & Yue, Q. The removal efficiency and reaction mechanism of aluminum coagulant on organic functional groups-carboxyl and hydroxyl. Chem. Eng. J. 211, 186–194 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Iwuozor, K. O. Prospects and challenges of using coagulation-flocculation method in the treatment of effluents. Adv. J. Chem. Sect. A 2(2), 105–127 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sabiri, N. E., Castaing, J. B., Massé, A. & Jaouen, P. Performance of a sand filter in removal of micro-algae from seawater in aquaculture production systems. Environ. Technol. 33(6), 667–676 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simpson, D. R. Biofilm processes in biologically active carbon water purification. Water Res. 42(12), 2839–2848 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Su, L. et al. Creep characterisation and microstructural analysis of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash geopolymer backfill. Sci. Rep. 14(1), 29828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81426-7 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang, W., Yang, L. & Bu, Y. Research on the Identification and Classification of Marine Debris Based on Improved YOLOv8. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 12(10), 1748. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101748 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peng, S. et al. Enhanced assessment of chlorophyll-a and total nitrogen dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicle-based model and hyperspectral imagery in coastal wetland water. Environ. Technol. Innov. 40, 104521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104521 (2025).

  11. Li, Z., Li, G., Song, X. & Wang, X. An Efficient and Dynamic Framework for Multi-Scale Target Detection of Underwater Organisms. J. Ocean Univ. China https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-026-6062-9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, K. et al. Deciphering the ammonia transformation mechanism of a novel marine multi-stress-tolerant yeast, Pichia kudriavzevii HJ2, as revealed by integrated omics analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 91(6), e0221124. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02211-24 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zadeh, L. A., Klir, G. J., & Yuan, B. Fuzzy sets, fuzzy logic, and fuzzy systems: selected papers (Vol. 6). World scientific. (1996)

  14. Atanassov, K. T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: theory and applications 1–137 (Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaur, P., & Priya, A. Selection of inventory policy under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Science & Technology Asia, pp. 62–71 (2020).

  16. Kaur, S. & Gupta, S. K. A fuzzy-based framework for evaluation of website design quality index. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 22(1), 15–47 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy languages and their relation to human and machine intelligence. In Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, And Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers by Lotfi A Zadeh (pp. 148–179) (1996).

  18. Liu, D., Cheng, Y. & Peng, D. The multiple interacting fuzzy linguistic set and its application in emergency decision making. Expert Syst. Appl. 245, 123100 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Morente-Molinera, J. A., Wu, X., Morfeq, A., Al-Hmouz, R. & Herrera-Viedma, E. A novel multi-criteria group decision-making method for heterogeneous and dynamic contexts using multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling and consensus measures. Inf. Fusion 53, 240–250 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gou, X., Liao, H., Xu, Z. & Herrera, F. Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and MULTIMOORA method: A case of study to evaluate the implementation status of haze controlling measures. Inf. Fusion 38, 22–34 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, X., Xu, Z. & Wang, H. Three-way decisions based on some Hamacher aggregation operators under double hierarchy linguistic environment. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(12), 7731–7753 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fu, Z. & Liao, H. Unbalanced double hierarchy linguistic term set: The TOPSIS method for multi-expert qualitative decision making involving green mine selection. Inf. Fusion 51, 271–286 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krishankumar, R., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M. & Ravichandran, K. S. Prioritization of zero-carbon measures for sustainable urban mobility using integrated double hierarchy decision framework and EDAS approach. Sci. Total Environ. 797, 149068 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hamacher, H. Über logische Verknüpfungen unscharfer Aussagen und daren zugeharige Bewertungs-functionene, Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research Vol. m. ed. by Trappl, R. and Klir, GJ and Riccardi, L, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 276, 288 (1979).

  25. Wang, W. & Liu, X. Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(5), 923–938 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, W. & Liu, X. Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 26(11), 1049–1075 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, Q., Wu, P., Zhou, L., Chen, H., & Guan, X. Some new Hamacher aggregation operators under single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic environment and their applications to multi-attribute group decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 116, 144–162 (2018).

  28. Kaur, P., Dutta, V., Pradhan, B. L., Haldar, S. & Chauhan, S. A Pythagorean fuzzy approach for sustainable supplier selection using TODIM. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 4254894. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4254894 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lourenzutti, R. & Krohling, R. A. TODIM based method to process heterogeneous information. Proc. Comput. Sci. 55, 318–327 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Savari, M. & Khaleghi, B. Analysis of psychological and social factors affecting climate change adaptation and mitigation behaviors among Iranian rice farmers. Sci. Rep. 15, 30431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30431 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Savari, M., Ghezi, M. & Molavi, H. Encouraging low-water-use crops: Behavioral drivers and policy recommendations for sustainable water management. Environ. Sustain. Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100711 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tosun, Ö. & Akyüz, G. A fuzzy TODIM approach for the supplier selection problem. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8(2), 317–329 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, P. & You, X. Probabilistic linguistic TODIM approach for multiple attribute decision-making. Granul. Comput. 2, 333–342 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wu, Q., Liu, X., Qin, J., Wang, W. & Zhou, L. A linguistic distribution behavioral multi-criteria group decision making model integrating extended generalized TODIM and quantum decision theory. Appl. Soft Comput. 98, 106757 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, X., Gou, X., & Xu, Z. A continuous interval-valued double hierarchy linguistic GLDS method and its application in performance evaluation of bus companies. Appl. Intell. 1-16 (2022).

  36. Dutta, V., Haldar, S., Kaur, P. & Gajpal, Y. Comparative analysis of TOPSIS and TODIM for the performance evaluation of foreign players in Indian Premier League. Complexity 2022(1), 9986137. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9986137 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, P. et al. Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy-based TODIM approach using evidential theory. Inf. Sci. 547, 223–243 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, Y., Tariq, M., Khan, S. & Abdullah, S. Complex dual hesitant fuzzy TODIM method and their application in Russia-Ukraine war’s impact on global economy. Complex Intell. Syst. 10(1), 639–653 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tang, J., Liu, X. & Wang, W. Consensus-based generalized TODIM approach for occupational health and safety risk analysis with opinion interactions. Appl. Soft Comput. 150, 111093 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, K., Zhou, L., Dai, X. & Li, H. Stochastic group preference acceptability analysis for interval-valued multiplicative preference relations based on TODIM method. Appl. Soft Comput. 151, 111140 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zheng, X., Wang, H., & Dai, J. A reliability analysis method for industrial robots based on double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and TODIM (2023).

  42. Wang, Z., Wei, G. & Guo, Y. TODIM method based on the CRITIC method for multi-attribute group decision making with dual probabilistic linguistic information. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 43(6), 7261–7276 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Satchanska, G., Davidova, S. & Petrov, P. D. Natural and synthetic polymers for biomedical and environmental applications. Polymers 16(8), 1159 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, J. et al. Amoxicillin degradation and high-value extracellular polymer recovery by algal-bacterial symbiosis systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 460, 132344 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Iakovidou, G. et al. Application of microalgae to wastewater bioremediation, with CO2 biomitigation, health product and biofuel development, and environmental biomonitoring. Appl. Sci. 14(15), 6727 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. El-Sheekh, M. M., El-Kassas, H. Y. & Ali, S. S. Microalgae-based bioremediation of refractory pollutants: an approach towards environmental sustainability. Microb. Cell Fact. 24(1), 19 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mogany, T., Bhola, V. & Bux, F. Algal-based bioplastics: global trends in applied research, technologies, and commercialization. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31(26), 38022–38044 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schmuck, J. et al. Chlorella vulgaris-mediated Bioremediation and Valorization of Urban Wastewater, from a circular economy approach. J. Appl. Phycol. 37(3), 1795–1813 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hadiyanto, H., Joelyna, F. A., Khoironi, A., Sudarno, S., Safaat, J. A., Pratama, W. D., & Nur, M. M. A. Harnessing Chlorella vulgaris-Aspergilus niger Interactions for Effective Microplastic Removal in Aquatic Ecosystems. Waste Biomass Valor. 1-17 (2025).

  50. Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L. & Herrera, F. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gou, X. & Xu, Z. Double hierarchy linguistic term set and its extensions: the state-of-the-art survey. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(2), 832–865 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Oussalah, M. On the use of Hamacher’s t-norms family for information aggregation. Inf. Sci. 153, 107–154 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao, H., Xu, Z. & Liu, S. Dual hesitant fuzzy information aggregation with Einstein t-conorm and t-norm. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 26, 240–264 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99-127) (2013).

  55. Ahmad, M. T., Shariff, M., Yusoff, Md. F., Goh, Y. M., & Banerjee, S. Applications of microalga Chlorella vulgaris in aquaculture. Rev. Aquacult. 12(1), 328–346 (2020).

  56. Jouanno, J. et al. Socio-ecological vulnerability assessment to Sargassum arrivals. Sci. Rep. 15(1), 9998 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Steinhagen, S. et al. Harvest time can affect the optimal yield and quality of sea lettuce (Ulva fenestrata) in a sustainable sea-based cultivation. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 816890 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Almeida, Â., Cotas, J., Pereira, L., & Carvalho, P. Potential role of Spirogyra sp. and Chlorella sp. in bioremediation of mine drainage: A review. Phycology, 3(1), 186–201 (2023).

  59. Ye, J. Two effective measures of intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Computing 87(1), 55–62 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kumar, K. & Chen, S. M. Group decision making based on weighted distance measure of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method. Inf. Sci. 611, 660–676 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Li, X., Xu, Z. & Wang, H. Three-way decisions based on some Hamacher aggregation operators under double hierarchy linguistic environment. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(12), 7731–7753 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through large group Research Project under grant number RGP.2/51/46.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Islamia College University, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Mehwish Tahir & Syed Inayat Ali Shah

  2. Department of Mathematics, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 61413, Saudi Arabia

    Ahmed M. Zidan

  3. Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraydah, 51452, Saudi Arabia

    Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed

  4. Department of Mathematics, Taiz University, Taiz, 6803, Yemen

    Ahmed A. Hamoud

  5. Department of Mathematics, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan

    Saleem Abdullah

Authors
  1. Mehwish Tahir
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed M. Zidan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed A. Hamoud
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Syed Inayat Ali Shah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Saleem Abdullah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mehwish Tahir, Ahmed M. Zidan, Abdulkafi Mohammed Saeed, Ahmed A. Hamoud,Syed Inayat Ali Shah, and Saleem Abdullah, contributed equally to the conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing, and revision of this manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed A. Hamoud.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tahir, M., Zidan, A.M., Saeed, A.M. et al. A TODIM based decision-making framework using intuitionistic double hierarchy linguistic terms for evaluating polymer absorbing algae in marine debris management. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37057-1

Download citation

  • Received: 29 October 2025

  • Accepted: 19 January 2026

  • Published: 14 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37057-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Intuitionistic double hierarchy linguistic term set
  • Hamacher aggregation operators
  • Multi criteria group decision making
  • TODIM
  • Prospect theory
  • Low-impact algae
  • Synthetic debris
  • Polymer-absorbing algae
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics