Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
O-RAID: a satellite constellation architecture for ultra-resilient global data backup
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 February 2026

O-RAID: a satellite constellation architecture for ultra-resilient global data backup

  • R. G. N. Meegama1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 481 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Growing global data volumes and the increasing frequency of climate-related and geopolitical threats highlight the need for ultra-resilient backup infrastructures. This paper proposes a novel Satellite-RAID architecture, named O-RAID, in which clusters of satellites operate as a distributed redundant array of independent disks (RAID), enabling large-scale cold and warm backup storage in Earth’s orbit. Unlike previous work on space-based computing or satellite cloud relays, this research presents a formal design for orbital storage redundancy, inter-satellite parity exchange, latency-tolerant RAID protocols and power provisioning using a geostationary solar-energy beam. To establish a foundation for quantifying system resilience, we develop a reliability framework based on a Continuous-Time Markov Chain (CTMC) model, defining the states and transition rates for future survivability analysis of an orbital RAID equivalent. The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the system architecture, its core components and the mathematical underpinnings for erasure coding and communication. An in-depth examination of system feasibility, survivability simulations, key constraints and communication overhead is presented, concluding that orbital backup storage presents a viable and promising paradigm for national archives, disaster-resilient storage and long-term scientific data preservation with technical readiness projected by 2035.

Similar content being viewed by others

Exploring the relationship between space weather conditions and power performance of EgyptSat-1 using machine learning

Article Open access 12 December 2025

Radiation-tolerant atomic-layer-scale RF system for spaceborne communication

Article 28 January 2026

Application and accuracy analysis of raw one way inter-satellite link observations of BDS-3 full operational constellation

Article Open access 25 April 2025

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. All Python codes used for simulations are available at: https://github.com/rgn14/oraid

References

  1. Reinsel, D., Gantz, J. & Rydning, J. Data age 2025: The evolution of data to life-critical. https://www.seagate.com/files/www-content/our-story/trends/files/Seagate-WP-DataAge2025-March-2017.pdf (2017).

  2. Koot, M. & Wijnhoven, F. Usage impact on data center electricity needs- a system dynamic forecasting model. Appl. Energy 291, 116798 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Green, B. & Nguyen, T. What happens when data centers come to town? University of Michigan Report (2024).

  4. Forum, W. E. The USD 3.3 trillion climate question: Can data centres take the heat? https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/data-centres-3-3-trillion-question-heat-cooling/ (2025).

  5. Gazzola, V. et al. Analysis of territorial risks and protection factors for the business continuity of data centers. Sustainability 15, 6005 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davarian, F. et al. Improving small satellite communications and tracking in deep space-a review of the existing systems and technologies with recommendations for improvement. Part ii: Small satellite navigation, proximity links, and communications link science. IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag. 35, 26 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Beech, T. Mission operations and ground systems 101. In Proceedings of the Ground Segment Architecture Workshop (2021).

  8. Ben-Larbi, M. K. et al. Towards the automated operations of large distributed satellite systems. Part 1. Review and paradigm shifts. Adv. Space Res. 67, 3598–3619 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watch, D. C. Q2 2025 UPDATE: 125% Surge in Data Center Opposition.

  10. Hub, G. D. C. From Permit to Power-On: How Data Centers Actually Get Built.

  11. Rosner-Uddin, R. Data centre groups plan lobbying blitz to counter ai energy backlash. Financial Times (2026). [Online; posted in Honolulu].

  12. Lavillotti, M. Impacts of construction timelines on generation availability. Climate and Energy 8–14, https://doi.org/10.1002/gas.22463 (2025).

  13. Kluger, J. Data centers are lousy for the planet. Should we move them to space? (2024).

  14. Greengard, S. Datacenters go to space. Communications of the ACM (2025).

  15. Lee, A. Bringing data centers to outer space (2025). Blog post.

  16. Pultarova, T. Nvidia sends a powerful GPU to space (2025).

  17. Baek, S. H., Kim, B. W., Joung, E. J. & Park, C. W. Reliability and performance of hierarchical RAID with multiple controllers. In Proceedings of the twentieth annual ACM symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 246–254 (2001).

  18. Welton, N. J. & Ades, A. E. Estimation of Markov chain transition probabilities and rates from fully and partially observed data: Uncertainty propagation, evidence synthesis, and model calibration. Med. Decis. Mak. 25, 633–645 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jin, C., Jiang, H., Feng, D. & Tian, L. P-code: A new RAID-6 code with optimal properties. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Supercomputing, 360–369 (ACM, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA, 2009).

  20. Thomasian, A. & Tang, Y. Performance, reliability, and performability of a hybrid RAID array and a comparison with traditional RAID1 arrays. Clust. Comput. 15, 239–253 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Plank, J. S., James, C. D. & Xu, L. Liberation codes: The case for freeing RAID-6 from Reed-Solomon. In USENIX FAST (2008).

  22. Liang, J., Chaudhry, A. U., Erdogan, E. & Yanikomeroglu, H. Link budget analysis for free-space optical satellite networks. In IEEE 23rd International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 471–476 (IEEE, 2022).

  23. Community, S. F. RAID 5/6 rebuild time calculation. https://serverfault.com/questions/967930/raid-5-6-rebuild-time-calculation (2017).

  24. Clery, D. Has a new dawn arrived for space-based solar power. Science 378, 238–239 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Alam, K. S. et al. Towards net zero: A technological review on the potential of space-based solar power and wireless power transmission. Heliyon 10, e29996 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liou, J.-C. & Johnson, N. L. Instability of the present LEO sun-synchronous orbital debris environment. Adv. Space Res. 41, 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.04.081 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Probert, B., Clark, R. A., Blasch, E. & Macdonald, M. A review of distributed ledger technologies for satellite operations. IEEE Access 13, 123230–123258. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3588688 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cao, X., Li, Y., Xiong, X. & Wang, J. Dynamic routings in satellite networks: An overview. Sensors 22, 4552 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hiriart, T., Castet, J.-F., Lafleur, J. M. & Saleh, J. H. Comparative reliability of GEO, LEO and MEO satellites. In Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) (2009).

  30. Castet, J.-F. & Saleh, J. H. Satellite and satellite subsystems reliability: Statistical data analysis and modeling. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94, 1718–1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.004 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Farid, A. A. & Hranilović, S. Outage capacity optimization for free-space optical links with pointing errors. J. Lightwave Technol. 25, 1702–1710. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2007.899174 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  32. European Space Agency (ESTEC). Pointing error engineering handbook. https://peet.estec.esa.int/files/ESSB-HB-E-003-Issue1(19July2011).pdf (2011).

  33. Abernethy, R. B. et al. Weibull Analysis Handbook (Tech. Rep, Pratt and Whitney Aircraft, 1983).

  34. Wertz, J. R., Everett, D. F. & Puschell, J. J. Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD (Microcosm Press, 2011).

  35. Choi, J. Enhancing reliability in LEO satellite networks via high-speed inter-satellite links. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 13, 2200–2204 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Song, T. et al. Impact of pointing errors on the error performance of inter-satellite laser communications. J. Lightwave Technol. 35, 3082–3093. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2705132 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Valentini, L., Faedi, A., Paolini, E. & Chiani, M. Analysis of pointing loss effects in deep space optical links. IEEE/OSA J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 14, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.421345 (2022). Preprint available arXiv:2112.02514.

  38. Vries, W. D. & Phillion, D. Monte Carlo method for collision probability calculations using 3D satellite models. Technical Report LLNL-CONF-454474, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA (2010).

  39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The space economy in figures. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/12/the-space-economy-in-figures_4c52ae39/fa5494aa-en.pdf (2023). Reports significantly lower launch costs facilitating access to space and rapid growth in satellite capacity

  40. Mizrahi, O. et al. Space solar power generation: A viable system proposal. Joule 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2025.1001096 (2025).

  41. Schieler, C. M. et al. 200 Gbps TBIRD CubeSat downlink: pre-flight test results. In Free-Space Laser Communications XXXIV, 11993, 1199307 (SPIE, 2022).

  42. Trautwein, D. et al. Design and evaluation of IPFS: A storage layer for the decentralized web. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference, 739–752 (2022).

  43. Kessler, D. J. & Cour-Palais, B. G. Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 83, 2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA06p02637 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Apple Research and Development Center, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Gangodawila, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka

    R. G. N. Meegama

Authors
  1. R. G. N. Meegama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.G.N. Meegama is responsible for the conception, design, analysis and writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. G. N. Meegama.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Intellectual property related to aspects of the work described in this article is the subject of provisional patent filings by the author in the United States.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meegama, R.G.N. O-RAID: a satellite constellation architecture for ultra-resilient global data backup. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38784-1

Download citation

  • Received: 19 November 2025

  • Accepted: 31 January 2026

  • Published: 10 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38784-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics