Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Exploring the association between mental imagery, sensory sensitivity, and autistic traits in autistic and non-autistic adults
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 February 2026

Exploring the association between mental imagery, sensory sensitivity, and autistic traits in autistic and non-autistic adults

  • Rebecca Taylor  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6440-81341,2,
  • Petroc Sumner  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-05102,
  • Krish D. Singh  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-24752 &
  • …
  • Catherine R. G. Jones  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0541-04311 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Abstract

Mental imagery vividness varies between individuals. Low levels of mental imagery have been associated with high levels of autistic traits, whilst autistic traits are known to positively correlate with sensory sensitivities. This would predict a negative correlation between sensory sensitivity and imagery. However, one recent study has suggested that mental imagery vividness may be positively associated with sensory sensitivities, possibly through the shared mechanism of hyperexcitability of the sensory cortices. The aim of this paper was to explore this contradictory set of associations across two modalities (visual and tactile). We used standardised questionnaires to measure autistic traits, sensory sensitivities, and mental imagery vividness in a sample evenly comprised of autistic and non-autistic adults (n = 595). Higher autistic traits were significantly associated with lower mental imagery (r =  − 0.20 and r =  − 0.17 for visual and tactile imagery respectively), and a higher incidence of aphantasia was observed in the autistic group compared to the non-autistic group. In addition, higher autistic traits were significantly associated with increased sensory sensitivities (r = 0.76). Importantly, we found negligible evidence of an association between mental imagery and sensory sensitivity, even when controlling for autistic traits. In the first study to directly explore autistic traits, sensory sensitivities and mental imagery, we conclude that there is no clear evidence to suggest that mental imagery and sensory sensitivity are related, challenging the idea of shared mechanisms of hyperexcitability of sensory cortex.

Data availability

The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zeman, A., Dewar, M. & Della Sala, S. Lives without imagery—Congenital aphantasia. Cortex 73, 378–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zeman, A. et al. Phantasia—The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. Cortex 130, 426–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.003 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Milton, F. et al. Behavioral and neural signatures of visual imagery vividness extremes: Aphantasia versus hyperphantasia. Cerebral Cortex Commun. 2, 035. https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab035 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dawes, A. J., Keogh, R., Andrillon, T. & Pearson, J. A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia. Sci. Rep. 10, 10022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dance, C. J. et al. What is the relationship between aphantasia, synaesthesia and autism?. Conscious Cogn 89, 103087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103087 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. King, R., Buxton, H. & Tyndall, I. Aphantasia and autism: An investigation of mental imagery vividness. Conscious Cogn. 125, 103749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2024.103749 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dichter, G. S., Lam, K. S. L., Turner-Brown, L. M., Holtzclaw, T. N. & Bodfish, J. W. Generativity abilities predict communication deficits but not repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 39, 1298–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0742-3 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jarrold, C. A review of research into pretend play in autism. Autism 7, 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361303007004004 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dance, C. J., Ward, J. & Simner, J. What is the link between mental imagery and sensory sensitivity? Insights from aphantasia. Perception 50, 757–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/03010066211042186 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 (2013).

  11. Pearson, J. The human imagination: The cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 624–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dijkstra, N., Ambrogioni, L., Vidaurre, D. & van Gerven, M. Neural dynamics of perceptual inference and its reversal during imagery. eLife 9, e53588. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53588 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zvyagintsev, M. et al. Brain networks underlying mental imagery of auditory and visual information. Eur. J. Neurosci. 37, 1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12140 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plailly, J., Delon-Martin, C. & Royet, J.-P. Experience induces functional reorganization in brain regions involved in odor imagery in perfumers. Hum. Brain Map. 33, 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21207 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt, T. T., Ostwald, D. & Blankenburg, F. Imaging tactile imagery: Changes in brain connectivity support perceptual grounding of mental images in primary sensory cortices. NeuroImage 98, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.014 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cattaneo, Z., Pisoni, A., Papagno, C. & Silvanto, J. Modulation of visual cortical excitability by working memory: Effect of luminance contrast of mental imagery. Front. Psychol. 2, 29 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sparing, R. et al. Visual cortex excitability increases during visual mental imagery—A TMS study in healthy human subjects. Brain Res. 938, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02478-2 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ward, J. Individual differences in sensory sensitivity: A synthesizing framework and evidence from normal variation and developmental conditions. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2018.1557131 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tomchek, S. D. & Dunn, W. Sensory Processing in children with and without autism: A comparative study using the short sensory profile. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 61, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.2.190 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robertson, A. E. & David, R. S. R. The sensory experiences of adults with autism spectrum disorder: A qualitative analysis. Perception 44, 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7833 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hatakeyama, T. Associations between autistic-like traits and imagery ability. Vision 8, 13 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E. A. & Kosslyn, S. M. Mental imagery: Functional mechanisms and clinical applications. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 590–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lai, M.-C. et al. Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 6, 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blomkvist, A. & Marks, D. F. Defining and ‘diagnosing’ aphantasia: Condition or individual difference?. Cortex 169, 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.004 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wing, L., Gould, J. & Gillberg, C. Autism spectrum disorders in the DSM-V: Better or worse than the DSM-IV?. Res. Dev. Disabil. 32, 768–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.003 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kissine, M. Pragmatics, cognitive flexibility and autism spectrum disorders. Mind Lang. 27, 27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01433.x (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J. & Clubley, E. The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 31, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005653411471 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wicken, M., Keogh, R. & Pearson, J. The critical role of mental imagery in human emotion: Insights from fear-based imagery and aphantasia. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 288, 20210267. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0267 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Crespi, B., Leach, E., Dinsdale, N., Mokkonen, M. & Hurd, P. Imagination in human social cognition, autism, and psychotic-affective conditions. Cognition 150, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.001 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cook, R., Shah, P., Gaule, A., Brewer, R. & Bird, G. Autism and developmental prosopagnosia: A cross-disorder study. J. Vis. 15, 1211–1211. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.12.1211 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fulford, J. et al. The neural correlates of visual imagery vividness—An fMRI study and literature review. Cortex 105, 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.014 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Speckens, A. E. M., Hackmann, A., Ehlers, A. & Cuthbert, B. Imagery special issue: Intrusive images and memories of earlier adverse events in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 38, 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.09.004 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Keogh, R. & Pearson, J. The blind mind: No sensory visual imagery in aphantasia. Cortex 105, 53–60 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.012 (2018).

  34. Bilzer, M. & Monzel, M. The Phenomenology of Offline Perception: Multisensory Profiles of Voluntary Mental Imagery and Dream Imagery. Vision (Basel) 9 https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9020037 (2025).

  35. Lima, C. F. et al. Feel the Noise: Relating Individual Differences in Auditory Imagery to the Structure and Function of Sensorimotor Systems. Cerebral Cortex 25, 4638–4650 https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv134 (2015).

  36. Wing, L., Gould, J. & Gillberg, C. Autism spectrum disorders in the DSM-V: Better or worse than the DSM-IV? Research in Developmental Disabilities 32, 768–773 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.003 (2011).

  37. Kissine, M. Pragmatics, Cognitive Flexibility and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Mind & Language 27, 27https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv134 (2012).

  38. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J. & Clubley, E. The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Males and Females, Scientists and Mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31, 5–17 (2001).

  39. Kharlas, D. A. & Frewen, P. Trait mindfulness correlates with individual differences in multisensory imagery vividness. Personality and Individual Differences 93, 44–50 (2016).

  40. Wicken, M., Keogh, R. & Pearson, J. The critical role of mental imagery in human emotion: insights from fear-based imagery and aphantasia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288, 20210267 (2021).

  41. Crespi, B., Leach, E., Dinsdale, N., Mokkonen, M. & Hurd, P. Imagination in human social cognition, autism, and psychotic-affective conditions. Cognition 150, 181–199 (2016).

  42. Cook, R., Shah, P., Gaule, A., Brewer, R. & Bird, G. Autism and Developmental Prosopagnosia: A Cross-Disorder Study. Journal of Vision 15, 1211–1211 (2015).

  43. Fulford, J. et al. The neural correlates of visual imagery vividness – An fMRI study and literature review. Cortex 105, 26–40 (2018).

  44. Shepard, R. N. & Metzler, J. Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects. Science 171, 701–703 (1971).

  45. Pounder, Z. et al. Only minimal differences between individuals with congenital aphantasia and those with typical imagery on neuropsychological tasks that involve imagery. Cortex 148, 180–192 (2022).

  46. Schulz, S. E. & Stevenson, R. A. Convergent Validity of Behavioural and Subjective Sensitivity in Relation to Autistic Traits. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 52, 758–770 (2022).

  47. Speckens, A. E. M., Hackmann, A., Ehlers, A. & Cuthbert, B. Imagery special issue: Intrusive images and memories of earlier adverse events in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 38, 411–422 (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Adam Zeman for personal correspondence about the adapted Vividness of Visual Mental Imagery Questionnaire. We would also like to thank Jacob Bussell for consulting on the study protocol and materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wales Autism Research Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Rebecca Taylor & Catherine R. G. Jones

  2. School of Psychology, Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Rebecca Taylor, Petroc Sumner & Krish D. Singh

Authors
  1. Rebecca Taylor
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Petroc Sumner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Krish D. Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Catherine R. G. Jones
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RT: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis; writing—original draft preparation; PS: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing; KS: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing; CRGJ: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine R. G. Jones.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, R., Sumner, P., Singh, K.D. et al. Exploring the association between mental imagery, sensory sensitivity, and autistic traits in autistic and non-autistic adults. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38574-9

Download citation

  • Received: 19 August 2025

  • Accepted: 30 January 2026

  • Published: 25 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38574-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing