Table 5 Multiple logistic regression analysis to explore possible risk factors, primarily long-term cumulative standing duration, for a pathological reflux (0 = no; 1 = yes), N = 193.

From: Accelerometer-based assessment of occupational standing time and its association with venous disorders – results of a cross-sectional field study

 

Model 1

Model 2 (forward-backward-approach)

Model 3

Model 4

OR

p

lCI

uCI

OR

p

lCI

uCI

OR

p

lCI

uCI

OR

p

lCI

uCI

Intercept

0.539

0.008

0.340

0.844

0.104

0.762

-2.975

0.003

1.388

0.770

0.152

12.517

8.350

0.295

0.163

477.655

Long-term cumulative occupational standing time [in 100 h]

1.001

0.490

0.998

1.004

    

0.964

0.005

0.938

0.988

0.965

0.010

0.937

0.990

Age (years)

    

1.031

0.017

1.759

0.079

0.968

0.240

0.917

1.021

0.975

0.389

0.920

1.033

Long-term cumulative occupational standing time [h]* Age (years)

        

1.001

0.004

1.000

1.001

1.001

0.007

1.000

1.001

Mean period duration [s]

            

1.000

0.849

0.996

1.005

Gender (ref = women)

                

Men

            

0.870

0.687

0.439

1.707

BMI (in kg/m2)

            

0.956

0.280

0.879

1.036

Education (ref = primary)

                

Secondary

            

0.805

0.613

0.347

1.878

Tertiary

            

1.068

0.916

0.309

3.633

Work ability item 1

            

0.890

0.319

0.704

1.116

Family history: varicose veins in parents (ref = no)

                

One parent

            

1.180

0.624

0.610

2.303

Both

            

3.038

0.119

0.761

13.073

Smoking habit (ref = non-smoker)

                

Current

    

2.541

0.364

2.559

0.010

2.885

0.006

1.376

6.223

2.791

0.014

1.247

6.430

Ex-smoker

    

2.453

0.382

2.346

0.019

2.690

0.015

1.225

6.038

2.955

0.012

1.283

7.021

AIC

259.5204

252.7402

246.9788

257.8846

AUC

0.47

0.65

0.69

0.71

R2

<0.01

0.08

0.14

0.17

  1. lCI = lower CI; uCI = upper CI; ref = reference category; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; AUC = Area under the Curve; R2 calculated using the pseudo R2 by Nagelkerke (1 = best fit); statistically significant results are indicated in bold (p < 0.05).