Abstract
Aggregation operators constitute the core mathematical mechanism of multi-criteria decision-making by integrating multiple attribute evaluations into a single representative assessment. However, in intuitionistic fuzzy environments characterized by uncertainty, vagueness, and human hesitation, many existing aggregation operators inadequately capture nonlinear interactions among criteria and often weaken the influence of hesitancy information during aggregation. This paper examines the role of Yager-based aggregation mechanisms in preserving the structural integrity of intuitionistic fuzzy information and improving decision reliability under ambiguous conditions. A comprehensive family of Yager-based intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators is developed for multi-attribute decision-making problems, including weighted, ordered weighted, hybrid weighted averaging, and corresponding geometric operators. The principal advantage of the proposed operators lies in their flexible control of conjunction and disjunction behaviour through Yager’s t-norm and t-conorm, which enables a more balanced treatment of truth, indeterminacy, and falsity degrees compared with existing approaches. The system achieves logical stability through its core axiomatic properties which include idempotency and monotonicity and boundedness and commutativity. The framework shows stable ranking results which produce understandable outputs that identify differences between options during the selection process of eco-friendly companies in green supply chain management. The results show that Yager-based intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation creates a strong decision-support system which helps users make sustainable choices in complicated industrial ecosystems.
References
Zadeh, L. A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965).
Atanassov, K. T. & Stoeva, S. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986).
Pei, Z. & Zheng, L. A novel approach to multi-attribute decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 2560–2566 (2012).
Xu, Z. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(6), 1179–1187 (2007).
Xu, Z. & Yager, R. R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen Syst 35(4), 417–433 (2006).
Wei, G. W. Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision making in the intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Int J Uncertain, Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 17(02), 179–196 (2009).
Feng, L., Chuan-Qiang, F. & Wei-He, X. Type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Inf Eng 10(2), 1–11 (2018).
Naim, S. & Hagras, H. A type 2-hesitation fuzzy logic based multi-criteria group decision making system for intelligent shared environments. Soft. Comput. 18(7), 1305–1319 (2014).
Simić, V., Soušek, R. & Jovčić, S. Picture fuzzy MCDM approach for risk assessment of railway infrastructure. Mathematics 8(12), 2259 (2020).
Özlü, Ş & Sezgin, A. Soft covered ideals in semigroups. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Math. 12(2), 317–346 (2020).
Özlü, Ş. Multi-criteria decision making based on vector similarity measures of picture type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets. Granul Comput 8(6), 1505–1531 (2023).
Alcantud, J. C. R., Khameneh, A. Z. & Kilicman, A. Aggregation of infinite chains of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to choices with temporal intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf. Sci. 514, 106–117 (2020).
Wei, G. Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 10(2), 423–431 (2010).
Zhao, X. & Wei, G. Some intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37, 472–479 (2013).
Huang, J. Y. Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(1), 505–513 (2014).
Deschrijver, G., Cornelis, C. & Kerre, E. E. On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12(1), 45–61 (2004).
Deschrijver, G. & Kerre, E. E. A generalization of operators on intuitionistic fuzzy sets using triangular norms and conorms. Notes on Intuit Fuzzy Sets 8(1), 19–27 (2002).
Li, D.-F. Multiattribute decision making method based on generalized OWA operators with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(12), 8673–8678 (2010).
Radhakrishnan, S. & Thankachan, B. Single-valued neutrosophic multiple sets and its application in multi-criteria decision-making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 86(1), 20 (2025).
Deli, I. & Şubaş, Y. A ranking method of single valued neutrosophic numbers and its applications to multi-attribute decision making problems. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 8(4), 1309–1322 (2017).
Karaaslan, F. & Hunu, F. Type-2 single-valued neutrosophic sets and their applications in multi-criteria group decision making based on TOPSIS method. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 11(10), 4113–4132 (2020).
Özlü, Ş. Generalized Dice measures of single valued neutrosophic type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 14(1), 33–62 (2023).
Liu, P., Liu, J. & Chen, S.-M. Some intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. J Op Res Soc 69(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0190-y (2018).
Kaur, G. & Garg, H. Multi-attribute decision-making based on Bonferroni mean operators under cubic intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Entropy 20(1), 65 (2018).
Muneeza, G., Abdullah, S., Qiyas, M. & Khan, M. A. Multi-criteria decision making based on intuitionistic cubic fuzzy numbers. Granul Comput 7(1), 217–227 (2022).
Rani, D. & Garg, H. Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. Expert. Syst. 35(6), e12325 (2018).
Liu, X., Kim, H. S., Feng, F. & Alcantud, J. C. R. Centroid transformations of intuitionistic fuzzy values based on aggregation operators. Mathematics 6(11), 215 (2018).
Shahzadi, G., Akram, M. & Al-Kenani, A. N. Decision-making approach under Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted operators. Mathematics 8(1), 70 (2020).
Garg, H., Shahzadi, G. & Akram, M. Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager aggregation operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 1–16 (2020).
Khan, S. et al. Decision support technique based on neutrosophic Yager aggregation operators: Application in solar power plant locations—case study of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.. Math Probl Eng 202(1), 6677676 (2020).
ÖZLÜ, Ş. Aczel alsina aggregation operators of (M, N, Q)-spherical hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision-making. Sigma: Journal of Engineering & Natural Sciences/Mühendislik ve Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 43(6) (2025)
Liu, P., Shahzadi, G. & Akram, M. Specific types of q-rung picture fuzzy Yager aggregation operators for decision-making. Int J Comput Intell Syst 13(1), 1072–1091 (2020).
Özlü, Ş & Aktaş, H. Correlation coefficient of r, s, t-spherical hesitant fuzzy sets and MCDM problems based on clustering algorithm and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution method. Comput. Appl. Math. 43(8), 429 (2024).
Kamacı, H. & Petchimuthu, S. Navigating decision making with generalized temporal intuitionistic fuzzy sets and soft Sets. Punjab Univ J Math 56(5), 148–174 (2024).
Özlü, Ş. New q-rung orthopair fuzzy Aczel-Alsina weighted geometric operators under group-based generalized parameters in multi-criteria decision-making problems. Comput. Appl. Math. 43(3), 122 (2024).
Özlü, Ş. Bipolar-valued complex hesitant fuzzy Dombi aggregating operators based on multi-criteria decision-making problems. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 27(1), 162–189 (2025).
Yager, R. R. Aggregation operators and fuzzy systems modeling. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 67(2), 129–145 (1994).
Fortes, J. Green supply chain management: A literature. Otago Manag Grad Revi 7(1), 51–62 (2009).
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J. & Davarzani, H. Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 162, 101–114 (2015).
Kumari, R. & Mishra, A. R. Multi-criteria COPRAS method based on parametric measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Application of green supplier selection. Iran J Sci Technol, Trans Electr Eng 44(4), 1645–1662 (2020).
Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R. & Vafadarnikjoo, A. Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Expert Syst. Appl. 42, 7207–7220 (2015).
Rouyendegh, B. D., Yildizbasi, A. & Üstünyer, P. Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Soft. Comput. 24(3), 2215–2228 (2020).
Sarkis, J. A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 11(4), 397–409 (2003).
Srivastava, S. K. Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9(1), 53–80 (2007).
Uygun, Ö. & Dede, A. Performance evaluation of green supply chain management using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making techniques. Comput. Ind. Eng. 102, 502–511 (2016).
Jalil, F., Yang, J., Al-Okaily, M. & Rehman, S. U. E-commerce for a sustainable future: integrating trust, green supply chain management and online shopping satisfaction. Asia Pacific J Market Logist. 36(10), 2354–2370 (2024).
Letunovska, N. et al. Green supply chain management: The effect of procurement sustainability on reverse logistics. Logistics 7(3), 47 (2023).
Ahmad, A., Ikram, A., Rehan, M. F. & Ahmad, A. Going green: Impact of green supply chain management practices on sustainability performance. Front. Psychol. 13, 973676 (2022).
Bhatia, M. S. & Gangwani, K. K. Green supply chain management: Scientometric review and analysis of empirical research. J. Clean. Prod. 284, 124722 (2021).
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J. & Eshragh, A. A trade-off model for green supply chain planning: A leanness-versus-greenness analysis. Omega 54, 173–190 (2015).
Lee, V. H., Ooi, K. B., Chong, A. Y. L. & Seow, C. Creating technological innovation via green supply chain management: An empirical analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(16), 6983–6994 (2014).
Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., NoorulHaq, A. & Geng, Y. An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 47, 283–297 (2013).
Iddik, S. The role of cultural factors in green supply chain management practices: A conceptual framework and an empirical investigation. RAUSP Manag J. 59(2), 96–122 (2024).
Abdallah, A. B., Al-Ghwayeen, W. S., Al-Amayreh, E. A. M. & Sweis, R. J. The impact of green supply chain management on circular economy performance: The mediating roles of green innovations. Logistics 8(1), 20 (2024).
Xing, Y. & Liu, Y. Integrating product-service innovation into green supply chain management from a life cycle perspective: A systematic review and future research directions. Technovation 126, 102825 (2023).
Saini, N., Malik, K. & Sharma, S. Transformation of supply chain management to green supply chain management: Certain investigations for research and applications. Clean Mater 7, 100172 (2023).
Le, T. T. The association of corporate social responsibility and sustainable consumption and production patterns: The mediating role of green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 414, 137435 (2023).
Roh, T., Noh, J., Oh, Y. & Park, K. S. Structural relationships of a firm’s green strategies for environmental performance: The roles of green supply chain management and green marketing innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 356, 131877 (2022).
Selepe, R. L. & Makinde, O. A. Analysis of factors and solutions to poor supply chain quality in a manufacturing organisation. J Trans Supply Chain Manag 18, 989 (2024).
Yu, B., Zhao, X., Zheng, M., Yuan, X. & Hou, B. Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and hesitant fuzzy sets. J Math 2022(1), 1585079 (2022).
Seikh, M. R. & Mandal, U. Intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision-making. Granul Comput 6, 473–488 (2021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing-Original Draft were performed by YK and SR; Resources and Supervision, SR. Methodology, YK, SR and GBZ. Writing-Review &Editing, Visualization, SR and GBZ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
This study did not involve human or animal subjects.
Consent for publication
All the authors agree with this manuscript’s publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, Y., Ramalingam, S. & Zegeye, G.B. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy Yager aggregation framework for decision making in green supply chains. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37890-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37890-4