Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Facial mark based biometric differentiation of identical twins using dynamic feature enhancement
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 February 2026

Facial mark based biometric differentiation of identical twins using dynamic feature enhancement

  • Khush Jay Brahmbhatt1,
  • Krishna Prakasha1 &
  • Gangothri Sanil1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 361 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

This comprehensive study demonstrates an advanced machine learning framework for distinguishing identical twins using facial skin marks, achieving 96.62% cross-validation accuracy and 90.6% AUC score. The methodology incorporates four distinct hyperparameter optimization techniques (random search, Bayesian optimization, particle swarm optimization, and grid search), comprehensive statistical validation, and a robust preprocessing pipeline including PCA and SMOTE. Analysis of 74 twin pairs from 319 processed images using automated facial mark detection and multi-metric similarity assessment reveals spatial distribution patterns as the primary discriminating factor. The framework employs sophisticated feature engineering (32\(\rightarrow\)15\(\rightarrow\)6 dimensions) and achieves statistically significant performance (p < 0.001) with minimal overfitting. Random search optimization emerged as the optimal method, providing the best performance-efficiency trade-off with 90.6% AUC, 88.4% test accuracy, and the fastest execution time (31.8s). The system demonstrates production-ready computational efficiency and establishes a reliable foundation for forensic biometric applications with comprehensive statistical validation and deployment specifications. Figure 1 depicts the graphical abstract.

Similar content being viewed by others

AIFS: an efficient face recognition method based on AI and enhanced few-shot learning

Article Open access 30 November 2025

FACEDIG automated tool for placing landmarks on facial portraits for geometric morphometrics users

Article Open access 07 July 2025

Efficient face information encryption and verification scheme based on full homomorphic encryption

Article Open access 03 April 2025

Data availability

The dataset used in this study, the ND-TWINS-2009-2010 database, is owned by a third party (the University of Notre Dame) and is subject to a specific license agreement. Therefore, the authors do not have the authority to share or distribute this data. Researchers interested in accessing the dataset must contact the original curators directly to obtain a license. Information on acquiring the dataset is available from the University of Notre Dame’s Computer Vision Research Laboratory (CVRL). Access to the ND-Twins-2009-2010 dataset requires a license agreement authorized by the university. The dataset can be requested through the following link: ND-Twins-2009-2010: [Online Access] - https://cvrl.nd.edu/projects/data/#nd-twins-2009-2010.

Abbreviations

AAM:

Active appearance models

AUC:

Area under the curve

CNN:

Convolutional neural networks

CV:

Cross-validation

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

FERET:

Facial recognition technology

FPR:

False positive rate

FRST:

Fast radial symmetry transform

GLCM:

Gray level co-occurrence matrix

Hog:

Histogram oriented of gradients

LBP:

Local binary pattern

LoG:

Laplacian-of-gaussian

MBE:

Multi-biometric evaluation

MRF:

Markov random field

ND TWINS:

Notre dame-twins

PCA:

Principal component analysis

PR:

Precision-recall

PSO:

Particle swarm optimization

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

RNN:

Recurrent neural networks

SIFT:

Scale invariant feature transform

SMOTE:

Synthetic minority oversampling technique

SMT:

Scars, marks and tattoos

SURF:

Speeded up robust features

ORB:

Oriented FAST and rotated BRIEF

TAR:

True accept rate

TPR:

True positive rate

XGBoost:

eXtreme gradient boosting

References

  1. Taskiran, M., Kahraman, N. & Erdem, C. E. Face recognition: Past, present, and future (a review). Digit. Signal Process. 106, 102809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102809 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kukharev, G. & Kaziyeva, N. Digital facial anthropometry: Application and implementation. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 30(3), 496–511 (2020).

  3. Kasyanyuk, V. Monozygotic or dizygotic twins. Types of twins. https://www.dreamstime.comhttps://www.dreamstime.com/monozygotic-dizygotic-twins-types-image168628172

  4. Jain, A. K., Prabhakar, S. & Pankanti, S. On the similarity of identical twin fingerprints. Pattern Recognit. 35(11), 2653–2663. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-3203(01)00218-7 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sundaresan, V. & Shanthi, S. Monozygotic twin face recognition: An in-depth analysis and plausible improvements. Image Vision Comput. 116, 104331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2021.104331 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rehkha, K. K. & Vinod, V. A literary survey on multimodal biometric identification of monozygotic twins. in Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 385–398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8221-9_36

  7. Thomas, N. S. E. S, B., Kizhakkethottam, J. J. & Kizhakkethottam, J. J. Analysis of effective biometric identification on monozygotic twins, In 2015 International Conference on Soft-Computing and Networks Security (ICSNS) (Coimbatore, India, Feb. 2015), https://doi.org/10.1109/icsns.2015.7292444.

  8. Chijindu, A. T. & Chinagolum I. Machine learning-based digital recognition of identical twins to support global crime investigation. Int. J. Latest Technol. Eng. Manag. Appl. Sci. (IJLTEMAS), 7, 18–25 (2018).

  9. Share, C., Williams, L. & Graham, J. Identical twins arrested following rare coin shop burglary, car chase, Orange County Register (Nov. 19, 2017). https://www.ocregister.com/2017/11/19/two-burglary-suspects-fleeing-police-on-55-freeway-are-caught-hiding-in-a-ditch/

  10. Abubakar, S. Nigeria’s Boko Haram leader is dead, say rival militants, News, Jun. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-57378493

  11. Sundaresan, V. & Amala Shanthi, S. Monozygotic twin face recognition: An in-depth analysis and plausible improvements. Image Vision Comput. 116, 104331 (2021).

  12. Zeinstra, C. G., Meuwly, D., Ruifrok, A. C. C., Veldhuis, R. N. J. & Spreeuwers, L. J. Forensic face recognition as a means to determine the strength of evidence: A survey. Forensic Sci. Rev. 30(1), 21–32 (2018).

  13. Phillips, P. J. et al. Distinguishing identical twins by face recognition. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG) (IEEE, Mar. 2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/fg.2011.5771395.

  14. Klare, B., Paulino, A. A. & Jain, A. K. Analysis of facial features in identical twins. In 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) (IEEE, Oct. 2011), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ijcb.2011.6117548.

  15. Bowyer, K. W. & Flynn, P. J. Biometric identification of identical twins: A survey. In IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS) (IEEE, Sep. 2016), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/btas.2016.7791176.

  16. Sanil, G., Prakash, K., Prabhu, S., Nayak, V. C. & Sengupta, S. 2D-3D Facial image analysis for identification of facial features using machine learning algorithms with hyper-parameter optimization for forensics applications. IEEE Access 11, 82521–82538 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3298443

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanil, G., Prakasha, K., Prabhu, S. & Nayak, V. Facial similarity measure for recognizing monozygotic twins utilizing 3D facial landmarks, efficient geodesic distance computation, and machine learning algorithms. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3439572.

  18. Sanil, G., Prakash, K., Prabhu, S. & Nayak, V. C. Effectiveness of the use of golden ratio in identifying similar faces using ensemble learning. In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 62–80, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1166-8_6.

  19. Mousavi, S., Charmi, M. & Hassanpoor, H. Recognition of identical twins based on the most distinctive region of the face: Human criteria and machine processing approaches. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80(10), 15765–15802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10360-3 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sanil, G., Prakasha, K., Prabhu, S. & Nayak, V. C. Region-wise landmarks-based feature extraction employing SIFT, SURF, and ORB feature descriptors to recognize monozygotic twins from 2D/3D facial images. F1000Research. 14, 444. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.162911.1 (2025).

  21. Sanil, G., Prakasha, K., Prabhu, S. & Nayak, V. C. Area-based face curve characteristic analysis to recognize multimodal 2D/3D monozygotic twins using Simpson’s rule and machine learning. Syst. Soft Comput., 23, 200267 (2025).

  22. Sami, S. M., McCauley, J., Soleymani, S., Nasrabadi, N. M. & Dawson, J. Benchmarking human face similarity using identical twins. IET Biometrics 11(5), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1049/bme2.12090 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mousavi, S., Charmi, M. & Hassanpoor, H. A distinctive landmark-based face recognition system for identical twins by extracting novel weighted features. Comput. Electr. Eng. 94, 107326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107326 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nahar, K. M. O., Abul-Huda, B., Bataineh, A. Al. & Al-Khatib, R. M. Twins and similar faces recognition using geometric and photometric features with transfer learning. Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst. 11(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/110110 (2022).

  25. Rehkha, K. K. Differentiating monozygotic twins by facial features. Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ. (TURCOMAT) 12(10), 1467–1476. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i10.4468 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sudhakar, K., & Nithyanandam, P. Facial identification of twins based on fusion score method. J. Ambient Intell. Humanized Comput. 15(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03012-3 (2021).

  27. Vengatesan, K., Kumar, A., Karuppuchamy, V., Shaktivel, R. & Singhal, A. Face recognition of identical twins based on support vector machine classifier. In 2019 Third International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1109/I-SMAC47947.2019.9032548 (2019).

  28. Nafees, M. & Uddin, J. A twin prediction method using facial recognition feature. In 2018 International Conference on Computer, Communication, Chemical, Material and Electronic Engineering (IC4ME2). https://doi.org/10.1109/ic4me2.2018.8465615

  29. Afaneh, A., Noroozi, F. & Toygar, Ö. Recognition of identical twins using a fusion of various facial feature extractors. Eurasip J. Image Video Process. 2017(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-017-0231-0 (2017).

  30. Monnappa, D. S. & Maheshappa, S. Twin-based face differentiation using facial marks. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 4(6), 302–306 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guo, Y., Wang, H., Wang, L., Lei, Y., Liu, L., & Bennamoun, M. 3D face recognition: Two decades of progress and prospects. ACM Comput.Surv. 56(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.1145/3615863 (2024).

  32. Jain, A. K. & Park, U. Facial marks: Soft biometric for face recognition. In ICIP’09: Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, 37–40 (Nov. 2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/icip.2009.5413921

  33. Lee, J.-E., Jain, A. K. & Jin, R. Scars, marks and tattoos (SMT): Soft biometrics for suspect and victim identification. In Proc. 2008 Biometrics Symposium (Tampa, FL, USA, 2008), 1–8.

  34. Prema, R. & Shanmugapriya, P. Facial marks are soft biometric for identification of identical twins, similar faces, and siblings in face recognition. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. (IJSRSET) 5(1), 64–69 (2018).

  35. Srinivas, N., Aggarwal, G., Flynn, P. J. & Bruegge, R. W. V. Analysis of facial marks to distinguish between identical twins. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 7(5), 1536–1550. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2012.2206027 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Suresh, K. Feature extraction techniques for identical twins fraud detection using machine learning. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science 6(4), 5190–5198 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, L. Explainable AI for biometric twin differentiation: Interpretable deep learning with visual attention maps. IEEE Trans. Biometrics Behav. Identity Sci. 7(1), 45–58 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ahmad, B., Usama, M., Lu, J., Xiao, W., Wan, J. & Yang, J. Deep convolutional neural network using triplet loss to distinguish the identical twins. In 2019 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) (IEEE, 2019), 1–6.

  39. Yuan, Y. & Bowyer, K.W. A siamese network to detect if two iris images are monozygotic. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09749 (2025).

  40. Abed, M. H. & Sztahó, D. Effect of identical twins on deep speaker embeddings based forensic voice comparison. Int. J. Speech Technol. 27(2), 341–351 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ferreira, F. R., do Couto, L. M., de Melo Baptista Domingues, G. Comparing the efficiency of YOLO-M for face recognition in images and videos degraded by compression artifacts. Evolv. Syst. 16(2), 70 (2025).

  42. Negi, A., Kumar, K., Chauhan, P. & Rajput, R. S. Deep neural architecture for face mask detection on simulated masked face dataset against covid-19 pandemic. In 2021 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), 595–600 (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/icccis51004.2021.9397196

  43. Negi, A., Chauhan, P., Kumar, K. & Rajput, R. S. Face mask detection classifier and model pruning with keras-surgeon. In 2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE) (Dec. 2020), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icraie51050.2020.9358337

  44. Negi, A. & Kumar, K. Face mask detection in real-time video stream using deep learning. Computat. Intell. Healthcare Inf. 7, 255–68 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stefanik, R. ND-TWINS-2009-2010. 2013. [Online]. https://cvrl.nd.edu/projects/data/

  46. Kittipongdaja, P. Skin-Problem-Detection-Multiple-Clean Dataset. [Online]. Available: https://universe.roboflow.com/parin-kittipongdaja-vwmn3/skin-problem-detection-multiple-clean Accessed: Jun. 18, 2025.

  47. Fabian, P. et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  48. B. Jason, Hyperparameter optimization with random search and grid search. Machine Learning Mastery, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://machinelearningmastery.com/hyperparameter-optimization-with-random-search-and-grid-search/

  49. N. V, A Hands-On discussion on hyperparameter optimization Techniques. Analytics Vidhya, Oct. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2021/09/a-hands-on-discussion-on-hyperparameter-optimization-techniques/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the University of Notre Dame, United States (UND), for sharing the ND-TWINS-2009–2010 Dataset.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal. The author(s) declare that no agency has funded this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manipal Institute of Technology (MIT), Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India

    Khush Jay Brahmbhatt, Krishna Prakasha & Gangothri Sanil

Authors
  1. Khush Jay Brahmbhatt
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Krishna Prakasha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gangothri Sanil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mr. Khush Jay Brahmbhatt: Writing—Original draft preparation; Dr. Gangothri Sanil: Writing—Reviewing and Editing; Dr. Krishna Prakasha: Supervision; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Krishna Prakasha or Gangothri Sanil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study involved the analysis of a third-party, controlled-access dataset: the ND-TWINS-2009-2010 database, collected and curated by the University of Notre Dame (UND). The original data collection was conducted with ethical approval and informed consent from participants and/or their legal guardians, as detailed by the data source. Our research team’s use of the dataset was performed in strict accordance with a signed license agreement with UND, which governs data privacy and security protocols. This agreement is attached for the editor’s reference.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brahmbhatt, K.J., Prakasha, K. & Sanil, G. Facial mark based biometric differentiation of identical twins using dynamic feature enhancement. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39470-y

Download citation

  • Received: 12 September 2025

  • Accepted: 05 February 2026

  • Published: 16 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39470-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics