Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Acute effects of intravitreal aflibercept injections on intraocular pressure in vitrectomized and silicone-oil-filled eyes: a prospective cohort study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 February 2026

Acute effects of intravitreal aflibercept injections on intraocular pressure in vitrectomized and silicone-oil-filled eyes: a prospective cohort study

  • Áron Szabó  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-4234-80411,
  • Géza Thury1,
  • Nóra Baranyi1,
  • Ferenc Rárosi2,
  • Dóra J. Szabó1,
  • Arnold Gale1,
  • Edit Tóth-Molnár1 &
  • …
  • Attila Kovács1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 149 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Medical research

Abstract

This prospective, single-center, single-blind, interventional cohort study compares acute intraocular pressure (IOP) changes following intravitreal aflibercept injections in eyes with different vitreous states. 67 eyes of 58 patients, including vitrectomized eyes with (n = 22) and without silicone oil tamponade (n = 22) and nonvitrectomized eyes (n = 23) were analyzed. Intravitreal aflibercept was administered according to guidelines. IOP was evaluated before and immediately after intravitreal injection (IVI) and at 5, 15, 30, 60, and 180 min, day 1, and week 1 postinjection. IOP measurements were taken with iCare-100 rebound tonometry (RBT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The mean participant age was 62.13 ± 14.06 years (male-to-female ratio, 1.48:1). Postinjection IOP increased to the same levels. IOP curve resolution was similar in all vitreous groups, showing no significant difference at any timepoints. Emulsified silicone oil did not affect the IOP curve. Prior IVI count had some influence on the dynamics of IOP spike resolution but did not affect the initial IOP rise. RBT showed moderate-to-good agreement with GAT, except for extremely elevated IOPs where it appeared less consistent. Intra-silicone and post-vitrectomy administration of aflibercept is safe. RBT may be considered for nonglaucomatous cases as an easy alternative to follow-up postinjection acute IOP changes.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Rimpela, A. K., Kiiski, I., Deng, F., Kidron, H. & Urtti, A. Pharmacokinetic simulations of intravitreal biologicals: aspects of drug delivery to the posterior and anterior segments. Pharmaceutics 11, 103390pharmaceutics11010009 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. El Chehab, H., Agard, E., Russo, A., Boujnah, Y. & Dot, C. Intraocular pressure spikes after Aflibercept intravitreal injections. Ophthalmologica 236, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000446878 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. LoBue, S. A. et al. Clinical features associated with acute elevated intraocular pressure after intravitreal Anti-VEGF injections. Clin. Ophthalmol. 17, 1683–1690. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S414212 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melo, G. B. et al. Critical analysis of techniques and materials used in devices, syringes, and needles used for intravitreal injections. Prog Retin Eye Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100862 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia, S. B. et al. Prevalence and implications of the presence of intraocular silicone oil droplets in patients treated with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF. BMC Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02536-2 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parke, D. W. 3rd., Sisk, R. A., Houston, S. K. & Murray, T. G. Ocular hypertension after intravitreal triamcinolone with vitrectomy and phacoemulsification. Clin. Ophthalmol. 6, 925–31. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S32934 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patil, N. S. et al. Intravitreal steroids compared with anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic macular edema: A meta-analysis. Ophthalmol. Retina 7, 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2022.10.008 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, Y. et al. Ocular pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in vitrectomized eyes with silicone oil tamponade. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 5221–5226. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-9702 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cascavilla, M. L., Querques, G., Querques, L., Codenotti, M. & Bandello, F. Intravitreal Ranibizumab for myopic choroidal neovascularization after pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil tamponade. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 23, 913–916. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000337 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Falavarjani, K. G., Modarres, M. & Nazari, H. Therapeutic effect of bevacizumab injected into the silicone oil in eyes with neovascular glaucoma after vitrectomy for advanced diabetic retinopathy. Eye (Lond). 24, 717–719. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.94 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferro Desideri, L. et al. Evidence-based guidelines for drug dosing in intravitreal injections in silicone oil-filled eyes: Pharmacokinetics, safety, and optimal dosage. Surv. Ophthalmol. 70, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.09.006 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baek, S. K., Lee, M. W. & Lee, Y. H. Effect of Intrasilicone bevacizumab injection in diabetic tractional retinal detachment surgery: A retrospective case-control study. J. Clin. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103114 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chopra, R. et al. Intravitreal injections: past trends and future projections within a UK tertiary hospital. Eye (Lond). 36, 1373–1378. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01646-3 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. McLaughlin, M. D. & Hwang, J. C. Trends in vitreoretinal procedures for Medicare Beneficiaries, 2000 to 2014. Ophthalmology 124, 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.01.001 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shaarawy, T., Sherwood, M. & Grehn, F. WGA Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials (Kugler, 2009).

  16. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 105, 1-169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines

  17. Abegao Pinto, L., Sunaric Mégevand, G. & Stalmans, I. European glaucoma Society: A guide on surgical innovation for glaucoma. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 107(114), 1. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2023-egsguidelines (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grzybowski, A. et al. Update on intravitreal injections: Euretina expert consensus recommendations. Ophthalmologica 239, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1159/000486145 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodrigues, E. B. et al. Effect of needle type and injection technique on pain level and vitreal reflux in intravitreal injection. J. Ocul Pharmacol. Ther. 27, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2010.0082 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levin, A. M., Chaya, C. J., Kahook, M. Y. & Wirostko, B. M. Intraocular pressure elevation following intravitreal Anti-VEGF injections: Short- and long-term considerations. J. Glaucoma 30, 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001894 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Theelen, T., Tilanus, M. A. & Klevering, B. J. Intraocular inflammation following endotamponade with high-density silicone oil. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 242, 617–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-004-0898-7 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miele, A. et al. Ocular hypertension and glaucoma following vitrectomy: A systematic review. Retina 38, 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001651 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elhusseiny, A. M. & Sallam, A. B. Cataract surgery in adult eyes with short axial length. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 34, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000913 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Qian, Z. et al. Detection of shallow anterior chamber depth from two-dimensional anterior segment photographs using deep learning. BMC Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-02104-0 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jeong, S., Sagong, M. & Chang, W. Acute angle closure attack after an intravitreal bevacizumab injection for branch retinal vein occlusion: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0417-3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Toris, C. B., Yablonski, M. E., Wang, Y. L. & Camras, C. B. Aqueous humor dynamics in the aging human eye. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 127, 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00436-x (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sachdeva, R., Iordanous, Y. & Lin, T. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by iCare tonometers and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 58, 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.06.002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Munkwitz, S., Elkarmouty, A., Hoffmann, E. M., Pfeiffer, N. & Thieme, H. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 246, 875–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0758-3 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, M. L. et al. Single vs multiple intraocular pressure measurements in glaucoma surgical trials. JAMA Ophthalmol. 132, 956–962. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.867 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. AlMubrad, T. M. & Ogbuehi, K. C. The effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements. Clin. Exp. Optom. 91, 524–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00298.x (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gaton, D. D. et al. Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements. Curr. Eye Res. 35, 475–479. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713681003678824 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Meduri, E., Gillmann, K. & Mansouri, K. Intraocular pressure variations after intravitreal injections measured with an implanted suprachoroidal telemetry sensor. J. Glaucoma. 30, e360–e363. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001879 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Recep, O. F., Hasiripi, H., Vayisoglu, E., Kalayci, D. & Sarikatipoglu, H. Accurate time interval in repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 76, 603–605. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760518.x (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sternfeld, A., Ehrlich, R., Weinberger, D. & Dotan, A. Effect of different lens status on intraocular pressure elevation in patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 13, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2020.01.12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Brusini, P., Salvetat, M. L. & Zeppieri, M. How to measure intraocular pressure: An updated review of various tonometers. J. Clin. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173860 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Editorial assistance in the preparation of this article was provided by Shirlene Parker of Enago.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Szeged. Editorial assistance was funded by University of Szeged, Klebelsberg Library, Szeged, Hungary. Open Access publishing is supported by open access agreement between the University of Szeged (ref: 8056) and publisher.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Szeged, Korányi Fasor 10–11, Szeged, 6720, Hungary

    Áron Szabó, Géza Thury, Nóra Baranyi, Dóra J. Szabó, Arnold Gale, Edit Tóth-Molnár & Attila Kovács

  2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary

    Ferenc Rárosi

Authors
  1. Áron Szabó
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Géza Thury
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nóra Baranyi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ferenc Rárosi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dóra J. Szabó
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Arnold Gale
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Edit Tóth-Molnár
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Attila Kovács
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Á.Sz. conceptualised the study, collected, analysed, and visualised data, wrote and edited the manuscript. G.T. collected data, edited the manuscript. N.B. collected data. F.R. analysed and visualised data, wrote the manuscript. D.J.Sz. collected data, edited the manuscript. A.G. collected data. E.T.-M. provided clinical resources, critically reviewed the manuscript. A.K. conceptualised the study, collected data, wrote and edited the manuscript, performed intravitreal procedures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Áron Szabó.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The Ethics Committee of the University of Szeged reviewed and approved the trial (Protocol no. NH_SiOP-001, Reference no. 168/2022-SZTE RKEB). The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, and its later amendments. All subjects provided informed consent to participate in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szabó, Á., Thury, G., Baranyi, N. et al. Acute effects of intravitreal aflibercept injections on intraocular pressure in vitrectomized and silicone-oil-filled eyes: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38455-1

Download citation

  • Received: 18 October 2025

  • Accepted: 29 January 2026

  • Published: 16 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38455-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Aflibercept
  • Injection
  • Intraocular pressure
  • Intra-silicone oil
  • Vitrectomized
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing