Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Age-dependent efficiency of magnetic drug targeting in young and old patient-specific aortic models
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 09 February 2026

Age-dependent efficiency of magnetic drug targeting in young and old patient-specific aortic models

  • Seyed Behzad Hosseini1,
  • Wala Almosawy2,3,
  • Rasoul Karimi Takrami4,
  • Negar Abdi5 &
  • …
  • Saman Aminian6 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 863 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing
  • Medical research
  • Nanoscience and technology

Abstract

Magnetic drug targeting (MDT) offers a non-invasive and localized approach for improving therapeutic delivery in vascular diseases, but its efficiency is strongly affected by age-related hemodynamic changes. In this study, a computational framework was employed to compare MDT performance in young and old patient-specific aortic models reconstructed from clinical imaging. Blood was modeled using non-Newtonian Carreau, Power-law, and Casson-Papanastasiou rheologies, while nanoparticle motion was simulated under external magnetic fields ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 T. Across all rheological models, capture efficiency (CE) increased with particle size and magnetic field intensity. Importantly, older patients consistently exhibited slightly higher CE than younger patients, a trend driven by their reduced flow velocity, enlarged aortic lumen, and lower wall shear stress, which collectively prolonged nanoparticle residence time and reduced hydrodynamic drag opposing magnetic capture. For example, under a 1.5 T field using the Carreau model, CE reached 8.7% for 1000 nm particles in both young and old patients, but at intermediate intensities (0.5–1.25 T), older patients showed higher CE (e.g., 2.4% vs. 2.1% at 0.5 T, and 7.3% vs. 6.6% at 1.25 T). Newtonian rheology consistently over-predicted CE relative to non-Newtonian models. All applied magnetic field strengths remained within clinically acceptable safety thresholds, and field localization coincided with the target region of interest. These findings demonstrate that vascular aging enhances magnetophoretic drug capture under realistic hemodynamic conditions and underscore the need for age-aware optimization in patient-specific MDT strategies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Clinical symbiosis of hybrid nanoparticles and induced magnetic field on heat and mass transfer in multiple stenosed artery with erratic thrombosis

Article Open access 20 September 2023

Machine learning- a new paradigm in nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery to cancerous tissues through the human cardiovascular system enhanced by magnetic field

Article Open access 27 September 2024

Quantitative analysis of ferrohydrodynamics of blood containing magnetic nanocarriers for advanced drug delivery design via hybrid machine learning

Article Open access 14 October 2025

Data availability

The datasets produced and evaluated throughout the present work are available from the corresponding author for reasonable requests. For ethical reasons and patient confidentiality, we cannot share individual-level medical imaging data publicly; thus, it is not available. Notwithstanding, processed simulation data along with the scripts to evaluate and support the findings of this study are available from the authors for reasonable requests.

References

  1. Buja, L. M., Zhao, B., Vela, D., Segura, A. & Narula, N. Pathobiology of aortic aneurysms and dissections: synthesis of recent investigations and evolving insights. JACC: Adv. 4, 101682 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrer, M., Altadill, F., Tabilo, J. & Barros, A. Impact of age-related arterial degeneration and inflammation on the presentation and etiopathogenesis of acute aortic syndrome. Eur. Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 13, zuae036 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alcorn, H. G., Wolfson, S. K. Jr, Sutton-Tyrrell, K., Kuller, L. H. & O’Leary, D. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in older adults enrolled in the cardiovascular health study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 16, 963–970 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maleszewski, J. J. Inflammatory ascending aortic disease: perspectives from pathology. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 149, S176–S183 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czerny, M. et al. Current options and recommendations for the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease: an expert consensus document of the European society for cardiology (ESC) working group of cardiovascular surgery, the ESC working group on aorta and peripheral vascular Diseases, the European association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC and the European association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 59, 65–73 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Organization, W. H. World health organization fact sheets on cardiovascular diseases. World Health Organ. Fact. Sheet N 317 (2015).

  7. Ferreira, J. P. et al. World heart federation roadmap for heart failure. Global Heart. 14, 197–214 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Le Huu, A. et al. Endovascular therapy for patients with heritable thoracic aortic disease. Annals Cardiothorac. Surg. 11, 31 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Afilalo, J. et al. Addition of frailty and disability to cardiac surgery risk scores identifies elderly patients at high risk of mortality or major morbidity. Circulation: Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes. 5, 222–228 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tu, L. et al. Targeted drug delivery systems for atherosclerosis. J. Nanobiotechnol. 23, 306 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lübbe, A. S., Alexiou, C. & Bergemann, C. Clinical applications of magnetic drug targeting. J. Surg. Res. 95, 200–206 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shirvalilou, S. et al. Development of a magnetic nano-graphene oxide carrier for improved glioma-targeted drug delivery and imaging: in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Chemico-Biol. Interact. 295, 97–108 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xu, Z., Mousavi, T. & Ainslie, M. Numerical simulation of magnetic drug targeting for lung cancer therapy using a bulk superconducting magnet. Drug Deliv. 32, 2490836 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hua, M. Y. et al. Magnetic-nanoparticle-modified Paclitaxel for targeted therapy for prostate cancer. Biomaterials 31, 7355–7363 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Issa, B., Qadri, S., Obaidat, I. M., Bowtell, R. W. & Haik, Y. PEG coating reduces NMR relaxivity of Mn0. 5Zn0. 5Gd0. 02Fe1. 98O4 hyperthermia nanoparticles. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 34, 1192–1198 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Furlani, E. & Ng, K. Analytical model of magnetic nanoparticle transport and capture in the microvasculature. Phys. Rev. E—Statistical Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys. 73, 061919 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ardalan, A., Aminian, S., Seyfaee, A. & Gharehkhani, S. Effects of geometrical parameters on the capture efficiency of nanoparticles under the influence of the magnetic field in a stenosed vessel. Powder Technol. 380, 39–46 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sodagar, H., Sodagar-Abardeh, J., Shakiba, A. & Niazmand, H. Numerical study of drug delivery through the 3D modeling of aortic arch in presence of a magnetic field. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 20, 787–802 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barnsley, L. C., Carugo, D., Aron, M. & Stride, E. Understanding the dynamics of superparamagnetic particles under the influence of high field gradient arrays. Phys. Med. Biol. 62, 2333 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hewlin, R. L. Jr & Tindall, J. M. Computational assessment of magnetic nanoparticle targeting efficiency in a simplified circle of Willis arterial model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 2545 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hewlin, R. L. Jr, Smith, M. & Kizito, J. P. Computational assessment of unsteady flow effects on magnetic nanoparticle targeting efficiency in a magnetic stented carotid bifurcation artery. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 14, 694–712 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alizadeh, A. et al. Numerical investigation of the injection angle of carrier nanoparticles under the effect of different magnetic fields. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 578, 170836 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jalali, S., Jalali, S. & Barati, E. Pulsatile blood flow simulations of magnetic drug targeting (MDT) for drug particles dispersion through stenosis asymmetric and symmetric vessels. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 590, 171649 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma, B. K., Khanduri, U., Kumawat, C. & Duraihem, F. Z. Simulation of Magnetically Targeted Drug Delivery for Two-Phase Blood Flow in Stenotic Arteries Under Hall and Ion Influence. Advanced Theory and Simulations, e00208 (2025).

  25. Hussain, M. A., Kar, S. & Puniyani, R. R. Relationship between power law coefficients and major blood constituents affecting the whole blood viscosity. J. Biosci. 24, 329–337 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Boyd, J., Buick, J. M. & Green, S. Analysis of the Casson and Carreau-Yasuda non-Newtonian blood models in steady and oscillatory flows using the lattice Boltzmann method. Physics Fluids 19, 93–103 (2007).

  27. Aminian, S., Najafi, M., Saadat, H. & Ashjaee, M. Computational study of halbach-array-driven magnetic targeting for aortic tumor using Non-Newtonian blood flow models. Comput. Biol. Med. 195, 110580 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Papanastasiou, T. C. Flows of materials with yield. J. Rheol. 31, 385–404 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Könözsy, L. Z. & Multiphysics CFD modelling of incompressible flows at low and moderate Reynolds numbers. (2012).

  30. Ranjbari, L., Zarei, K., Alizadeh, A., Hosseini, O. & Aminian, S. Three-dimensional investigation of capturing particle considering particle-RBCs interaction under the magnetic field produced by an Halbach array. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 79, 104046 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tamboli, N. K. & Murallidharan, J. S. Numerical studies on magnetic driven targeted drug delivery in human vasculature. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 104, 111–145 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Turton, R. & Levenspiel, O. A short note on the drag correlation for spheres. Powder Technol. 47, 83–86 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xia, Y. et al. Hemodynamic characteristics of dilated ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 20, 354 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Takeda, S., Mishima, F., Terazono, B., Izumi, Y. & Nishijima, S. Development of magnetic force-assisted gene transfer system using biopolymer-coated ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 7, 308–314 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Van Ooij, P. et al. Age-related changes in aortic 3D blood flow velocities and wall shear stress: implications for the identification of altered hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve disease. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 43, 1239–1249 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pagoulatou, S. & Stergiopulos, N. Evolution of aortic pressure during normal ageing: A model-based study. PLoS One. 12, e0182173 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bina, A., Siavashi, M. & Beigzadeh, B. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of magnetic drug delivery in carotid artery with Eulerian-Lagrangian method: injection point and magnetic field performance analysis. Journal Magnetism Magn. Materials, 628, 164–173 (2025).

  38. Fanelli, C., Kaouri, K., Phillips, T. N., Myers, T. G. & Font, F. Magnetic nanodrug delivery in non-Newtonian blood flows. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 26, 74 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yadeta, H. B. & Shaw, S. Unsteady fractional dispersion under controlled targeted drug elimination and non-Newtonian rheology. Nonlinear Dynamics, 113, 21181–21197 (2025).

  40. Manshadi, M., Mohammadi, M. & Sanati-Nezhad, A. Investigation of non-Newtonian blood effects on magnetic drug delivery for chemotherapy applications in an artery vessel. Anal. Comput. Theor. Chem. Lett. 1, 8–14 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bose, S., Datta, A., Ganguly, R. & Banerjee, M. Implant assisted magnetic drug targetting for non-Newtonian blood flow. (2023).

  42. Lunnoo, T. & Puangmali, T. Capture efficiency of biocompatible magnetic nanoparticles in arterial flow: A computer simulation for magnetic drug targeting. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10, 426 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kenjereš, S. & Righolt, B. Simulations of magnetic capturing of drug carriers in the brain vascular system. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow. 35, 68–75 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aryan, H., Beigzadeh, B. & Siavashi, M. Euler-Lagrange numerical simulation of improved magnetic drug delivery in a three-dimensional CT-based carotid artery bifurcation. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 219, 106778 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Seyed Behzad Hosseini

  2. College of science, Department of chemistry, University of Kerbala, Karbala, Iraq

    Wala Almosawy

  3. College of Science, University of Warith Al- Anbiyaa, Karbala, 56001, Iraq

    Wala Almosawy

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, La.C, Lahijan, Iran

    Rasoul Karimi Takrami

  5. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

    Negar Abdi

  6. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

    Saman Aminian

Authors
  1. Seyed Behzad Hosseini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wala Almosawy
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rasoul Karimi Takrami
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Negar Abdi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Saman Aminian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Seyed Majid Hosseini: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Wala Almosawy: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing; Rasoul Karimi Takrami: Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources; Negar Abdi: Data curation, Validation, Writing – review & editing; Saman Aminian: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saman Aminian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, S.B., Almosawy, W., Takrami, R.K. et al. Age-dependent efficiency of magnetic drug targeting in young and old patient-specific aortic models. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39486-4

Download citation

  • Received: 27 September 2025

  • Accepted: 05 February 2026

  • Published: 09 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39486-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Capture efficiency
  • Aortic tumor
  • Casson-Papanastasiou
  • CFD
  • Nanoparticles
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics