Abstract
Tendinopathy is a common musculoskeletal condition that impairs body function and quality of life. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy is a widely used non-invasive treatment method. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of radial shockwave therapy (RSWT) and focused shockwave therapy (FSWT) in the treatment of upper and lower limb tendinopathies, based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pain intensity, physical function, muscle strength, and adverse effects. The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD420251011209. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase was conducted to identify RCTs. Databases were searched from their inception until the last update—26 March 2025 for PubMed, EBSCOhost and Ovid MEDLINE, and 27 March 2025 for Embase. Review methods: Risk ratios and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. The risk of bias and methodological quality of the included studies were evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. The overall quality of the body of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Of the 102 records identified, 9 articles met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 530 patients with upper or lower limb tendinopathy. No clear superiority of RSWT or FSWT was observed for pain or functional outcomes, owing to low or very low certainty of evidence. Moderate-quality evidence indicated that RSWT significantly improved wrist extensor strength in patients with tennis elbow compared to FSWT (MD: 1.81; 95% CI 0.97 to 2.64; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%), while grip strength did not differ significantly between the modalities (MD: 0.57; 95% CI −1.68 to 2.82; p = 0.62; I2 = 0%). Both treatments were similarly safe, but conclusions are limited by low-quality evidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Scott, A. et al. ICON 2019: International scientific tendinopathy symposium consensus: Clinical terminology. Br. J. Sports Med. 54, 260–262 (2020).
Cook, J. L. & Purdam, C. R. Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy. Br. J. Sports Med. 43, 409–416 (2009).
Palermi, S. et al. The challenge of thigh tendon reinjuries: An expert opinion. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 35, 335–345 (2024).
Tarantino, D. et al. Achilles tendon pathologies: How to choose the best treatment. 15, (2020).
Novak, P. Physics: F-SW and R-SW. Basic information on focused and radial shock wave physics. In Multidisciplinary Medical Applications. (eds. Lohrer, H. & Gerdesmeyer, L.) 28–49 (Level 10 Buchverlag Daniela Bamberg, 2015).
Ogden, J. A., Tóth-Kischkat, A. & Schultheiss, R. Principles of shock wave therapy. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200106000-00003 (2001).
Mittermayr, R., Haffner, N., Feichtinger, X. & Schaden, W. The role of shockwaves in the enhancement of bone repair - from basic principles to clinical application. Injury 52, S84–S90 (2021).
Al-Abbad, H. et al. The effects of shockwave therapy on musculoskeletal conditions based on changes in imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 21, 1–26 (2020).
Li, C. et al. Effectiveness of focused shockwave therapy versus radial shockwave therapy for noncalcific rotator cuff tendinopathies: A randomized clinical trial. Biomed Res. Int. 2021, 6687094 (2021).
Stania, M. et al. A comparative study of the efficacy of radial and focused shock wave therapy for tennis elbow depending on symptom duration. Arch. Med. Sci. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2019.81361 (2020).
van der Worp, H., Zwerver, J., Hamstra, M., van den Akker-Scheek, I. & Diercks, R. L. No difference in effectiveness between focused and radial shockwave therapy for treating patellar tendinopathy: A randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 22, 2026–2032 (2014).
Majidi, L., Khateri, S., Nikbakht, N., Moradi, Y. & Nikoo, M. R. The effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy on pain in patients with various tendinopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. BMC Sports Sci. Med. Rehabil. 16, 93 (2024).
Charles, R., Fang, L., Zhu, R. & Wang, J. The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Immunol. 14, 1193835 (2023).
Elgendy, M. H., Khalil, S. E. D., ElMeligie, M. M. & Elazab, D. R. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in treatment of upper and lower limb tendinopathies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiother. Res. Int. 29, e2042 (2024).
Yoon, S. Y., Kim, Y. W., Shin, I. S., Moon, H. I. & Lee, S. C. Does the type of extracorporeal shock therapy influence treatment effectiveness in lateral epicondylitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 478, 2324–2339 (2020).
Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, (2021).
de Morton, N. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: A demographic study. Aust. J. Physiother. 55, 129–133 (2009).
Liao, C. D., Tsauo, J. Y., Chen, H. C. & Liou, T. H. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lower-limb tendinopathy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 97, 605–619 (2018).
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997).
Sterne, J. A. C. et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366, (2019).
Guyatt, G. H. et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336, 924–926 (2008).
Kaplan, S., Sah, V., Ozkan, S., Adanas, C. & Delen, V. Comparative effects of focused and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapies on lateral epicondylitis: A randomised sham-controlled trial. J. Coll. Phys. Surg. Pak. 33, 554–559 (2023).
Abo Al-Khair, M. A. et al. Focused, radial and combined shock wave therapy in treatment of calcific shoulder tendinopathy. Phys. Sportsmed. 49, 480–487 (2021).
Król, P. et al. Focused and radial shock wave therapy in the treatment of tennis elbow: A pilot randomised controlled study. J. Hum. Kinet. 47, 127 (2015).
Maher, H. H. F., Kamel, R. M., Ahmed, H. H. & Shehata, S. Focused extracorporeal versus Radial shock wave therapy in treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis (randomized control trial). J. Adv. Pharm. Educ. Res. 8, 68–76 (2018).
Şah, V., Delen, V. & Şah Adress, V. The efficacy of large-focused and controlled-unfocused (Radial) extracorporeal shock wave therapies in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy: A randomized sham-controlled single-blind trial. Int. J. Curr. Med. Biol. Sci. 3, 38–44 (2023).
Akınoğlu, B. et al. Radial versus focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy in lateral epicondylitis: Acute effects on pain, muscle strength, upper extremity function, and quality of life. Turkish J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 71, 19–27 (2025).
Furia, J. High-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy as a treatment for insertional achilles tendinopathy. Am. J. Sports Med. 34, 733–740 (2006).
Taylor, J. et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for refractory Achilles tendinopathy: A prospective audit with 2-year follow up. Foot (Edinb). 26, 23–29 (2016).
Pinitkwamdee, S., Laohajaroensombat, S., Orapin, J. & Woratanarat, P. Effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of chronic insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int. 41, 403–410 (2020).
Wheeler, P. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy plus rehabilitation for insertionaland noninsertional achilles tendinopathy shows good results across a range of domains of function. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 58, 617–622 (2019).
Yan, B., Wan, Y., Zhang, H., Pan, M. & Zhou, C. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for patients with chronic achilles tendinopathy in long or short course. Biomed Res. Int. 2020(1), 7525096 (2020).
Zwerver, J. et al. No effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy in jumping athletes during the competitive season: A randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Sports Med. 39, 1191–1199 (2011).
Notarnicola, A. & Moretti, B. The biological effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (eswt) on tendon tissue. Muscles. Ligaments Tendons J. 2, 33–37 (2012).
Wang, C. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 7(1), 11 (2012).
Wang, C. et al. Shock wave therapy induces neovascularization at the tendon-bone junction. A study in rabbits. J. Orthop. Res. 21, 984–989 (2003).
Chao, Y. et al. Effects of shock waves on tenocyte proliferation and extracellular matrix metabolism. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34, 841–852 (2008).
Frairia, R. & Berta, L. Biological effects of extracorporeal shock waves on fibroblasts. A review. Muscles. Ligaments Tendons J. 1, 138–147 (2012).
Vetrano, M. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy promotes cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of primary cultured human tenocytes. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 19, 2159–2168 (2011).
Sukubo, N., Tibalt, E., Respizzi, S., Locati, M. & D’Agostino, M. Effect of shock waves on macrophages: A possible role in tissue regeneration and remodeling. Int. J. Surg. 24, 124–130 (2015).
Waugh, C. et al. In vivo biological response to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in human tendinopathy. Eur. Cell. Mater. 29, 268–280 (2015).
Khan, K., Cook, J., Taunton, J. & Bonar, F. Overuse tendinosis, not tendinitis part 1: A new paradigm for a difficult clinical problem. Phys. Sportsmed. 28, 38–48 (2000).
Kosek, E. et al. Chronic nociplastic pain affecting the musculoskeletal system: Clinical criteria and grading system. Pain 162, 2629–2634 (2021).
Nijs, J., Malfliet, A. & Nishigami, T. Nociplastic pain and central sensitization in patients with chronic pain conditions: a terminology update for clinicians. Brazilian J. Phys. Ther. 27(3), 100518 (2023).
Nijs, J. et al. Nociplastic pain criteria or recognition of central sensitization? pain phenotyping in the past, present and future. J. Clin. Med. 10(15), 3203 (2021).
Yarnitsky, D. Conditioned pain modulation (The diffuse noxious inhibitory control-like effect): Its relevance for acute and chronic pain states. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 23, 611–615 (2010).
Tedeschi, R., Platano, D., Donati, D. & Giorgi, F. Functional approaches in tendinopathy rehabilitation: Exploring the role of tendon neuroplastic training. Man. Medizin 63, 177–183 (2025).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Academy of Physical Education in Katowice for supporting this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, writing—original draft; MP: data curation, writing—reviewing & editing; MB: data curation, writing—reviewing & editing; AD: data curation, writing—reviewing & editing; ZH: data curation, writing—reviewing & editing; DB: data curation, writing—reviewing & editing; JK: conceptualization, supervision, data curation, writing—reviewing & editing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The study has been performed in accordance with the human and ethical research principles. Ethical approval is not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stania, M., Pawłowski, M., Benduch, M. et al. Efficacy of radial and focused shockwave therapy for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37160-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37160-3
