Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Psychosocial impacts of a mouse plague and ongoing psychological stress
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 11 February 2026

Psychosocial impacts of a mouse plague and ongoing psychological stress

  • Aditi Mankad  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-46341,
  • Kerry Collins1,
  • Walter Okello2,
  • Lucy Carter1 &
  • …
  • Peter R. Brown3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 468 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Natural hazards
  • Psychology

Abstract

In 2020-21, parts of eastern Australia experienced a severe mouse plague, estimated to have caused up to AUD$1 billion worth of damage. Yet, the mental health impacts of such a pest plague are not empirically known. The present study sought to quantify and model the psychosocial impacts of the 2021 mouse plague and measure ongoing psychological stress two years post-plague, to provide insights into social impacts and mental wellbeing during a significant biosecurity incursion. An online survey (N = 1,691) measured key psychosocial impact metrics included psychological traits, emotional states (depression, disgust, embarrassment), perceptions of social impacts (response costs, attitudes), support (social, government), and perceived threat of future plague. A partially mediated path model accounted for 74% of variability observed in perceived severity of impacts and ongoing psychological stress. Severity of impacts was predominantly influenced by perceived response costs, negative mood states (i.e. depression) and disgust elicited by the odour of mice. The most influential direct predictors of ongoing psychological stress were depressive symptoms at the time of the plague, and concerns that a future mouse plague would be dangerous or catastrophic to oneself. This study provides empirical insights into both acute social impacts during a significant pest incursion, as well as ongoing psychological stress. Social impacts are rarely measured or modelled; yet these factors are critically important in understanding the effect of severe pest incursions on communities whose livelihoods often depend on the agricultural sector.

Similar content being viewed by others

Classification of social behavioral responses in stress and non-stress adult male mice with high precision

Article Open access 03 December 2025

Structure and function differences in the prelimbic cortex to basolateral amygdala circuit mediate trait vulnerability in a novel model of acute social defeat stress in male mice

Article 19 November 2021

Effects of temporary access to environmental enrichment on measures of laboratory mouse welfare

Article Open access 02 July 2024

Data availability

The dataset generated and analysed within the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

5. References

  1. Singleton, G. R. et al. One hundred years of eruptions of house mice in Australia - A natural biological curio. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00458.x (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, P. R. & Singleton, G. R. Rate of increase as a function of rainfall for house mouse Mus domesticus populations in a cereal-growing region in Southern Australia. J. Appl. Ecol. 36 (4). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1999.00422.x (1999).

  3. Mutze, G. J., Veitch, L. G. & Miller, R. B. Mouse plagues in South Australian cereal-growing areas. II. an empirical model for prediction of plagues. Wildl. Res. 17 (3). https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9900313 (1990).

  4. Pople, A., Scanlan, J., Cremasco, P. & Farrell, J. Population dynamics of house mice in Queensland grain-growing areas. Wildl. Res. 40 (8). https://doi.org/10.1071/WR13154 (2013).

  5. Saunders, G. R. & Giles, J. R. A relationship between plagues of the house mouse, Mus Musculus (rodentia: muridae) and prolonged periods of dry weather in south-eastern Australia. Wildl. Res. 4 (3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR9770241 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology. Special Climate Statement 70 update—drought conditions in Australia and impact on water resources in the Murray–Darling Basin, Canberra, http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/statements/scs70.pdf (2024).

  7. White, J. et al. The new South Wales mouse plague 2020–2021: A one health description. One Health. 18, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ONEHLT.2024.100753 (2024).

  8. Caughley, J., Monamy, V. & Heiden, K. Impact of the 1993 mouse plague, Canberra, ACT, (1994).

  9. Buckle, A. P. & Pelz, H. J. Rodent control in practice: Temperate field crops and forestry, In Rodent Pests and Their Control: 2nd Edition, https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845938178.0247 (2015).

  10. Henry, S., Brown, P. R., Van de Weyer, N., Robinson, F. & Hinds, L. A. Effects of background food on alternative grain uptake and zinc phosphide efficacy in wild house mice. Pest Manag. Sci. 78 (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6720 (2022).

  11. Buckle, A. P. Damage assessment and damage surveys, In Rodent pests and their control, 2nd ed., A. P. Buckle and R. H. Smith, Eds., UK: CAB International, ch. 10, pp. 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845938178.0000 (2015).

  12. Brown, P. R. & Henry, S. Impacts of House Mice on Sustainable Fodder Storage in Australia, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020254 (2022).

  13. NSW Farmers Association. Urgent action required as mouse plague spreads, Media Release. https://www.nswfarmers.org.au/NSWFA/NSWFA/Posts/Media_Releases/mr.39.21.aspx (2024).

  14. Singleton, G. R. & Redhead, T. D. ‘House mouse plagues’, in Mediterranean Landscapes in Australia: Mallee Ecosystems and their Management, (eds Noble, J. C. & Bradstock, R. A.) East Melbourne: CSIRO Australia, 418–433. (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. NSW Health. Communicable Diseases Weekly Report. Week 8, 21 February to 27 February 2021, NSW Government, https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/Reports/Pages/cdwr.aspx (2021).

  16. Henry, S. No one ever forgets living through a mouse plague’: the dystopia facing Australian rural communities, explained by an expert, The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/no-one-ever-forgets-living-through-a-mouse-plague-the-dystopia-facing-australian-rural-communities-explained-by-an-expert-159339 (2021).

  17. Hodgins, G. Coping with the psychological impact of mice plagues, CSU News. https://news.csu.edu.au/latest-news/coping-with-the-psychological-impact-of-mice-plagues (2024).

  18. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Stress and trauma, Web article. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mental-health/stress-and-trauma#trauma (2024).

  19. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. TIP 57: Trauma-Informed Care in Behavioral Health Services, Rockville, MD, 2014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207201/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK207201.pdf (2024).

  20. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edn (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

  21. Yahoo News Staff. How the mice plague almost cost a farmer his life. 03/06/2021, Yahoo! News, Yahoo News Australia, https://au.news.yahoo.com/how-mice-plague-almost-cost-farmer-his-life-050414651.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29 (2021).

  22. Thackray, L. Regional families in New South Wales struggle as mouse plague drags on with no end in sight. 04/08/2021, 7:30 Report ABC News, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-04/mouse-plague-causing-distress-for-regional-families-nsw/100350518 (2021).

  23. Shams, H. Mouse plague impacting NSW residents’ mental health like that of natural disasters, expert says. 26/04/2021, ABC Radio Sydney, ABC News, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-04-26/mouse-plague-impacting-nsw-residents-mental-health/100091634 (2021).

  24. Horn, E. 2021 mouse plague through NSW promotes problems for mental health, says psychologist Professor Gene Hodgins. 12/04/2021, farmonline National, https://www.farmonline.com.au/story/7202816/mouse-plague-wreaks-havoc-on-health/ (2021).

  25. Zhang, Y. et al. The long-term impact of bushfires on the mental health of Australians: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur. J. Psychotraumatol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2022.2087980 (2022).

  26. Bryant, R. A. et al. May., Psychological outcomes following the Victorian Black Saturday bushfires, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 634–643 https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867414534476, (2014).

  27. Puechlong, C., Weiss, K., Le Vigouroux, S. & Charbonnier, E. Role of personality traits and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder among flood victims. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 50, 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJDRR.2020.101688 (2020).

  28. Gunn, K. M. et al. Why are some drought-affected farmers less distressed than others? The association between stress, psychological distress, acceptance, behavioural disengagement and neuroticism, Aust. J. Rural Health, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 106–116, https://doi.org/10.1111/AJR.12695 (2021).

  29. Van Duinen, R., Filatova, T., Geurts, P. & Van Der Veen, A. Empirical Analysis of Farmers Drought Risk Perception: Objective Factors, Personal Circumstances, and Social Influence, Soc. Risk Anal., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 741–755, https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12299 (2014).

  30. Hooper, J., Magor-Blatch, L. & Bhullar, N. Life after bushfire: Post-traumatic stress, coping and post-traumatic growth. Australasian J. Paramed.. 15 (3). https://doi.org/10.33151/AJP.15.3.531 (2018).

  31. Hoffmann, R. & Muttarak, R. Learn from the Past, Prepare for the Future: Impacts of Education and Experience on Disaster Preparedness in the Philippines and Thailand, World Dev., vol. 96, pp. 32–51, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2017.02.016 (2017).

  32. Austin, E. K. et al. Aug., Drought-related stress among farmers: findings from the Australian Rural Mental Health Study, Med. J. Aust., vol. 209, no. 4, pp. 159–165, https://doi.org/10.5694/MJA17.01200 (2018).

  33. Rose Markus, H. & Kitayama, S. Psychological Review Culture and the Self. Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 224–253, (1991).

  34. Lee, D. W. & The Effects of Social Support on Disaster Resilience. Focusing on disaster victims. Int. J. Public. Adm. 47 (2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2093365 (2024).

  35. Park, S., Kim, S., Kim, G. U. & Noh, D. Effects of social support on mental health outcomes in disasters: A cross-sectional study, Nurs. Health Sci., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 456–465,https://doi.org/10.1111/NHS.12830 (2021).

  36. McGuire, A. P. et al. Social support moderates effects of natural disaster exposure on depression and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: effects for displaced and nondisplaced residents. J. Trauma. Stress. 31 (2), 223. https://doi.org/10.1002/JTS.22270 (2018).

  37. Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., Ko, D. & Taylor, S. E. Pursuit of comfort and pursuit of harmony: culture, relationships, and social support seeking, Pers Soc. Psychol. Bull., vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1595–1607, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206291991 (2006).

  38. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2021 Census All persons QuickStats: Far West and Orana, Census data. https://www.abs.gov.au/census/find-census-data/quickstats/2021/105 (2024).

  39. Online Research Unit. About the ORU. https://www.theoru.com/about.htm (2024).

  40. Carter, L., Collins, K., Mankad, A., Okello, W. & Brown, P. R. The human and social impacts of an Australian mouse plague, Wildlife Res., vol. 52, no. 8, https://doi.org/10.1071/WR25016 (2025).

  41. Allen, M. S., Iliescu, D. & Greiff, S. Single Item Measures in Psychological Science: A Call to Action,https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000699 (2022).

  42. Matthews, R. A., Pineault, L. & Hong, Y. H. Normalizing the use of Single-Item measures: validation of the Single-Item compendium for organizational psychology. J. Bus. Psychol. 37 (4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09813-3 (2022).

  43. Benet-Martínez, V. & John, O. P. Los Cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and english. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75 (3). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729 (1998).

  44. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. & Kentle, R. L. The Big Five Inventory - Versions 4a and 54, 1991, University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research, Berkeley, CA.

  45. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P. & Soto, C. J. Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues, In Handbook Personality. Theory Res., (2008).

  46. Cella, D. et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63 (11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 (2010).

  47. Pilkonis, P. A. et al. Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®): Depression, anxiety, and anger, Assessment, vol. 18, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411667 (2011).

  48. Teresi, J. A., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Kleinman, M., Ramirez, M. & Kim, G. Psychometric Properties and Performance of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Depression Short Forms in Ethnically Diverse Groups. Psychol Test. Assess. Model, 58, 1, (2016).

  49. Ajzen, I. Sep., The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995, (2011).

  50. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T (1991).

  51. Najafi, M., Khankeh, H. R., Elmi, H. & Pourvakhshoori, N. Behavioral, normative and control beliefs about earthquake preparedness: A deductive content analysis study. PLoS Curr. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.20fbad29d53fb164ac2699dc2736d804 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tan, K. L., Sia, J. K. M. & Tang, K. H. D. Examining students’ behavior towards campus security preparedness exercise: the role of perceived risk within the theory of planned behavior. Curr. Psychol. 41 (7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00951-6 (2022).

  53. Daellenbach, K., Parkinson, J. & Krisjanous, J. Just how prepared are you? An application of marketing segmentation and theory of planned behavior for disaster Preparation. J. Nonprofit Public. Sect. Mark. 30 (4). https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1452830 (2018).

  54. Kocalevent, R. D. et al. Jul., Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3), BMC Psychol, 6, 1, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1186/S40359-018-0249-9/TABLES/7 (2018).

  55. Mankad, A. & Curnock, M. Emergence of social groups after a biosecurity incursion, Agron. Sustain. Dev., vol. 38, no. 4, p. 40,https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0520-8 (2018).

  56. Smith, E. & Burkle, F. M. Collective trauma is real, and could hamper Australian communities’ bushfire recovery, Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://aifs.gov.au/resources/short-articles/collective-trauma-real-and-could-hamper-australian-communities-bushfire (2020).

  57. Weiss, D. S. The Impact of Event Scale: Revised, In Cross-Cultural Assessment of Psychological Trauma and PTSD, New York: Springer, ch. 10, pp. 219–238.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70990-1_10 (2007).

  58. Weiss, D. & Marmar, C. ‘The impact of event Scale - Revised’, in Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD, (eds Wilson, J. & Keane, T.) New York: Guildford, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Beck, J. G. et al. The impact of event Scale-Revised: psychometric properties in a sample of motor vehicle accident survivors. J. Anxiety Disord.. 22 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.02.007 (2008).

  60. Sterling, M. & ‘The Impact of Event Scale (IES). Commentary’. Australian Physiotherapy Assoc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-9514(08)70074-6 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Morina, N., Ehring, T. & Priebe, S. Diagnostic utility of the impact of event scale-revised in two samples of survivors of war. PLoS One. 8 (12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083916 (2013).

  62. Asukai, N. et al. Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the impact of event Scale-Revised (IES-R-J): four studies of different traumatic events. J. Nerv. Mental Disease. 190 (3). https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-200203000-00006 (2002).

  63. Creamer, M., Bell, R. & Failla, S. Psychometric properties of the impact of event Scale - Revised. Behav. Res. Ther. 41 (12), 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kawamura, N., Kim, Y. & Asukai, N. Suppression of cellular immunity in men with a past history of posttraumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry. 158 (3). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.484 (2001).

  65. StataCorp Stata Statistical Software: Release 17, StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX (2021).

  66. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988).

  67. David & Freedman Robert. Pisani, and Roger. Purves, Statistics 3rd edn (W.W. Norton, 1998).

  68. Ioannidis, J. P. A. What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values?, Am Stat, vol. 73, no. sup1, pp. 20–25, Mar. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1447512 (2019).

  69. Palesch, Y. Y. Some common misperceptions about p-values, Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation, vol. 45, no. 12, p. e244, https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006138. (2014).

  70. American Psychological Association. DSM-5-TR Level 2 - Depression - Adult (PROMIS Depression Short Form), APA. (2013).

  71. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Mental health: 2017-18 financial year. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/mental-health/mental-health/2017-18 (2024).

  72. Widiger, T. A. & Oltmanns, J. R. Neuroticism is a fundamental domain of personality with enormous public health implications, https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20411 (2017).

  73. American Psychiatric Association. LEVEL 2—Depression—Adult (PROMIS Emotional Distress—Depression— Short Form), http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Feedback-Form.aspx (2013).

  74. Bentler, P. M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychol Bull, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 238–246, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 (1990).

  75. Byrne, B. M. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-14005-000 (2001).

  76. Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S. & Rogers, R. W. A Meta-Analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30 (2), 407–429 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ogle, C. M., Siegler, I. C., Beckham, J. C. & Rubin, D. C. Neuroticism increases PTSD symptom severity by amplifying the Emotionality, Rehearsal, and centrality of trauma memories. J. Pers. 85 (5), 702. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOPY.12278 (2017).

  78. Gorka, S. M., Lieberman, L., Shankman, S. A. & Phan, K. L. Startle potentiation to uncertain threat as a Psychophysiological indicator of fear-based psychopathology: an examination across multiple internalizing disorders. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126 (1). https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000233 (2017).

  79. Lieberman, L. et al. The relation between posttraumatic stress symptom severity and startle potentiation to predictable and unpredictable threat. J. Nerv. Mental Dis.. 208 (5). https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001138 (2020).

  80. Norrholm, S. D. & Jovanovic, T. Fear Processing, Psychophysiology, and PTSD, https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000189 (2018).

  81. Forbes, D. et al. The role of anger and ongoing stressors in mental health following a natural disaster. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatr.. 49 (8). https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867414565478 (2015).

  82. López-Castro, T., Saraiya, T., Zumberg-Smith, K. & Dambreville, N. Association between shame and posttraumatic stress disorder: A Meta-Analysis. J. Trauma. Stress. 32 (4). https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22411 (2019).

  83. Gunn, K. M., Kettler, L. J., a Skaczkowski, G. L. & Turnbull, D. Farmers’ stress and coping in a time of drought, Rural Remote Health, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–16, (2012).

  84. NSW Ministry of Health. Staying healthy during a mouse plague Health risks associated with rodents, https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/environment/factsheets/Factsheets/mouse-plague.pdf (2021).

  85. Australian Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry. Dealing with mice - your physical and mental health. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/pests-diseases-weeds/mouse-infestation/mental-health (2024).

  86. Government, N. S. W.‘Rural Adversity Mental Health Program. https://www.ramhp.com.au/ (2024).

  87. Byers, K. A., Cox, S. M., Lam, R. & Himsworth, C. G. They’re always there: resident experiences of living with rats in a disadvantaged urban neighbourhood. BMC Public. Health. 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7202-6 (2019).

  88. Chelule, P. K. & Mbentse, A. Rat infestation in Gauteng province: lived experiences of Kathlehong Township residents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 18 (21). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111280 (2021).

  89. Shang, F., Cowlishaw, S., Kaniasty, K., Ma, H. & Forbes, D. Disaster survivors’ perceptions of received social support: Outcome, delivery, and provider all matter. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102761 (2022).

  90. Kaniasty, K. Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.026 (2020).

  91. National Disaster Mental Health and National Mental Health Commission & Framework, W. Sep. https://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov.au/projects/national-disaster-response/disaster-framework (2023).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the participants of this study who gave their time and mental effort in reliving the mouse plague event for our research.

Funding

Open access funding provided by CSIRO Library Services. This research was funded by the NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Environment, GPO Box 2583, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia

    Aditi Mankad, Kerry Collins & Lucy Carter

  2. CSIRO Environment, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia

    Walter Okello

  3. CSIRO Health & Biosecurity, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia

    Peter R. Brown

Authors
  1. Aditi Mankad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kerry Collins
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Walter Okello
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lucy Carter
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter R. Brown
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AM: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resource Visualization; Supervision; Validation; Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing. KC/WO: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Resource Visualization; Validation; Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing. LC: Conceptualization; Investigation; Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing. PB : Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Project administration; Writing - original draft; Writing - review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditi Mankad.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This research complies with the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2023 and the Australian Privacy Act 1988. Approval was received by the CSIRO Social and Interdisciplinary Science Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 179/22).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mankad, A., Collins, K., Okello, W. et al. Psychosocial impacts of a mouse plague and ongoing psychological stress. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39861-1

Download citation

  • Received: 26 September 2024

  • Accepted: 09 February 2026

  • Published: 11 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39861-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Biosecurity
  • Pest incursion
  • Public attitudes
  • Australia
  • Social science
  • Farming
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing