Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Elbow flexion enables rescuers with low BMI to deliver chest compressions in compliance with CPR guideline recommendations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 February 2026

Elbow flexion enables rescuers with low BMI to deliver chest compressions in compliance with CPR guideline recommendations

  • Katherine Thurlow1,
  • Lucas Rehnberg2,3,
  • Jelena Ivetić4,
  • Thais Russomano3,5,6 &
  • …
  • Snezana Levic1,7 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 165 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Medical research
  • Physiology

Abstract

High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival outcomes. Smaller rescuers have been found to be at risk of providing inadequate CPR, particularly relating to chest compression depth, especially in novice rescuers. This study aims to look at the quality of CPR provided by smaller rescuers, and to investigate any potential compensation techniques used such as elbow flexion and extension, to maintain adequate quality CPR. Healthy adult participants performed three five-minute sequences of CPR on a mannequin with springs of 3 different strengths, in a randomized order. An electrogoniometer attached to the elbow measured the flexion and extension throughout. The results suggest that chest compressions were maintained at recommended depth and rate levels despite the increase in spring stiffness by using elbow flexion and extension, especially in participants with lower BMI and increased spring stiffness. These findings suggest potential compensatory mechanisms that can be used to maintain good CPR in situations of the rescuer being significantly smaller than the patient, similarly to as has been suggested when delivering CPR in hypogravity, thus transferring knowledge from these environments to Earth. Using elbow flexion and extension should be taken into consideration when revising the internationally recognized CPR guidelines.

Similar content being viewed by others

Chest compression quality decreases in hypoxic conditions simulating an airliner cabin at cruising altitude: a randomized, controlled, double-blind Manikin Study

Article Open access 29 October 2024

A two-rescuer-method significantly alters CPR-quality during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an airliner cabin - a randomized, controlled manikin trial

Article Open access 10 December 2025

Shoulder strap fixation of LUCAS-2 to facilitate continuous CPR during non-supine (stair) stretcher transport of OHCAs patients

Article Open access 10 May 2021

Data availability

All data is available in the main text and supplementary figures.

References

  1. Wyckoff, M. H. 2022 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: Summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; pediatric life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; and first aid task forces. Circulation. 146, e483–e557 (2022).

  2. Perkins, C. et al. (Resuscitation Council UK, 2021).

  3. Overbeek, R. et al. Alternative techniques for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in extreme environments—A scoping review. Resusc. Plus. 20, 100762 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krittanawong, C. et al. Human health during space travel: State-of-the-art review. Cells. 12, (2022).

  5. Hinkelbein, J. et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during spaceflight—a guideline for CPR in microgravity from the German society of aerospace medicine (DGLRM) and the European society of aerospace medicine space medicine group (ESAM-SMG). Scand. J. Trauma. Resusc. Emerg. Med. 28, 108 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Overbeek, R. et al. Effectiveness of CPR in hypogravity conditions—a systematic review. Life (Basel) 12, (2022).

  7. Mackaill, C. et al. A new method for the performance of external chest compressions during hypogravity simulation. Life Sci. Space Res. (Amst). 18, 72–79 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oh, J. H. & Kim, C. W. Relationship between chest compression depth and novice rescuer body weight during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 34, 2411–2413 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krikscionaitiene, A. et al. Can lightweight rescuers adequately perform CPR according to 2010 resuscitation guideline requirements? Emerg. Med. J. 30, 159–160 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, H. et al. Association between body mass index and outcomes in patients with return of spontaneous circulation after Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 18, (2021).

  11. Powell-Wiley, T. M. et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 143, e984–e1010 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. C. o. Nursing, The UK nursing labour market review 2018.

  13. R. C. UK, CPR in Schools (2021).

  14. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G. & Buchner, A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods. 39, 175–191 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Borg, G. A. Perceived exertion. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2, 131–153 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meaney, P. A. et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: [corrected] improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: a consensus statement from the American heart association. Circulation 128, 417–435 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abella, B. S. et al. Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 111, 428–434 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stiell, I. G. et al. What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation? Crit. Care Med. 40, 1192–1198 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kao, C. L. et al. Effect of thoracic stiffness on chest compression performance - A prospective randomized crossover observational manikin study. Heliyon 8, e10990 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trowbridge, C. et al. A randomized cross-over study of the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among females performing 30:2 and hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BMC Nurs. 8, 6 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lancaster, G. D., Stilley, J. D. & Franke, W. D. How does rescuer fitness affect the quality of prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Prehosp Emerg. Care. 26, 195–203 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abelairas-Gómez, C. et al. The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Kardiol Pol. 75, 21–27 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Joe Emory and Pippa Moore for providing facilities and CPR training to the participants.

Funding

This work was supported by Medical Research Council grant MR/ N004299/1 (SL), Brighton and Sussex Medical School Independent Research Project Stipend (KT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9PX, UK

    Katherine Thurlow & Snezana Levic

  2. General Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK

    Lucas Rehnberg

  3. InnovaSpace, London, SE28 0LZ, UK

    Lucas Rehnberg & Thais Russomano

  4. Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

    Jelena Ivetić

  5. Space Technology Center, AGH University of Krakow, Kraków, Poland

    Thais Russomano

  6. School of Medicine, CEMA, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Thais Russomano

  7. Sensory Neuroscience Research Group, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Brighton, Huxley Building, Brighton, BN2 4GJ, UK

    Snezana Levic

Authors
  1. Katherine Thurlow
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucas Rehnberg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jelena Ivetić
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thais Russomano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Snezana Levic
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.T.: performed experiments, analyzed data and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. L.R.: analyzed data and reviewed and edited the manuscript. J.I.: analyzed data and reviewed and edited the manuscript, T.R.: study design, performed experiments, data analysis and reviewed and edited the manuscript. S.L.: study design, performed experiments, analyzed data and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Thais Russomano or Snezana Levic.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thurlow, K., Rehnberg, L., Ivetić, J. et al. Elbow flexion enables rescuers with low BMI to deliver chest compressions in compliance with CPR guideline recommendations. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39671-5

Download citation

  • Received: 04 July 2024

  • Accepted: 06 February 2026

  • Published: 18 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39671-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Hypogravity
  • BMI
  • Elbow flexion
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing