Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from duckweed cultivation systems using diluted liquid manure
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 February 2026

Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from duckweed cultivation systems using diluted liquid manure

  • Timo Stadtlander1,
  • David Mauricio Gomez1,2,
  • Rebecca Müller1,
  • Cem Baki1,
  • Nicolas Brueggemann2,3,
  • Florian Leiber1,
  • Hans-Martin Krause4 &
  • …
  • Lucilla Agostini4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 690 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Agroecology
  • Climate change
  • Climate-change ecology
  • Environmental biotechnology
  • Environmental impact

Abstract

Protein from duckweed (Araceae, subfamily Lemnoideae) grown on diluted animal slurries for nutrient upcycling could potentially replace plant-derived feed proteins which would be more efficiently used as human food. However, little information is available on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from slurry-grown duckweed, and previous studies have not reported methane emissions from a similar system. Here, we report on GHG (methane, carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide) and ammonia emissions from duckweed grown on diluted cattle slurry measured in daylight and darkness, compared with emissions from diluted slurry without duckweed. We observed (i) initially high but rapidly declining methane emissions, independent of lighting or treatment, (ii) a net carbon dioxide fixation by duckweed, independent of lighting, (iii) high nitrous oxide emissions, independent of lighting, and (iv) a > 80% reduction of ammonia emissions by duckweed, independent of lighting. Our data shows potential of duckweed protein as a sustainable protein with 3.54 to 6.54 CO2eq kg− 1 protein, compared to faba bean (3.61 kg CO2eq kg− 1 protein) or barley protein (5.35 CO2eq kg− 1 protein). But despite the potential of slurry-grown duckweed as sustainable protein source, swapping ammonia volatilization for nitrous oxide emissions represents a limitation of the current system and mitigation strategies are needed.

Similar content being viewed by others

Optimal cultivation concentration of duckweed for pollutant removal from biogas slurry

Article Open access 12 February 2025

Low-carbon ammonia production is essential for resilient and sustainable agriculture

Article Open access 17 February 2025

Nitrogen management under increased atmospheric CO2 concentration in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.): ameliorating environmental impacts of fertilization

Article Open access 16 November 2021

Data availability

All relevant data is available in the manuscript, tables and figures.

References

  1. Richardson, K. et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broucek, J. Production of methane emissions from ruminant husbandry: A review. J. Environ. Prot. 5, 1482–1493 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amon, B., Kryvoruchko, V., Amon, T. & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 112, 153–162 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kupper, T. et al. Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from slurry storage–A review. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 300, 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106963 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Skinner, C. et al. The impact of long-term organic farming on soil-derived greenhouse gas emissions. Sci. Rep. 9, 1702. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38207-w (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pikaar, I. et al. Microbes and the next nitrogen revolution. Env. Sci. Technol. 51, 7297–7303 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Libutti, A. & Monteleone, M. Soil vs. groundwater: The quality dilemma. Managing nitrogen leaching and salinity control under irrigated agriculture in Mediterranean conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 186, 40–50 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Padilla, F. M., Gallardo, M. & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Global trends in nitrate leaching research in the 1960–2017 period. Sci. Total Environ. 643, 400–413 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, K. A. Changing views of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soil: key controlling processes and assessment at different spatial scales. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 68, 137–155 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leip, A. et al. Impacts of European livestock production: Nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorous, greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 115004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115004 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oron, G., Porath, D. & Jansen, H. Performance of the duckweed species Lemna gibba on municipal wastewater for effluent renovation and protein production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 29, 258–268 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, J., Cheng, J. J. & Stomp, A.-M. Growing Spirodela polyrrhiza in swine wastewater for the production of animal feed and fuel ethanol: A pilot study. CLEAN - Soil Air Water 40, 760–765 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Appenroth, K.-J. et al. Nutritional value of duckweeds (Lemnaceae) as human food. Food Chem. 217, 266–273 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leger, D. et al. Photovoltaic-driven microbial protein production can use land and sunlight more efficiently than conventional crops. PNAS 118, e2015025118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2015025118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stadtlander, T., Förster, S., Rosskothen, D. & Leiber, F. Slurry-grown duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza) as a means to recycle nitrogen into feed for rainbow trout fry. J. Clean. Prod. 228, 86–93 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stadtlander, T. et al. Dilution rates of cattle slurry affect ammonia uptake and protein production of duckweed grown in recirculating systems. J. Clean. Prod. 357, 131916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131916 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rojas, O. J., Liu, Y. & Stein, H. H. Concentration of metabolizable energy and digestibility of energy, phosphorus, and amino acids in lemna protein concentrate fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 5222–5229 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haustein, A. T. et al. Performance of broiler chickens fed diets containing duckweed (Lemna gibba). J. Agric. Sci. 122, 285–289 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson, K. E., Lowman, Z., Stomp, A.-M. & Chang, J. Duckweed as a feed ingredient in laying hen diets and its effect on egg production and composition. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 10, 4–7 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zetina-Córdoba, P. et al. Effect of cutting interval of Taiwan grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and partial substitution with duckweed (Lemna sp and Spirodela sp) on intake, digestibility and ruminal fermentation of Pelibuey lambs. Livest. Sci. 157, 471–477 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fiordelmondo, E. et al. Effects of partial substitution of conventional protein sources with duckweed (Lemna minor) meal in the feeding of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) on growth performances and the quality product. Plants 11, 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11091220 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stadtlander, T. et al. Partial replacement of fishmeal with duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza) in feed for two carnivorous fish species, Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Res. 2023, 1–15 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fasakin, E. A., Balogun, A. M. & Fasuru, B. E. Use of duckweed, Spirodela polyrrhiza L. Schleiden, as a protein feedstuff in practical diets for tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. Aquac. Res. 30, 313–318 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  24. de Matos, F. T. et al. Duckweed bioconversion and fish production in treated domestic wastewater. J. Appl. Aquac. 26, 49–59 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bairagi, A., Sarkar Ghosh, K., Sen, S. K. & Ray, A. K. Duckweed (Lemna polyrhiza) leaf meal as a source of feedstuff in formulated diets for rohu (Labeo rohita Ham) fingerlings after fermentation with a fish intestinal bacterium. Bioresour. Technol. 85, 17–24 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shrivastav, A. K. Effect of greater duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza supplemented feed on growth performance, digestive enzymes, amino and fatty acid profiles, and expression of genes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis of juvenile common carp Cyprinus carpio. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 788455. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.788455 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Appenroth, K.-J. et al. Nutritional value of the Duckweed species of the genus Wolffia (Lemnaceae) as human food. Front. Chem. 6, 483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00483 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parnian, A., Chorom, M., Jaafarzadeh, N. & Dinarvand, M. Use of two aquatic macrophytes for the removal of heavy metals from synthetic medium. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 16, 194–200 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iatrou, E. I., Stasinakis, A. S. & Aloupi, M. Cultivating duckweed Lemna minor in urine and treated domestic wastewater for simultaneous biomass production and removal of nutrients and antimicrobials. Ecol. Eng. 84, 632–639 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Baccio, D. D. et al. Response of Lemna gibba L. to high and environmentally relevant concentrations of ibuprofen: Removal, metabolism and morpho-physiological traits for biomonitoring of emerging contaminants. Sci. Total Environ. 584–585, 363–373 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cui, W. & Cheng, J. J. Growing duckweed for biofuel production: a review. Plant Biol. 17, 16–23 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Verma, R. & Suthar, S. Utility of duckweeds as source of biomass energy: A review. Bioenerg. Res. 8, 1589–1597 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Acosta, K. et al. Source of Vitamin B12 in plants of the Lemnaceae family and its production by duckweed-associated bacteria. J. Food Compos. Anal. 135, 106603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2024.106603 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jones, G., Scullion, J., Dalesman, S., Robson, P. & Gwynn-Jones, D. Acidification increases efficiency of Lemna minor N and P recovery from diluted cattle slurry. Clean. Waste Syst. 6, 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2023.100122 (2023a).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jones, G., Scullion, J., Dalesman, S., Robson, P. & Gwynn-Jones, D. Lowering pH enables duckweed (Lemna minor L.) growth on toxic concentrations of high-nutrient agricultural wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 395, 136392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136392 (2023b).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mohedano, R. A., Tonon, G., Costa, R. H. R., Pelissari, C. & Filho, P. B. Does duckweed ponds used for wastewater treatment emit or sequester greenhouse gases?. Sci. Total Environ. 691, 1043–1050 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silva, J. P., José, L. R., Miguel, R. P., Lubberding, H. & Gijzen, H. Influence of photoperiod on carbon dioxide and methane emissions from two pilot-scale stabilization ponds. Water Sci. Technol. 66, 1930–1940 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sims, A., Gajaraj, S. & Hu, Z. Nutrient removal and greenhouse gas emissions in duckweed treatment ponds. Water Res. 47, 1390–1398 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dai, J., Zhang, C., Lin, C.-H. & Hu, Z. Emission of carbon dioxide and methane from duckweed ponds for stormwater treatment. Water Environ. Res. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143015X14362865226310 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rabaey, J. & Cotner, J. Pond greenhouse gas emissions controlled by duckweed coverage. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 889289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.889289 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Devlamynck, R. et al. Agronomic and environmental performance of Lemna minor cultivated on agricultural wastewater streams—A practical approach. Sustainability 13, 1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031570 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mestayer, C. R., Culley, D. D. Jr., Standifer, L. C. & Koonce, K. L. Solar energy conversion efficiency and growth aspects of the duckweed, Spirodela punctata (G. F. W. Mey.) Thompson. Aquat. Bot. 19, 157–170 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ziegler, P., Adelmann, K., Zimmer, S., Schmidt, C. & Appenroth, K.-J. Relative in vitro growth rates of duckweeds (Lemnaceae) – the most rapidly growing higher plants. Plant Biol. 17, 33–41 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stadtlander, T., Schmidtke, A., Baki, C. & Leiber, F. Duckweed production on diluted chicken manure. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 33, 128–138 (2023). 

    Google Scholar 

  45. Prosser, J. I. Autotrophic nitrification in bacteria. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 30, 125–177 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lekang, O.-I. Aquaculture Engineering (ed Lekang, O.-I.) (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).

  47. Cedergreen, N. & Madsen, T. V. Nitrogen uptake by the floating macrophyte Lemna minor. New Phytol. 155, 285–292 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Yang, Y. et al. Measuring field ammonia emissions and canopy ammonia fluxes in agriculture using portable ammonia detector method. J. Clean. Prod. 216, 542–551 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yao, Y. et al. Duckweed (Spirodela polyrhiza) as green manure for increasing yield and reducing nitrogen loss in rice production. Field Crops Res. 214, 273–282 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sun, H. et al. Floating duckweed mitigated ammonia volatilization and increased grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of rice in biochar amended paddy soils. Chemosphere 237, 124532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124532 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hernandez, M. E. & Mitch, W. J. Influence of hydrologic pulses, flooding frequency, and vegetation on nitrous oxide emission from created riparian marshes. Wetlands 26, 862–877 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ugetti, E., García, J., Lind, S. E., Martikainen, P. J. & Ferrer, I. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from sludge treatment wetlands. Water Res. 46, 1755–1762 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ma, Y.-Y., Tong, C., Wang, W.-Q. & Zeng, C.-S. Effect of azolla on CH4 and N2O emissions in Fuzhou plain paddy fields. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 20, 723–727 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kimani, S. M. et al. Azolla cover significantly decreased CH4 but not N2O emissions from flooding rice paddy to atmosphere. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 64, 68–76 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gonzalez, A. D., Frostell, B. & Carlsson-Kanyama, A. Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: Potential contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation. Food Policy 36, 562–570 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Braglia, L. et al. New insights into interspecific hybridization in Lemna L. Sect. Lemna (Lemnaceae Martinov). Plants 10, 2767. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122767 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wang, C. Simultaneous analysis of greenhouse gases by gas chromatography. Agilent Technologies, accessible at: https://www.chem-agilent.com/pdf/5990-5129EN.pdf (2010).

  58. Fuss, R. & Hueppi, R. Greenhouse gas flux calculation from chamber measurements. Accessible at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gasfluxes/gasfluxes.pdf (2020).

  59. Hüppi, R. et al. Restricting the nonlinearity parameter in soil greenhouse gas flux calculation for more reliable flux estimates. PLoS ONE 13, e0200876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200876 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lee, H. & Romero, J. IPCC Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero) (IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023) 35–115 https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Mercator Foundation Switzerland and the Vontobel Foundation for their financial support for this study. Furthermore, we thank Dr. Laura Morello and her team for identifying the utilized duckweed species as Lemna minor. And finally, for his effort to bring light into the O2 mystery in the slurry-duckweed system, we would like to thank Jakob Zopfi.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Livestock Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse, Frick, Switzerland

    Timo Stadtlander, David Mauricio Gomez, Rebecca Müller, Cem Baki & Florian Leiber

  2. Agricultural Sciences and Resource Management in the Tropics and Subtropics (ARTS), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    David Mauricio Gomez & Nicolas Brueggemann

  3. Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany

    Nicolas Brueggemann

  4. Department of Soil Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Ackerstrasse, Frick, Switzerland

    Hans-Martin Krause & Lucilla Agostini

Authors
  1. Timo Stadtlander
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Mauricio Gomez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rebecca Müller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cem Baki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicolas Brueggemann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Florian Leiber
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hans-Martin Krause
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lucilla Agostini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.S.: Design of study, data acquisition, data analysis, writing of manuscript, revision of manuscript. D.M.G.: Design of study, data acquisition, data analysis. R.M.: Design of study, data acquisition, data analysis. C.B.: Data acquisition. N.B.: Design of study, revision of manuscript. F.L.: writing of manuscript, revision of manuscript. H.M.K.: data analysis, writing of manuscript, revision of manuscript. L.A.: Design of study, data acquisition, data analysis, writing of manuscript, revision of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timo Stadtlander.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Declaration of plant material procurement

Since Lemna minor is endemic to Switzerland and is not a protected species (IUCN status: least concern) and it is naturally growing on our own institute’s premises in rainwater ponds, it is not subject to any type of permission process (e.g. such as the Nagoya protocol) necessary for this type of research project. No voucher specimen has been deposited in a publicly available herbarium.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stadtlander, T., Gomez, D.M., Müller, R. et al. Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from duckweed cultivation systems using diluted liquid manure. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39270-4

Download citation

  • Received: 29 December 2024

  • Accepted: 03 February 2026

  • Published: 19 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39270-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Methane
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Nitrous oxide
  • Slurry
  • Protein carbon-dioxide equivalents
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research