Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Surgical delays between indication and operating room access in patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 09 February 2026

Surgical delays between indication and operating room access in patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery

  • Luca Agnifili1,
  • Matteo Sacchi2,
  • Michele Figus3,
  • Michele Iester4,
  • Antonio Pinna2,
  • Chiara Posarelli3,
  • Paola Cassottana4,
  • Luca Virgilio Corboli1,
  • Matteo Fornaro1,
  • Alessandro Palma3,
  • Annalisa Marotta5,
  • Marta di Nicola5 &
  • …
  • Leonardo Mastropasqua1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 450 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Glaucoma
  • Risk factors
  • Surgery

Abstract

Surgical delays between indication for surgery and access to the operating room in glaucoma filtration surgery (GFS) are unknown. We reviewed medical charts of the first fifty patients’ undergoing GFS from February 2017, 2019, and 2022 with the aim to: (i) measure waiting times between indication for surgery to pre-surgical workup, pre-surgical workup to surgery, and indication to surgery; (ii) identify factors affecting the pre-surgical path duration, and (iii) evaluate whether waiting times changed in the 2017–2022 quinquennium.

633 patients, in four tertiary-care Italian Centers, were enrolled. At the indication for surgery, the mean deviation (MD) was − 13.4 dB (IQR: -21.2; -6.9), with an advanced glaucoma in 54.6% of cases (MD: -20.3 dB), and a median IOP of 24 mmHg (IQR: 20.0–28.0). Overall, patients waited 44.0 days (IQR: 21.0–72.0) between indication for GFS and surgery, with the interval between indication and pre-surgical workup being the most time consuming step (32.0 days (IQR: 8.0-51.8)). Patients living in South Italy, with primary glaucoma, an IOP less than 20 mmHg, scheduled for a first phaco-combined trabeculectomy, non-monocular, and with systemic comorbidities, waited more. Since glaucoma may continue to progress while waiting, efficient organizational strategies should be adopted to optimize the pre-surgical path duration.

Similar content being viewed by others

Minimally invasive bleb surgery versus minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: a 12-month retrospective study

Article Open access 04 June 2024

Relationship between Schlemm’s canal incision length and the results of ab interno gonioscopy-assisted transluminal suture trabeculotomy

Article Open access 07 February 2025

Nationwide incidence of and risk factors for undergoing incisional glaucoma surgery following infantile cataract surgery

Article Open access 15 July 2024

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Gedde, S. J. et al. Primary Open-Angle glaucoma preferred practice patterns. Ophthalmology 128(1), P71–P150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma, 5th Edition. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 105(Suppl 1), 1–169. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-egsguidelines (2021).

  3. Virtanen, A. et al. Incidence of glaucoma filtration surgery from disease onset of open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 102(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16618 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diniz-Filho, A. et al. Association between intraocular pressure and rates of retinal nerve fiber layer loss measured by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 123(10), 2058–2065. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16618 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed, A. et al. Intraocular pressure and rates of macular thinning in glaucoma. Ophthalmol. Glaucoma. 6(5), 457–465 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chauhan, B. C. et al. Canadian glaucoma study: 2. Risk factors for the progression of open-angle glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 126(8), 1030–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2023.03.008 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. DeCoster, C. et al. Waiting times for surgical procedures. Med. Care. 37(6 Suppl), JS187–205. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199906001-00016 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gimbel, H. V. & Dardzhikova, A. A. Consequences of waiting for cataract surgery. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 22(1), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e328341425d (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keay, L. et al. Vision and driving status of older Australians with cataract: an investigation of public hospital waiting lists. Clin. Exp. Optom. 99(5), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12414 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conner-Spady, B. et al. A systematic literature review of the evidence on benchmarks for cataract surgery waiting time. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 42(4), 543–551 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hodge, W. et al. The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review. CMAJ 176(9), 1285–1290. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060962 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carr, T., Teucher, U. & Casson, A. G. Waiting for scheduled surgery: A complex patient experience. J. Health Psychol. 22(3), 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060962 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bachelet, V. C., Goyenechea, M. & Carrasco, V. A. Policy strategies to reduce waiting times for elective surgery: A scoping review and evidence synthesis. Int. J. Health Plann. Manage. 34(2), e995–e1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2751 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ballini, L. et al. Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015(2), CD005610. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005610.pub2 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hopkins, R. B. et al. Cost-effectiveness of reducing wait times for cataract surgery in Ontario. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 43(2), 213–217. https://doi.org/10.3129/i08-002 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hodge, W. G. et al. An investigation of the relationship between cataract surgery wait times and rates of surgery. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 47, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.3129/i08-002 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rathnayake, D., Clarke, M. & Jayasinghe, V. Patient prioritization methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: A systematic review of how to improve access for surgery. PLoS One. 16(8), e0256578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256578 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hodapp, E., Parrish, R. K. I. I. & Anderson, D. R. Clinical Decisions in Glaucoma 52–61 (The CV Mosby Co, 1993).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Ageing Science, University ‘G. d’Annunzio’ of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, Chieti (CH), 66100, Italy

    Luca Agnifili, Luca Virgilio Corboli, Matteo Fornaro & Leonardo Mastropasqua

  2. Ophthalmology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy

    Matteo Sacchi & Antonio Pinna

  3. Ophthalmology Unit, Department of Surgery, Medicine, Molecular and Emergency, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    Michele Figus, Chiara Posarelli & Alessandro Palma

  4. Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), Eye Clinic, University of Genova, Genova, Italy

    Michele Iester & Paola Cassottana

  5. Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Laboratory of Biostatistics, University ‘G. d’Annunzio’ of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy

    Annalisa Marotta & Marta di Nicola

Authors
  1. Luca Agnifili
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Sacchi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michele Figus
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michele Iester
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Antonio Pinna
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chiara Posarelli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Paola Cassottana
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Luca Virgilio Corboli
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Matteo Fornaro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Alessandro Palma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Annalisa Marotta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Marta di Nicola
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Leonardo Mastropasqua
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Luca Agnifili: conception and design of the work, literature search, drafting the work, interpreted data, approved the article. Matteo Sacchi: drafting the article, interpretation of data, literature search, final approval of the article. Michele Figus, Michele Iester, Antonio Pinna, Leonardo Mastropasqua: critical interpretation of results, final approval of the article. Chiara Posarelli: drafting article, critical interpretation of results, final approval of the article. Marta Di Nicola, Annalisa Marotta: data analysis, interpretation of data, final approval of the article. Matteo Fornaro, Luca Virgilio Corboli, Paola Cassottana, Alessandro Palma: acquisition and interpretation of data, final approval of the article. Luca Agnifili and Matteo Sacchi equally contributed to this work and share primary authorship. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Agnifili.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agnifili, L., Sacchi, M., Figus, M. et al. Surgical delays between indication and operating room access in patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39121-2

Download citation

  • Received: 10 April 2025

  • Accepted: 03 February 2026

  • Published: 09 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39121-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Glaucoma filtration surgery
  • Waiting times
  • Surgical delays
  • Pre-surgical workup
  • Pre-surgical pathway
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing