Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Dynamic quality aware path planning for 6 DoF robotic arms using BiRRT and metaheuristic optimization based on B spline paths
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 February 2026

Dynamic quality aware path planning for 6 DoF robotic arms using BiRRT and metaheuristic optimization based on B spline paths

  • Abdelrahman T. Elgohr1,2,
  • Maher Rashad3,
  • Eman M. El-Gendy4,
  • Waleed Shaaban5 &
  • …
  • Mahmoud M. Saafan4,6 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Industrial robotic arms utilized in contemporary industrial and collaborative environments must operate within increasingly congested and dynamically restricted workspaces while adhering to rigorous standards of safety, precision, and motion quality. This paper presents a two-stage framework for path planning and optimization of a 6-DOF industrial robotic arm navigating amid randomly distributed obstacles. A collision-free reference motion is initially created by integrating B-spline geometric interpolation with a bidirectional RRT-Connect planner, augmented by short-cutting and effective joint-space collision verification for a KUKA KR 4 R600 manipulator. The baseline trajectory is subsequently enhanced through two metaheuristic optimizers: a Whale Genetic hybrid algorithm (WGA) and the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO). These optimizers minimize a composite objective that incorporates end-effector trajectory length, joint-level energy consumption based on established motor characteristics, and trajectory smoothness measured by joint jerk. Simulation results indicate that, while the raw Bi-RRT trajectory is geometrically efficient and energy-efficient, it demonstrates excessively high jerk. The suggested enhancements based on WGA and GWO diminish the jerk index of the original Bi-RRT solution by roughly 94–96%, resulting in relatively slight increases in trajectory length and energy, while producing dynamically smooth, collision-free trajectories that adhere to all kinematic constraints. This work presents a comprehensive, implementation-ready methodology that compares sampling-based planning, and multi-objective metaheuristic optimization to produce executable, energy-efficient, and jerk-minimized motions for industrial manipulators in intricate environments.

Data availability

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Luo, L. et al. Collision-free path-planning for Six-DOF serial harvesting robot based on energy optimal and artificial potential field, Complexity, 1–12, 2018, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563846

  2. Gasparetto, A., Boscariol, A., Lanzutti & Vidoni, R. Path planning and trajectory planning algorithms: a general overview. Mech. Mach. Sci. 29, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14705-5_1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flores, F. G. & Kecskeméthy, A. Time-optimal path planning along specified trajectories. In Multibody System Dynamics, Robotics and Control (eds Gattringer, H. & Gerstmayr, J.) 1–16 (Springer Vienna, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1289-2_1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fang, S., Ma, X., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Q. & Li, Y. Trajectory planning for seven-DOF Robotic Arm Based on Quintic Polynormial, in Proceedings – 2019 11th International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics, IHMSC 2019, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 198–201. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IHMSC.2019.10142

  5. Mei, J., Zhang, F., Zang, J., Zhao, Y. & Yan, H. Trajectory optimization of the 6-degrees-of-freedom high-speed parallel robot based on B-spline curve. Sci. Prog. 103 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850419880115 (2020).

  6. Liu, H., Chen, X. & Li, C. Path Planning Optimization for Obstacle Avoidance in Unknown Environment, in 2024 36th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), IEEE, May 5601–5606. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC62350.2024.10588054

  7. Mousa, M. A. A., Elgohr, A. & Khater, H. Path planning for a 6 DoF robotic arm based on Whale optimization algorithm and genetic algorithm. J. Eng. Res. 7 (5), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.21608/erjeng.2023.237586.1256 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cao, M., Mao, H., Tang, X., Sun, Y. & Chen, T. A novel RRT*-Connect algorithm for path planning on robotic arm collision avoidance. Sci. Rep. 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87113-5 (2025).

  9. Yang, J., Lyu, M. & Zhang, J. Robotic arm path planning under static obstacles based on improved Informed RRT* algorithm, in 2024 36th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), IEEE, May 5466–5470. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC62350.2024.10587619

  10. Elgohr, A. T., Elhadidy, M. S., El-geneedy, M., Akram, S. & Mousa, M. A. A. Advancing Sign Language Recognition: A YOLO v.11-Based Deep Learning Framework for Alphabet and Transactional Hand Gesture Detection, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, 6, 1, 209–217, (2025). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v6i1.36055

  11. Elgohr, A. T. et al. The intelligence behind robotic arms: A deep dive into control evolution. J. Rob. Control (JRC). 6 (3), 1478–1501. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v6i3.25604 (May 2025).

  12. Hassan, O. H. et al. Performance Evaluation of a Standalone Solar-Powered Irrigation System in Desert Regions Using PVsyst: A Comprehensive Analysis, in 2024 25th International Middle East Power System Conference (MEPCON), IEEE, 1–6. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON63025.2024.10850121

  13. Mousa, M. A. A., Elgohr, A. T. & Khater, H. A. A novel hybrid deep neural network classifier for EEG emotional brain signals. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 15 (6). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.01506107 (2024).

  14. Elgohr, A. T., Khater, H. A. & Mousa, M. A. A. Trajectory optimization for 6 DOF robotic arm using WOA, GA, and novel WGA techniques. Results Eng. 25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104511 (2025).

  15. Hashemi, A. B. & Meybodi, M. R. Cellular PSO: A PSO for dynamic environments, 422–433. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04843-2_45

  16. Mousa, M. A. A., Elgohr, A. T. & Khater, H. A. Trajectory optimization for a 6 DOF robotic arm based on reachability time. Annals Emerg. Technol. Comput. 8 (1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.33166/AETiC.2024.01.003 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mousa, M. A. A., Elgohr, A. T. & Khater, H. A. Whale-Based trajectory optimization algorithm for 6 DOF robotic arm. Annals Emerg. Technol. Comput. (AETiC). 8 (4), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.33166/AETiC.2024.04.005 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boscariol, A., Gasparetto, & Scalera, L. Path planning for special robotic operations. In Robot Design: from Theory To Service Applications (eds Carbone, G. & Laribi, M. A.) 69–95 (Springer International Publishing, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11128-0_4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ugwoke, K. C., Nnanna, N. A. & Abdullahi, S. E. Y. Simulation-based review of classical, heuristic, and metaheuristic path planning algorithms. Sci. Rep. 15 (1, 12643, ). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96614-2 (2025).

  20. Wu, G., Wang, B., Qiu & Han, Y. A path planning and trajectory optimization method for robotic manipulators in industrial scenes with frame Obstacles. Symmetry (Basel). 17 (1, 1, ). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17010001 (2024).

  21. Wu, Y. et al. Robotic Arm Motion Planning for Obstacle Avoidance Based on the CMN-RRT * Method, in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), IEEE, 1–6. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO58561.2023.10354552

  22. Chen, Y. & Lin, H. Reconstructed informed RRT*algorithm for robotic manipulator trajectory planning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3080 (1, 012190, ). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3080/1/012190 (2025).

  23. Yu, Y. H. & Zhang, Y. T. Collision avoidance and path planning for industrial manipulator using slice-based heuristic fast marching tree. Robot Comput. Integr. Manuf. 75 (102289). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102289 (2022).

  24. Wu, B., Wu, X., Hui, N. & Han, X. Trajectory planning and singularity avoidance algorithm for robotic arm obstacle avoidance based on an improved fast marching tree. Appl. Sci. 14 (8, 3241, ). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14083241 (2024).

  25. Gai, S. N., Sun, R., Chen, S. J. & Ji, S. 6-DOF Robotic Obstacle Avoidance Path Planning Based on Artificial Potential Field Method, in 2019 16th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR), IEEE, 165–168. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/URAI.2019.8768792

  26. Tang, X., Zhou, H. & Xu, T. Obstacle avoidance path planning of 6-DOF robotic arm based on improved A* algorithm and artificial potential field method. Robotica 42 (2), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574723001546 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yao, Z., Gan, Y., Han, Z., Gao, H. & Li, A. An obstacle avoidance path planning algorithm for manipulator in deep crate Grasping, in 2023 China automation Congress (CAC), IEEE, 4715–4720. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC59555.2023.10451398

  28. Liu, W. et al. Study on Remote Operation Obstacle Avoidance of Robotic Arm by Fusing APF and RRT Algorithms, in 2024 IEEE 14th International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), IEEE, 1–6. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBER63482.2024.10748898

  29. Cesar Velez-Lopez, G. et al. Collision-Free path planning applied to Multi-Degree-of-Freedom robotic arms using homotopy methods. IEEE Access. 12, 150702–150718. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3479095 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Elgohr, A. T., Kasem, H. M. & Elhadidy, M. S. Comparative analysis of robotic arms path planning techniques: case study of the KUKA KR4 R600 using the Whale optimization algorithm. Int. J. Intell. Robot Appl. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41315-025-00501-y (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yan, C., Zhang, J., Lv, M., Gu, J. & Yahya, K. A Sampling-Based motion planning strategy for robotic manipulators in highly dynamic workspaces. Adv. Transdisciplinary Eng. https://doi.org/10.3233/ATDE250696 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou, X., Wang, X., Xie, Z., Li, F. & Gu, X. Online obstacle avoidance path planning and application for Arc welding robot. Robot Comput. Integr. Manuf. 78 (102413). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102413 (2022).

  33. Li, N., Gao, Z., Ouyang, Y. & Zeng, Y. Obstacle-Avoiding path planning for robotic manipulators based on recursive segmentation point migration optimization and progressive inverse kinematics. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 22, 20876–20890. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2025.3604604 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kano, H. & Fujioka, H. B-Spline Trajectory Planning with Curvature Constraint, in Annual American Control Conference (ACC), IEEE, 2018, 1963–1968. (2018). https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2018.8431703

  35. Huo, F., Zhu, S., Dong, H. & Ren, W. A new approach to smooth path planning of ackerman mobile robot based on improved ACO algorithm and B-spline curve. Rob. Auton. Syst. 175, 104655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2024.104655 (May 2024).

  36. Zhang, Y. et al. An obstacle avoidance path planning and evaluation method for intelligent vehicles based on the B-Spline algorithm. Sensors 23, 19, (8151). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198151 (2023).

  37. Elazab, M. A., Elbrashy, A., Elgohr, A. T. & Hussein, A. H. Innovative electrode design and catalytic enhancement for high-efficiency hydrogen production in renewable energy systems. Energy Sour. Part A Recover. Utilization Environ. Eff. 47 (1), 9394–9412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2025.2490800 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, M. et al. A path planning algorithm for three-dimensional collision avoidance based on potential field and B-spline boundary curve. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 144 (108763). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2023.108763 (2024).

  39. Wang, J. et al. Obstacle-Avoidance Path-Planning algorithm for autonomous vehicles based on B-Spline algorithm. World Electr. Veh. J. 13, 12, (233). https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13120233 (2022).

  40. Zhang, M. et al. Path planning of the robotic manipulator based on an improved Bi-RRT. IEEE Sens. J. 24 (19), 31245–31261. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3441622 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhuo, Z., Haiyan, H. & Miaomiao, Z. Obstacle Avoidance Path Planning for a 6-DOF Manipulator Based on Improved RRT Algorithm, in 2023 19th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNC-FSKD), IEEE, 1–7. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNC-FSKD59587.2023.10280813

  42. Shi, W., Wang, K., Zhao, C. & Tian, M. Obstacle avoidance path planning for the Dual-Arm robot based on an improved RRT algorithm. Appl. Sci. 12 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084087 (2022).

  43. Liu, Z., Sampurno, R. M., Abeyrathna, R. M. R. D., Nakaguchi, V. M. & Ahamed, T. Development of a Collision-Free path planning method for a 6-DoF orchard harvesting manipulator using RGB-D camera and Bi-RRT algorithm. Sensors 24 (24). https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248113 (2024).

  44. Garg, D. & Kumar, M. Optimization techniques applied to multiple manipulators for path planning and torque minimization. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 15, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(02)00067-2 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bouhalassa, L., Benchikh, L., Ahmed-Foitih, Z. & Bouzgou, K. Path planning of the manipulator arm FANUC based on soft computing techniques. Int. Rev. Automatic Control (IREACO). 13 (4, 171, ). https://doi.org/10.15866/ireaco.v13i4.18506 (2020).

  46. Mirjalili, S. & Lewis, A. The Whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 95, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 (May 2016).

  47. Chhillar, A. & Choudhary, A. Mobile Robot Path Planning Based Upon Updated Whale Optimization Algorithm, in 2020 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence), 684–691. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/Confluence47617.2020.9058323

  48. Wang, T. et al. Optimal Trajectory Planning of Grinding Robot Based on Improved Whale Optimization Algorithm, Math Probl Eng, 3424313, 2020, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3424313

  49. Lim, S. M., Sultan, A. B. M., Sulaiman, M. N., Mustapha, A. & Leong, K. Y. Crossover and mutation operators of genetic algorithms. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. 7 (1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmlc.2017.7.1.611 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ziamanesh, S., Salimi, H. S., Tavana, A. & Ghavifekr, A. A. Parameter Tuning of Discontinues Lyapunov Based Controller Based on the Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm Applied to a Robotic Manipulator, in 2022 8th Iranian Conference on Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems (ICSPIS), IEEE, 1–6. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPIS56952.2022.10043942

  51. Ratiu, M. & Adriana Prichici, M. Industrial robot trajectory optimization- a review, in MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712602005

  52. Gunantara, N. A review of multi-objective optimization: methods and its applications. Cogent Eng. 5 (1, 1502242, ). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242 (2018).

  53. Al-Omari, A. et al. The role of automated technologies and industrial mechanisms in upgrading photovoltaic panel performance. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-025-03257-y (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kaur, M., Yanumula, V. K. & Sondhi, S. Trajectory planning and inverse kinematics solution of Kuka robot using COA along with pick and place application. Intell. Serv. Robot. 17, 2, 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-023-00501-6 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Elhadidy, M. S., Abdalla, W. S., Abdelrahman, A. A., Elnaggar, S. & Elhosseini, M. Assessing the accuracy and efficiency of kinematic analysis tools for six-DOF industrial manipulators: the KUKA robot case study. AIMS Math. 9 (6), 13944–13979. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2024678 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Elgohr, A. T. et al. Particle swarm optimization vs. whale optimization algorithm for robotic arm path planning: A controlled study on the KUKA KR4 R600. Results Eng. 28 (108299). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108299 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Horus University (Egypt) for its explicit support throughout this research and for providing access to KUKA robotic arm used in the case study. Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechatronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Abdelrahman T. Elgohr

  2. Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Horus University, New Damietta, 34517, Egypt

    Abdelrahman T. Elgohr

  3. Production Engineering and Mechanical Design Department, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt

    Maher Rashad

  4. Computers Engineering and Control Systems Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Eman M. El-Gendy & Mahmoud M. Saafan

  5. Mechanical Engineering Department, Mansoura University, El-Mansoura, 35516, Egypt

    Waleed Shaaban

  6. Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura National University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Mahmoud M. Saafan

Authors
  1. Abdelrahman T. Elgohr
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maher Rashad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eman M. El-Gendy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Waleed Shaaban
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mahmoud M. Saafan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Abdelrahman T. Elgohr conceptualized and designed the overall research framework, implemented the Bi-RRT with short-cutting and metaheuristic optimization, and performed the simulations. Maher Rashad contributed to the development of the optimization framework, integrating joint energy and jerk minimization strategies and providing expertise in mathematical modeling. Eman M. El-Gendy focused on B-spline time-parameterized trajectory generation, performance metrics design, and simulation analysis. Waleed Shaaban implemented the inverse kinematics solutions, integrated collision checking, and refined the optimization procedures. Mahmoud M. Saafan conducted the comparative analysis with related studies, assessing the advantages and limitations of the proposed method and optimizing robot motion dynamics. All authors contributed to the conceptualization, modeling, implementation, and revision of the manuscript, and approved the final version for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelrahman T. Elgohr.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All applicable institutional and national guidelines were followed.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all the co-authors of this publication.

Software

MATLAB software was used as a platform for modeling robotic arms and implementing the proposed algorithms.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elgohr, A.T., Rashad, M., El-Gendy, E.M. et al. Dynamic quality aware path planning for 6 DoF robotic arms using BiRRT and metaheuristic optimization based on B spline paths. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37676-8

Download citation

  • Received: 02 December 2025

  • Accepted: 23 January 2026

  • Published: 22 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37676-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Path planning
  • Bi-RRT
  • B-spline
  • Metaheuristic optimization
  • WGA
  • GWO
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics