Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
GCIPL color coding on OCT predicts glaucoma conversion in normal-tension glaucoma suspects, including a high myopia subgroup
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 February 2026

GCIPL color coding on OCT predicts glaucoma conversion in normal-tension glaucoma suspects, including a high myopia subgroup

  • Hee Jong Shin1,2,
  • Hae-Young Lopilly Park1,2,3,
  • Hee Kyung Ryu1,2 &
  • …
  • Chan Kee Park1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 61 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Medical research

Abstract

This retrospective study investigated the predictive value of OCT-derived color coding in assessing the risk of glaucoma conversion among normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) suspects, with a particular focus on highly myopic eyes. A total of 307 eyes underwent baseline spectral-domain OCT imaging, with RNFL and GCIPL thicknesses categorized by device-generated color codes (green: normal, yellow: borderline, red: abnormal). Glaucoma conversion was defined by the emergence of reproducible visual field defects over a mean follow-up of 76.0 ± 8.8 months, during which 23.8% of eyes progressed. Inferotemporal GCIPL thickness showed the strongest discriminative capacity (AUC = 0.68, cutoff = 62.0 μm), with further improvement in highly myopic eyes (AUC = 0.85). Red color coding in the inferotemporal sector was associated with a significantly increased risk of conversion (HR 2.473; p = 0.050), while eyes with green coding in both inferotemporal and average GCIPL sectors demonstrated high negative predictive values (85.0% overall, 90.2% in the myopic subgroup). These results highlight the clinical utility of GCIPL color coding on OCT as an accessible and practical tool for identifying early disease stability and stratifying risk of progression, even in anatomically challenging high myopia cases.

Similar content being viewed by others

Optical coherence tomography angiography compared with optical coherence tomography for detection of glaucoma progression with high myopia

Article Open access 21 March 2025

Racial-ethnic disparities in concurrent rates of peripapillary & macular OCT parameters among a large glaucomatous clinical population

Article Open access 04 May 2024

Classifying glaucoma exclusively with OCT: comparison of three clustering algorithms derived from machine learning

Article 19 October 2023

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Weinreb, R. N., Aung, T. & Medeiros, F. A. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. Jama 311(18), 1901–1911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3192 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geevarghese, A., Wollstein, G., Ishikawa, H. & Schuman, J. S. Optical coherence tomography and glaucoma. Annu Rev. Vis. Sci Sep. 15, 7:693–726. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-100419-111350 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dong, Z. M., Wollstein, G. & Schuman, J. S. Clinical utility of optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci Jul. 1 (9), Oct556–567. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19933 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sun, M. T. et al. Glaucoma and Myopia: Diagnostic Challenges. Biomol. Mar. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13030562 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kudsieh, B. et al. Update on the Utility of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Analysis of the Optic Nerve Head in Highly Myopic Eyes with and without Glaucoma. J Clin. Med Mar. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072592 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Y. Q. et al. Exploring optical coherence tomography parameters in eyes with myopic Tilted disc. Eye Vis. (Lond) Nov. 2 (1), 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-024-00411-3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maslin, J. S., Mansouri, K. & Dorairaj, S. K. HRT for the diagnosis and detection of glaucoma progression. Open. Ophthalmol. J. 9, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101509010058 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trick, G. L., Calotti, F. Y. & Skarf, B. Advances in imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer. J Neuroophthalmol Dec. 26 (4), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wno.0000249327.65227.67 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, L. et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of the peripapillary retina in glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol Sep. 133 (9), 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2225 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Moraes, C. G., Liebmann, J. M. & Levin, L. A. Detection and measurement of clinically meaningful visual field progression in clinical trials for glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res Jan. 56, 107–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.10.001 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silverman, A. L. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the spectralis and cirrus reference databases in differentiating between healthy and early glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology Feb. 123 (2), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.047 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quiroz-Reyes, M. A., Quiroz-Gonzalez, E. A., Quiroz-Gonzalez, M. A. & Lima-Gomez, V. Comprehensive assessment of glaucoma in patients with high myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a discussion of structural and functional imaging modalities. Int Ophthalmol Oct. 11 (1), 405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03321-4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jeong, Y., Kim, Y. K., Jeoung, J. W. & Park, K. H. Comparison of optical coherence tomography structural parameters for diagnosis of glaucoma in high myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol Jul. 1 (7), 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.1717 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chang, P. Y., Wang, J. Y. & Wang, J. K. Optical coherence tomography angiography compared with optical coherence tomography for detection of glaucoma progression with high myopia. Sci Rep Mar. 21 (1), 9762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91880-6 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mwanza, J. C., Warren, J. L. & Budenz, D. L. Utility of combining spectral domain optical coherence tomography structural parameters for the diagnosis of early glaucoma: a mini-review. Eye Vis. (Lond). 5, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0101-6 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jiravarnsirikul, A. et al. Evaluating glaucoma in myopic eyes: challenges and opportunities. Surv Ophthalmol May-Jun. 70 (3), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.12.003 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leung, C. K. S., Guo, P. Y. & Lam, A. K. N. Retinal nerve fiber layer optical texture analysis: involvement of the papillomacular bundle and papillofoveal bundle in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology Sep. 129 (9), 1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.04.012 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, X. et al. Predicting development of glaucomatous visual field conversion using baseline Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography. Am J. Ophthalmol Mar. 163, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.11.029 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nakanishi, H. et al. Effect of axial length on macular ganglion cell complex thickness and on early glaucoma diagnosis by Spectral-Domain optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma May. 25 (5), e481–490. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000330 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sawada, A., Manabe, Y., Yamamoto, T. & Nagata, C. Long-term clinical course of normotensive preperimetric glaucoma. Br J. Ophthalmol Dec. 101 (12), 1649–1653. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309401 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Inuzuka, H. et al. Development of glaucomatous visual field defects in preperimetric glaucoma patients within 3 years of diagnosis. J Glaucoma Jun. 25 (6), e591–595. https://doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0000000000000260 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tham, Y. C. et al. Profiles of ganglion Cell-Inner plexiform layer thickness in a Multi-Ethnic Asian population: the Singapore epidemiology of eye diseases study. Ophthalmology Aug. 127 (8), 1064–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.055 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP; No. NRF-2021R1A2C2093617). The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research. Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea

    Hee Jong Shin, Hae-Young Lopilly Park, Hee Kyung Ryu & Chan Kee Park

  2. Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul, South Korea

    Hee Jong Shin, Hae-Young Lopilly Park, Hee Kyung Ryu & Chan Kee Park

  3. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-ku, Seoul, 137-701, South Korea

    Hae-Young Lopilly Park

Authors
  1. Hee Jong Shin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hae-Young Lopilly Park
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hee Kyung Ryu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chan Kee Park
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.J.S. and H-Y.L.P. conceptualized the research and wrote the main manuscript. H.J.S. and H-Y.L.P. curated the dataset and analyzed the data. C.K.P. supervised the research. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hae-Young Lopilly Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, H.J., Park, HY.L., Ryu, H.K. et al. GCIPL color coding on OCT predicts glaucoma conversion in normal-tension glaucoma suspects, including a high myopia subgroup. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39779-8

Download citation

  • Received: 24 November 2025

  • Accepted: 07 February 2026

  • Published: 22 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39779-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Normal tension glaucoma
  • Ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL)
  • Color code classification
  • Glaucoma progression
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing