Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Positive ascites cytology in interval debulking surgery predicts poor outcomes of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer achieving complete tumor resection
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 February 2026

Positive ascites cytology in interval debulking surgery predicts poor outcomes of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer achieving complete tumor resection

  • Marina Yoshikawa1,2,
  • Masato Yoshihara1,
  • Ryo Emoto3,
  • Shigeyuki Matsui3 &
  • …
  • Hiroaki Kajiyama1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 308 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Gastroenterology
  • Oncology

Abstract

Positive ascites cytology is a known poor prognostic factor in ovarian cancer, but its impact after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with complete tumor resection remains unclear. Among 4944 patients, 191 underwent primary debulking surgery (PDS) and 59 underwent NAC followed by interval debulking surgery (NAC-IDS), all achieving R0 resection at stage III. Kaplan–Meier, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. Positive ascites cytology was independently associated with higher recurrence and mortality at 5 years [odds ratio (OR) of recurrence at 5 years = 2.412, P = 0.003; OR of mortality at 5 years = 2.025, P = 0.010]. Subgroup analysis showed greater risk in NAC-IDS than in PDS [NAC-IDS: HR of PFS = 2.003, P = 0.029; HR of OS = 3.259, P = 0.006; PDS: HR of PFS = 1.549, P = 0.031; HR of OS = 1.789, P = 0.018]. The interaction effect analysis suggested that positive ascites cytology was associated with a higher risk of mortality at 5 years in NAC patients than in PDS patients [OR of NAC-IDS = 3.722, OR of PDS = 1.151, OR for interaction = 3.234]. The present results indicate that positive ascites cytology in NAC-IDS predicts poor survival outcomes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

A large-scale multi-institutional study evaluating prognostic aspects of positive ascites cytology and effects of therapeutic interventions in epithelial ovarian cancer

Article Open access 26 July 2021

Multicenter randomised trial of two versus three courses of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Article 09 February 2022

Osteopontin promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through inducing JAK2/STAT3/NOX1-mediated ROS production

Article Open access 13 April 2022

Data availability

The clinical datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy and institutional ethical restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74(3), 229–263 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Cancer Research Center. Cancer Statistics in Japan. [cited 2025 May 14]. Available from: https://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/stat/cancer/19_ovary.html

  3. Enomoto, T. The 59th annual report of gynecologic oncology committee. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 80, 1372–1444 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berek, J. S., Renz, M., Kehoe, S., Kumar, L. & Friedlander, M. Cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: 2021 update. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 155, 61–85 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vergote, I. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363(10), 943–953 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knisely, A. T. et al. Trends in primary treatment and median survival among women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer in the US From 2004 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open. 3(9), e2017517 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshihara, M. et al. A large-scale multi-institutional study evaluating prognostic aspects of positive ascites cytology and effects of therapeutic interventions in epithelial ovarian cancer. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 15154 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nagasaka, K. et al. Positive peritoneal cytology at interval surgery is a poor prognostic factor in patients with stage T3c advanced ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective study. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 41(5), 755–762 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iura, A. et al. Negative peritoneal washing cytology during interval debulking surgery predicts overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 29(5), e70 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology; Ovarian Cancer including Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary Peritoneal Cancer, Version 1. 2017. [cited 2025 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp

  11. Komiyama, S. et al. Japan society of gynecologic oncology guidelines 2015 for the treatment of ovarian cancer including primary peritoneal cancer and fallopian tube cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 21(3), 435–446 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suzuki, S. et al. Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in ovarian clear cell carcinoma patients?. Ann. Oncol. 19(7), 1284–1287 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rustin, G. J. et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 21(2), 419–423 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Selvin, S. Statistical Analysis of Epidemiologic Data 249–250 (Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mogi, K. et al. Ovarian cancer-associated mesothelial cells: Transdifferentiation to minions of cancer and orchestrate developing peritoneal dissemination. Cancers 13(6), 1352 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gao Q, Yang Z, Xu S, Li X, Yang X, Jin, et al. Heterotypic CAF-tumor spheroids promote early peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer. J Exp Med. 216(3), 688–703 (2019).

  17. Matte, I. et al. Mesothelial cells interact with tumor cells for the formation of ovarian cancer multicellular spheroids in peritoneal effusions. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 33(8), 839–852 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshihara, M. et al. Ovarian cancer-associated mesothelial cells induce acquired platinum-resistance in peritoneal metastasis via the FN1/Akt signaling pathway. Int. J. Cancer. 146(8), 2268–2280 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Angeles, M. A. et al. Impact of pattern of recurrence on post-relapse survival according to surgical timing in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 33(1), 50–56 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: We sincerely thank members belonging to TOTSG-affiliated institutions for collaborating in data collection. We are grateful to E. Miyamoto, A. Kunishima, H. Fujimoto, S. Iyoshi and K. Mogi for helpful discussions. We would like to thank Medical English Service (www.med-english.com) for English language editing. This work was supported by a fellowship of the “Nagoya University CIBoG WISE program” from MEXT, and THERS Make New Standards Program for the Next Generation Reseaerchers” from JST SPRING, Grant Number JPMJSP2125.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine 65, Tsuruma-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

    Marina Yoshikawa, Masato Yoshihara & Hiroaki Kajiyama

  2. Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adelaide Medical School, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

    Marina Yoshikawa

  3. Department of Biostatistics, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan

    Ryo Emoto & Shigeyuki Matsui

Authors
  1. Marina Yoshikawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masato Yoshihara
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ryo Emoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shigeyuki Matsui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hiroaki Kajiyama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Marina Yoshikawa: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing-original draft Masato Yoshihara (Corresponding Author): Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Writing-review&editing Ryo Emoto: Methodology, Validation Shigeyuki Matsui: Methodology, Supervision, Validation Hiroaki Kajiyama: Funding acquisition, Supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masato Yoshihara.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1.

Supplementary Information 2.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshikawa, M., Yoshihara, M., Emoto, R. et al. Positive ascites cytology in interval debulking surgery predicts poor outcomes of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer achieving complete tumor resection. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37664-y

Download citation

  • Received: 16 October 2025

  • Accepted: 23 January 2026

  • Published: 10 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37664-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Neoplasms
  • Carcinoma
  • Ovarian epithelial
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Ascites
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer