Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Investigation on the cutting-infiltration integrated strategy based on medical waterjet for targeted drug delivery
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 February 2026

Investigation on the cutting-infiltration integrated strategy based on medical waterjet for targeted drug delivery

  • Yukun Lan1,2,
  • Wenchuan Liu1,2,
  • Jiren Tang1,2,
  • Hong Li3,
  • Shuaikang Chang1,2 &
  • …
  • Guiqiang Hao3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1064 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Engineering
  • Health care
  • Medical research
  • Oncology
  • Optics and photonics

Abstract

The integration of cutting and anesthesia within a single surgical instrument presents a significant opportunity to increase precision and reduce mechanical injury. This study introduces an innovative integrated water jet system that synergistically combines tissue dissection with localized drug delivery. A dedicated experimental platform was developed on the basis of hydrodynamic principles, enabling synchronous cutting and anesthesia. Systematic evaluations were conducted through cutting-diffusion experiments, tissue surface morphology analysis, and spatial diffusion tracking of anesthetics via photoacoustic imaging. The results demonstrated a nonlinear positive correlation between jet parameters (pressure and nozzle diameter) and both the cutting depth and diffusion distance. The optimal performance was achieved at distinct parameters for different tissue types: 4 MPa with a 0.2 mm nozzle for muscle tissue, and 8 MPa with a 0.2 mm nozzle for adipose tissue. Compared with conventional scalpel excision, the water jet technique significantly reduced tissue damage, as evidenced by a 51% reduction in fiber breakage and a 35% decrease in damaged area, while preserving up to 39.45 μm of functional structure. Furthermore, photoacoustic imaging revealed nonmonotonic diffusion dynamics of the anesthetic, with the maximum diffusion distance occurring adjacent to the cutting depth (18.31 ± 2 mm), confirming a “cutting-guided diffusion” mechanism. These findings establish a foundational framework for device-drug synergy in surgery, advancing the development of multifunctional, minimally invasive technologies.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from thecorresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Hajilo, P., Imani, B., Zandi, S. & Mehrafshan, A. Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery. Front. Surg. 10, 1264519 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elmore, L. et al. Evaluating the healing potential of J-plasma scalpel-created surgical incisions in Porcine and rat models. Biomedicines 12, 277 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barati, B. et al. Scalpel versus electrocautery skin incisions in postauricular tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial study. Egypt. J. Otolaryngol. 41, 105 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hreha, P. et al. Water jet technology used in medicine. Tehnicki Vjesn. 17, 237–240 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Papachristou, D. N. & Barters, R. Resection of the liver with a water jet. Br. J. Surg. 69, 93–94 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hata, Y. et al. Liver resection in children, using a water-jet. J. Pediatr. Surg. 29, 648–650 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Une, Y. et al. Liver resection using a water jet. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 23, 74–S77 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Izumi, R. et al. Hepatic resection using a water jet dissector. Surg. Today. 23, 31–35 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rau, H., Duessel, A. & Wurzbacher, S. The use of water-jet dissection in open and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB 10, 275–280 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gilling, P. J. et al. Five-year outcomes for aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a double-blind, randomized trial in men with LUTS due to BPH. Can. J. Urol. 29, 10960–10968 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elterman, D. et al. Meta-analysis with individual data of functional outcomes following aquablation for lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH in various prostate anatomies. BMJ Surg. Interventions Health Technol. 3, e000090 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen, D. D. et al. Waterjet ablation therapy for endoscopic resection of prostate tissue trial (WATER) vs WATER II: comparing aquablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in 30–80 and 80–150 mL prostates. BJU Int. 125, 112–122 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cecinato, P. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in colorectal neoplasia performed with a waterjet system-assisted knife: higher en-bloc resection rate than conventional technique. Clin. Endoscopy. 55, 775–783 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kotecha, K. et al. Waterjet pulse lavage as a safe adjunct to video assisted retroperitoneal debridement in necrotising pancreatitis. Surg. Endosc. 38, 6973–6979 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wormald, J. C., Wade, R. G., Dunne, J. A., Collins, D. P. & Jain, A. Hydrosurgical debridement versus conventional surgical debridement for acute partial-thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2020).

  16. Shimada, K., Ojima, Y., Ida, Y. & Matsumura, H. Efficacy of Versajet hydrosurgery system in chronic wounds: a systematic review. Int. Wound J. 18, 269–278 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xia, L. et al. A retrospective cohort study comparing the clinical outcomes of the hydrosurgery system and traditional Single-Incision surgery for axillary osmidrosis. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 24, e16755 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moon, B. & Kim, Y. J. Comparison of effectiveness and associated complications between conventional subdermal excision and hydrosurgery (VersajetTM) for osmidrosis. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 45, 3029–3036 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Azab, M. A., Sarhan, K., Atallah, O., Kammoun, B. & Hazim, A. Slicing through complexity: a systematic review assessing the efficacy and safety of water-jet dissection in neurosurgical procedures with technical suggestions. Neurosurg. Rev. 48, 432 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, J., Song, X. F., Wei, X., Yu, W. & Jing, X. Non-rigid cutting characteristics and separation mechanisms of soft muscle tissue under waterjet impact. Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part. H: J. Eng. Med. 239, 485–497 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Babaiasl, M. et al. Predictive mechanics-based model for depth of cut (DOC) of waterjet in soft tissue for waterjet-assisted medical applications. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 58, 1845–1872 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Srivastava, A., Kundu, A. & Paul, A. R. A detailed review of the recent development of needle-free drug delivery devices. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2025, 1–20 (2025).

  23. Zhu, Y., Kang, C., Cai, W. & Huang, C. Drug injection and dispersion characteristics of an air-powered needle-free injector. Med. Eng. Phys. 109, 103906 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jing, Y., Magnin, I. E. & Frindel, C. Monte Carlo simulation of water diffusion through cardiac tissue models. Med. Eng. Phys. 120, 104013 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caine, M. et al. In situ evaluation of Spatiotemporal distribution of doxorubicin from Drug-eluting beads in a tissue mimicking Phantom. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 160, 105772 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mathias, E. V., Aponte, J., Kornfield, J. A. & Ba, Y. Properties of small molecular drug loading and diffusion in a fluorinated PEG hydrogel studied by 1 H molecular diffusion NMR and 19 F spin diffusion NMR. Colloid Polym. Sci. 288, 1655–1663 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bálint, Š. et al. Diffusion and cellular uptake of drugs in live cells studied with surface-enhanced Raman scattering probes. J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 027005–027005 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abrahams, M. S., Panzer, O., Atchabahian, A., Horn, J. L. & Brown, A. R. Case report: limitation of local anesthetic spread during ultrasound-guided interscalene block. Description of an anatomic variant with clinical correlation. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 33, 357–359 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tsutsumi, A., Umehara, K., Ono, H. & Kawakami, N. Types of psychosocial job demands and adverse events due to dental mismanagement: a cross sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 7, 1–6 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Šimek, J., Šmejkal, K., Jakl, M. & Trlica, J. Systemic toxic effects of Mesocain® in routine surgical practice upon iatrogenic overdose requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation-case report. Rozhledy V Chirurgii: Mesicnik Ceskoslovenske Chirurgicke Spolecnosti. 102, 257–260 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wong, S. et al. Image analysis comparison of nerve staining with food dye, methylene blue or tissue marker. Veterinary Anaesth. Analg. 51, 35–43 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao, J. et al. Tissue-Selective separation mechanism of Multi-type soft tissues under waterjet impact for Low-Trauma cutting surgery. J. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 53, 2612–2625 (2025).

  33. Derakhshan, R., Ahmadian, M., Chizari, M. & Samimiardestani, H. Trimming of sheep spinal cord by waterjet; an experimental study. Heliyon 9, 2563 (2023).

  34. Cui, D. et al. Experimental study on the effect of water jet cutting parameters on maize stalks. Agriculture 13, 880 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Popan, I. A., Contiu, G. & Campbell, I. In MATEC Web of Conferences. 01009 (EDP Sciences, 2025).

  36. Peneva, M., Gjorgjeska, A., Ginoski, V., Breshkovska, H. & Tolevska, R. D. Electrosurgical microneedle versus scalpel skin incisions in the facial region. Sanamed 13, 269–273 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ravi, R. R. & Srinivasu, D. Jet pressure influence on micro-abrasive waterjet trepanned hole in CFRP composite material. Manuf. Technol. Today. 22, 24–29 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zeng, D., Tang, Z., Wang, W., Wang, Z. & Li, J. Experimental investigation of the optimal driving pressure for a larger-volume controllable jet injection system. Med. Eng. Phys. 119, 104033 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zhongwei, H., Wangyuan, L. & Xipeng, X. Experimental study on the cutting characteristics of three typical biological soft tissues. J. Mech. Eng. 52, 186–192 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, Z. et al. Recent advances in soft biological tissue manipulating technologies. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 35, 89 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wong, S. L. et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma: American society of clinical oncology and society of surgical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 399–413 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Muldrew, K. et al. Cryobiology of articular cartilage: ice morphology and recovery of chondrocytes. Cryobiology 40, 102–109 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Prescher, H. et al. Scalpel edge roughness affects post-transection peripheral nerve regeneration. Surg. Open 4, 1–6 (2021).

  44. Casutt, M. M., Scheeder, M. R., Escher, F., Dufey, P. A. & Kreuzer, M. Relating texture properties and composition of bovine fat tissue. Lipid/Fett 101, 283–290 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sidorov, D. et al. Surgical and pathomorphological results of total mesorectumectomy by using waterjet dissection technique in patients with rectal cancer. Surg. Oncol. 6, 17–22 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52474208), the Chongqing Talents·ProgramExcellent·ScientistProject (No.cstc2024ycjh-bgzxm0016) and Excellent Youth Team Project for the Central Universities (No.2023CDJYXTD-001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China

    Yukun Lan, Wenchuan Liu, Jiren Tang & Shuaikang Chang

  2. State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Methane Drainage in Complex Coal Gas Seam, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China

    Yukun Lan, Wenchuan Liu, Jiren Tang & Shuaikang Chang

  3. Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400044, China

    Hong Li & Guiqiang Hao

Authors
  1. Yukun Lan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenchuan Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiren Tang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hong Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuaikang Chang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Guiqiang Hao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The research was conceptualized by Yukun Lan. The methodology was developed by Yukun Lan and Wenchuan Liu. The investigation was conducted by Yukun Lan. Software development and validation were performed by Yukun Lan, Shuaikang Chang, and Gui Qiang. Data curation was carried out by Yukun Lan and Shuaikang Chang. Resources were provided by Jiren Tang and Hong Li. Funding acquisition was secured by Wenchuan Liu and Jiren Tang. Supervision was overseen by Wenchuan Liu, Jiren Tang, and Hong Li. The original draft of the manuscript was written by Yukun Lan, and all authors (Yukun Lan, Wenchuan Liu, Jiren Tang, Hong Li, Shuaikang Chang, and Gui Qiang) participated in the review and editing process.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenchuan Liu or Jiren Tang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The in vitro experiments were approved by Tianjin Jinke Bona Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Tianjin, China) under scientific license SYXK2023-0005 for scientific experimental research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lan, Y., Liu, W., Tang, J. et al. Investigation on the cutting-infiltration integrated strategy based on medical waterjet for targeted drug delivery. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39721-y

Download citation

  • Received: 18 November 2025

  • Accepted: 06 February 2026

  • Published: 19 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39721-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Medical water jet
  • Drug delivery
  • Anesthesia drug
  • Tissue damage
  • Nonmonotonic diffusion properties
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer