Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluation of real-time source apportionment approaches in six Chinese cities using the AXA (ACSM, Xact, Aethalometer) instrumental set-up
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 February 2026

Evaluation of real-time source apportionment approaches in six Chinese cities using the AXA (ACSM, Xact, Aethalometer) instrumental set-up

  • Manousos I. Manousakas1 nAff8,
  • Tianqu Cui1,
  • Qiyuan Wang2,3,
  • Lu Qi1,
  • Markus Furger1,
  • Rico K. Y. Cheung1,
  • Lubna Dada1,
  • Yufang Hao1,
  • Peeyush Khare1,
  • Jie Tian2,
  • Yuemei Han2,
  • Yang Chen4,
  • Shaofei Kong5,
  • Yunfei Wu6,
  • Yele Sun6,
  • Renjian Zhang7,
  • Jay G. Slowik1,
  • Junji Cao2,
  • Kaspar R. Daellenbach1 &
  • …
  • André S. H. Prévôt1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental sciences
  • Environmental social sciences

Abstract

This study evaluates an innovative system that can be used for Near Real-Time Source Apportionment (NRT model) providing results within minutes after the measurements across six Chinese cities: Beijing, Langfang, Shijiazhuang, Xi’an, Wuhan, and Chongqing during 2020–22. The system leverages the AXA instrumental setup (ACSM, Xact, Aethalometer) to integrate high–time-resolution data and provide detailed insights into major particulate matter (PM) sources and their contributions. Secondary PM components dominated across all sites, accounting for up to 66% of the total PM2.5 mass in some cities. Primary sources such as solid fuel combustion contributed approximately 10–30%, while episodic dust events were a major source in Langfang during specific periods. The system’s performance was validated by strong correlations (R2 > 0.82) with results from optimized source apportionment analyses. Furthermore, robustness tests using reduced datasets (two thirds for training and one third for validation) confirmed the system’s reliability and adaptability under dynamic monitoring conditions. In these tests, high correlations with the optimized source apportionment were achieved, indicating the operational reliability of the model. These findings underscore the NRT model’s potential as a critical tool for real-time air quality management, enabling rapid identification of pollution sources and informing timely mitigation strategies to improve urban air-quality.

Similar content being viewed by others

Optimized air quality management based on air quality index prediction and air pollutants identification in representative cities in China

Article Open access 02 August 2024

Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and prediction analysis of urban air quality in China

Article Open access 01 June 2023

Control of toxicity of fine particulate matter emissions in China

Article 09 July 2025

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Health Effects Institute. Health Effect Institute, State of global air 2020, in Special report. Health Effects Institute. 24 (2019).

  2. Wright, N. et al. Long-term ambient air pollution exposure and cardio-respiratory disease in China: findings from a prospective cohort study. Environ. Health 22, 1–11 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, R. et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing: Seasonal perspective. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 7053–7074 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rai, P. et al. Characteristics and sources of hourly elements in PM10 and PM2.5 during wintertime in Beijing. Environ. Pollut. 278, 116865 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, Z., Jiang, J., Fajardo, O., Wang, S. & Hao, J. Characteristics and health impacts of particulate matter pollution in China (2001–2011). Atmos. Environ. 65, 186–194 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yousefi, R. et al. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) trends from land surface changes and air pollution policies in China during 1980–2020. J. Environ. Manage. 326, 116847 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, Y. et al. Defending blue sky in China: Effectiveness of the “Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan” on air quality improvements from 2013 to 2017. J. Environ. Manage. 252, 109603 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, Y. et al. A review of atmospheric fine particulate matters: chemical composition, source identification and their variations in Beijing. Energy Sour., Part A: Recov., Util. Environ. Effects 44, 4783–4807 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan, F. et al. Frequent haze events associated with transport and stagnation over the corridor between North China Plain and Yangtze River Delta. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 2365–2376 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Z. et al. Haze weather and mortality in China from 2014 to 2020: Definitions, vulnerability, and effect modification by haze characteristics. J. Hazard. Mater. 466, 133561 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, G. et al. Real-time source apportionment of organic aerosols in three european cities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 15290–15297 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prakash, J. et al. Real-time source apportionment of fine particle inorganic and organic constituents at an urban site in Delhi city: An IoT-based approach. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 12, 101206 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yao, P. T. et al. Evaluation of a new real-time source apportionment system of PM2.5 and its implication on rapid aging of vehicle exhaust. Sci. Total Environ. 937, 173449 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manousakas, M. I. et al. Implementation of real-time source apportionment approaches using the ACSM–Xact–Aethalometer (AXA) setup with SoFi RT: the Athens case study. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 18, 3983–4002 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Canonaco, F. et al. SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 6, 3649–3661 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Furger, M. et al. Elemental composition of ambient aerosols measured with high temporal resolution using an online XRF spectrometer. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 10, 2061–2076 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fröhlich, R. et al. The ToF-ACSM: A portable aerosol chemical speciation monitor with TOFMS detection. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 6, 3225–3241 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ng, N. L. et al. Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging inferred from aerosol mass spectra. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 6465–6474 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tian, J. et al. Impacts of primary emissions and secondary aerosol formation on air pollution in an urban area of China during the COVID-19 lockdown. Environ. Int. 150, 106426 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Middlebrook, A. M. et al. Evaluation of composition-dependent collection efficiencies for the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer using field data. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46, 258–271 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zotter, P. et al. Evaluation of the absorption Ångström exponents for traffic and wood burning in the Aethalometer-based source apportionment using radiocarbon measurements of ambient aerosol. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 4229–4249 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tian, J. et al. Emission characteristics of primary brown carbon absorption: From biomass and coal burning: development of an optical emission inventory for China. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 124, 1879–1893 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sun, J. et al. Brown carbon’s emission factors and optical characteristics in household biomass burning: Developing a novel algorithm for estimating the contribution of brown carbon. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 2329–2341 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Y. et al. Mixing state of refractory black carbon in fog and haze at rural sites in winter on the North China Plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 17631–17648 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Q. et al. Measurement report: Source and mixing state of black carbon aerosol in the North China Plain: Implications for radiative effect. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 15427–15442 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wei, C. et al. Temporal characteristics and potential sources of black carbon in megacity Shanghai, China. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 125, e2019JD031827 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paatero, P. & Tappert, U. Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error stimates od data values. Environmetrics 5, 111–126 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rai, P. et al. Source apportionment of highly time resolved trace elements during a firework episode from a rural freeway site in Switzerland. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1229 (2019).

  29. Reff, A. et al. Receptor modeling of ambient particulate matter data using positive matrix factorization: Review of existing methods. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 57, 146–154 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ulbrich, I. M. et al. Interpretation of organic components from Positive Matrix Factorization of aerosol mass spectrometric data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 2891–2918 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Paatero, P. et al. Methods for estimating uncertainty in factor analytic solutions. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7, 781–797 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Canonaco, F. et al. A new method for long-term source apportionment with time-dependent factor profiles and uncertainty assessment using SoFi Pro: Application to 1 year of organic aerosol data. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 14, 923–943 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Smołka-Danielowska, D. & Jabłońska, M. Chemical and mineral composition of ashes from wood biomass combustion in domestic wood-fired furnaces. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 5359–5372 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sheesley, R. J. et al. Sensitivity of molecular marker-based CMB models to biomass burning source profiles. Atmos. Environ. 41, 9050–9063 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, Y. et al. Review of receptor-based source apportionment research of fine particulate matter and its challenges in China. Sci. Total Environ. 586, 917–929 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Viana, M. et al. Evidence of biomass burning aerosols in the Barcelona urban environment during winter time. Atmos. Environ. 72, 81–88 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, W. et al. Emission of metals from pelletized and uncompressed biomass fuels combustion in rural household stoves in China. Sci. Rep. 4, 1–7 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yan, C. et al. Residential coal combustion as a source of levoglucosan in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 1665–1674 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Reizer, M. et al. Measurement report: Receptor modelling for source identification of urban fine and coarse particulate matter using hourly elemental composition. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-253 (2021).

  40. Zhao, Y. et al. Emission controls of mercury and other trace elements during coal combustion in China: A review. Int. Geol. Rev. 60, 638–670 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schauer, J. J. et al. Characterization of metals emitted from motor vehicles. Res. Rep. Health Eff. Inst. 133, 1–76 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thorpe, A. & Harrison, R. M. Sources and properties of non-exhaust particulate matter from road traffic: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 400, 270–282 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Adachi, K. & Tainosho, Y. Characterization of heavy metal particles embedded in tire dust. Environ. Int. 30, 1009–1017 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Almeida, S. M. et al. Ambient particulate matter source apportionment using receptor modelling in European and Central Asia urban areas. Environ. Pollut. 266, 115199 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Manousakas, M. et al. Quantitative Assessment of the variability in chemical profiles from source apportionment analysis of PM10 and PM2.5 at different sites within a large Metropolitan area. Environ. Res. 192, 110257 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kong, S. F. et al. The impacts of firework burning at the Chinese Spring Festival on air quality: Insights of tracers, source evolution and aging processes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 2167–2184 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tanda, S. et al. Impact of New Year’s Eve fireworks on the size resolved element distributions in airborne particles. Environ. Int. 128, 371–378 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Moreno, T. et al. The identification of metallic elements in airborne particulate matter derived from fossil fuels at Puertollano, Spain. Int. J. Coal Geol. 71, 122–128 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tremper, A. H. et al. Field and laboratory evaluation of a high time resolution x-ray fluorescence instrument for determining the elemental composition of ambient aerosols. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 3541–3557 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rodríguez, S. et al. Tracking the changes of iron solubility and air pollutants traces as African dust transits the Atlantic in the Saharan dust outbreaks. Atmos. Environ. 246, 118092 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Manousakas, M. et al. Source identification of the elemental fraction of particulate matter using size segregated, highly time-resolved data and an optimized source apportionment approach. Atmos. Environ. X 14, 100165 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gini, M. et al. Mass size distributions, composition and dose estimates of particulate matter in Saharan dust outbreaks. Environ. Pollut. 298, 118768 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Canagaratna, M. R. et al. Chase studies of particulate emissions from in-use New York City vehicles. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38, 555–573 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Stefenelli, G. et al. Organic aerosol source apportionment in Zurich using an extractive electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (EESI-TOF-MS) - Part 1: Biogenic influences and day-night chemistry in summer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 14825–14848 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mohr, C. et al. Identification and quantification of organic aerosol from cooking and other sources in Barcelona using aerosol mass spectrometer data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 1649–1665 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ng, N. L. et al. Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 4625–4641 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zhai, S. et al. Control of particulate nitrate air pollution in China. Nat. Geosci. 14, 389–395 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chu, B. et al. Air pollutant correlations in china: secondary air pollutant responses to NOxand SO2Control. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 7, 695–700 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shao, J. et al. Heterogeneous sulfate aerosol formation mechanisms during wintertime Chinese haze events: Air quality model assessment using observations of sulfate oxygen isotopes in Beijing. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 6107–6123 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Li, K. et al. Effect of pollution level on size distributions and mixing state of ambient black carbon particles in an urban area during wintertime. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 21, 200655 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang, X. et al. East Asian dust storm in May 2017: Observations, modelling, and its influence on the Asia-Pacific region. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 8353–8371 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Guo, Z. et al. Source apportionment of fine particulate matter in Wuhan: Application of rolling positive matrix factorization under different seasons and episodic events. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 25, 7 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Huang, R. J. et al. Primary emissions versus secondary formation of fine particulate matter in the most polluted city (Shijiazhuang) in North China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 2283–2298 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sun, Y. et al. Characterization of summer organic and inorganic aerosols in Beijing, China with an Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor. Atmos. Environ. 51, 250–259 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cui, T. et al. Composition and sources of organic aerosol in two megacities in western China using complementary mass spectrometric and statistical techniques. ACS ES&T Air. 1, 1053–1065 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the SDC Clean-Air-China Programme (grant number 7F-09802.01.03). K.R.D. acknowledges support by SNSF Ambizione grant PZPGP2_201992.

Funding

This study was supported by the SDC Clean-Air-China Programme (grant number 7F-09802.01.03).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Manousos I. Manousakas

    Present address: Environmental Radioactivity & Aerosol Tech. for Atmospheric & Climate Impacts, INRaSTES, NationaL Centre of Scientific Research “Demokritos”, 15310, Agia Paraskevi, Greece

Authors and Affiliations

  1. PSI Center for Energy and Environmental Sciences, 5232, Villigen, Switzerland

    Manousos I. Manousakas, Tianqu Cui, Lu Qi, Markus Furger, Rico K. Y. Cheung, Lubna Dada, Yufang Hao, Peeyush Khare, Jay G. Slowik, Kaspar R. Daellenbach & André S. H. Prévôt

  2. Key Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Qiyuan Wang, Jie Tian, Yuemei Han & Junji Cao

  3. Guanzhong Plain Ecological Environment Change and Comprehensive Treatment National Observation and Research Station, Xi’an, 710061, China

    Qiyuan Wang

  4. Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China

    Yang Chen

  5. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, 430078, China

    Shaofei Kong

  6. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Extreme Meteorology, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

    Yunfei Wu & Yele Sun

  7. Xianghe Observatory of Whole Atmosphere, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xianghe, 065400, China

    Renjian Zhang

Authors
  1. Manousos I. Manousakas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tianqu Cui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qiyuan Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lu Qi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Markus Furger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rico K. Y. Cheung
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lubna Dada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yufang Hao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Peeyush Khare
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jie Tian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yuemei Han
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yang Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Shaofei Kong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yunfei Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Yele Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Renjian Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jay G. Slowik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Junji Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Kaspar R. Daellenbach
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. André S. H. Prévôt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.I.M. conceived and designed the study, developed the methodology and software, and performed the data analysis and validation. T.C. contributed to data analysis, validation, and manuscript editing. Q.W., L.Q., M.F., R.K.Y.C., L.D., Y.H., P.K., and J.T. participated in data collection and validation. Y.Ha., Y.C., S.K., Y.W., Y.S., and R.Z. provided resources, supervision, and local project coordination. K.R.D. and J.G.S. contributed to supervision, data interpretation, and manuscript review. J.C. and A.S.H.P. conceived and designed the study, supervised the project, provided funding, and contributed to manuscript revision. All authors discussed the results and contributed to editing and approving the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manousos I. Manousakas or André S. H. Prévôt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manousakas, M.I., Cui, T., Wang, Q. et al. Evaluation of real-time source apportionment approaches in six Chinese cities using the AXA (ACSM, Xact, Aethalometer) instrumental set-up. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38154-x

Download citation

  • Received: 22 October 2025

  • Accepted: 29 January 2026

  • Published: 19 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38154-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene