Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Comparative evaluation of MRI-based bone-targeted sequences and computed tomography for preoperative assessment of midfacial trauma
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 February 2026

Comparative evaluation of MRI-based bone-targeted sequences and computed tomography for preoperative assessment of midfacial trauma

  • Adib Al-Haj Husain1,2,
  • Peter Kessler2,
  • Suen An Nynke Lie2,
  • Sameena Sandhu1,
  • Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner1,
  • Egon Burian3,
  • Daniel Zedler3,
  • Marc M. Precht1,
  • Stefan Sommer4,5,
  • Thomas Frauenfelder3 &
  • …
  • Harald Essig1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 362 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Anatomy
  • Diseases
  • Health care
  • Medical research

Abstract

This prospective study aimed to compare computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative assessment of acute midfacial trauma. Twenty patients received posttraumatic CT and MRI scans using a 3T scanner with a dedicated 15-channel dentomaxillofacial coil. Five MRI protocols were evaluated: UTE, DESS, Dark Bone, StarVIBE, and STIR. Three observers qualitatively assessed fracture detection, image quality, fracture line visibility, cortical delineation, and bone-to-soft-tissue contrast using a five-point scale. Descriptive statistics and inter-observer reliability (Krippendorff’s α) were calculated. Forty-two fractures were analyzed. CT achieved excellent fracture detection (98% of fractures detected; α = 1.0) with the fastest evaluation times (30–82 s vs. 42–145 s). Among MRI protocols, UTE and StarVIBE performed best, detecting 88–89% of fractures, with excellent image quality and high inter-observer reliability (α = 0.80–0.91). Darkbone, DESS, and STIR consistently showed lower detection rates (up to 43%). UTE and StarVIBE were particularly effective for orbital, zygomaticomaxillary, and nasal bone fractures. Optimized gradient-echo-based MRI protocols provide radiation-free, CT-like imaging of midfacial fractures with superior soft-tissue contrast. While CT remains essential for emergency situations, a patient-, protocol-, and pathology-specific MR-based diagnostic approach offers a clinically feasible preoperative alternative in trauma management.

Trial registration number: Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal: SNCTP000006343, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07012850 (trial registration date: May 9, 2025).

Similar content being viewed by others

MR-orthopantomography in operative dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery: a proof of concept study

Article Open access 17 April 2023

Temporal subtraction CT with nonrigid image registration improves detection of bone metastases by radiologists: results of a large-scale observer study

Article Open access 16 September 2021

Objective analysis of facial bone fracture CT images using curvature measurement in a surface mesh model

Article Open access 02 February 2023

Data availability

The datasets analyzed in this clinical trial are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Zaleckas, L., Pečiulienė, V., Gendvilienė, I., Pūrienė, A. & Rimkuvienė, J. Prevalence and etiology of midfacial fractures: A study of 799 cases. Medicina (Kaunas) 51(4), 222–227 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Delgado-Piedra, D., Castillo Ham, G., Téliz, M. A., Salgado-Chavarría, F. & García-Vázquez, P. Patterns of midface and mandible fractures in a government hospital. Craniomaxillofac. Trauma Reconstr. 17(3), 194–202 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gassner, R., Tuli, T., Hächl, O., Rudisch, A. & Ulmer, H. Cranio-maxillofacial trauma: A 10 year review of 9,543 cases with 21,067 injuries. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 31(1), 51–61 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wikner, J., Riecke, B., Gröbe, A., Heiland, M. & Hanken, H. Imaging of the midfacial and orbital trauma. Facial Plast. Surg. 30(5), 528–536 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fabrega, M. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 35(3), 297–309 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Carvalho, M. F. et al. Validity of computed tomography in diagnosing midfacial fractures. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 50(4), 471–476 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Din, R. U. & Yang, H. Emerging MRI-based spine scoring techniques targeting bone quality to assess osteoporosis, vertebral fracture risk, other spinal degenerative diseases, and post-surgical outcomes. Radiol. Med. 130(9), 1442–1459 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ud Din, R. & Yang, H. Editorial for “Comparing CT-like images based on ultra-short echo time and gradient echo T1-weighted MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral disorders using histology and true CT as the reference standard”. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 59(5), 1553–1554 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in dental, oral and maxillofacial trauma: A systematic review. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.05.016 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Black bone and CT-like MRI-based delineation of fracture-prone regions in oral and maxillofacial trauma. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 29(1), 136 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greiser, A. et al. Dental-dedicated MRI, a novel approach for dentomaxillofacial diagnostic imaging: Technical specifications and feasibility. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 53(1), 74–85 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ritschl, L. M. et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging black bone sequence for mandibular fracture diagnosis and dislocation measurement. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2025.02.028 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feuerriegel, G. C. et al. Imaging of traumatic mandibular fractures in young adults using CT-like MRI: A feasibility study. Clin. Oral Investig. 27(3), 1227–1233 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burian, E. et al. High resolution MRI for quantitative assessment of inferior alveolar nerve impairment in course of mandible fractures: An imaging feasibility study. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 11566 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in mandibular trauma assessment - A prospective comparative study. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 30(1), 12 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burian, E. et al. MRI of the inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve-anatomical variation and morphometric benchmark values of nerve diameters in healthy subjects. Clin. Oral Investig. 24(8), 2625–2634 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hayes, A. F. & Krippendorff, K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun. Methods Meas. 1(1), 77–89 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Langner, S. Optimized imaging of the midface and orbits. GMS Curr. Top. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 14, Doc05 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, W. Y. et al. Paediatric head CT scan and subsequent risk of malignancy and benign brain tumour: A nation-wide population-based cohort study. Br. J. Cancer 110(9), 2354–2360 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sodickson, A. et al. Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 251(1), 175–184 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Widmann, G. et al. As low as diagnostically acceptable dose imaging in maxillofacial trauma: a reference quality approach. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 52(3), 20220387 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oenning, A. C., Jacobs, R. & Salmon. B. (http://www.dimitra.be) DRG. ALADAIP, beyond ALARA and towards personalized optimization for paediatric cone-beam CT. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 31(5), 676–678 (2021).

  23. Vyas, K. S., Suchyta, M. A., Hunt, C. H., Gibreel, W. & Mardini, S. Black bone MRI for virtual surgical planning in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Semin. Plast. Surg. 36(3), 192–198 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Preoperative imaging in third molar surgery - A prospective comparison of X-ray-based and radiation-free magnetic resonance orthopantomography. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 52(1), 117–126 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Valeggia, S. et al. Black bone MRI vs. CT in temporal bone assessment in craniosynostosis: A radiation-free alternative. Neuroradiology 67(1), 257–267 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Eley, K. A., Watt-Smith, S. R., Sheerin, F. & Golding, S. J. Black bone" MRI: A potential alternative to CT with three-dimensional reconstruction of the craniofacial skeleton in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis. Eur. Radiol. 24(10), 2417–2426 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Dental MRI of oral soft-tissue tumors-optimized use of black bone MRI sequences and a 15-channel mandibular coil. J. Imaging https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8050146 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in dental implant surgery: A systematic review. Int. J. Implant Dent. 10(1), 14 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Visualization of the inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve using MRI in oral and maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091657 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fox, L. A. et al. Diagnostic performance of CT, MPR and 3DCT imaging in maxillofacial trauma. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 19(5), 385–395 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reichel, K. et al. Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of fast whole-body MRI in slightly to moderately injured trauma patients. Eur. Radiol. 35(1), 487–495 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Du, J. & Bydder, G. M. Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort-TE MRI of cortical bone. NMR Biomed. 26(5), 489–506 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eley, K. A., McIntyre, A. G., Watt-Smith, S. R. & Golding, S. J. “Black bone” MRI: A partial flip angle technique for radiation reduction in craniofacial imaging. Br. J. Radiol. 85(1011), 272–278 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tsuchiya, K., Gomyo, M., Katase, S., Hiraoka, S. & Tateishi, H. Magnetic resonance bone imaging: Applications to vertebral lesions. Jpn. J. Radiol. 41(11), 1173–1185 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rai, P., Janu, A. K., Shetty, N. & Kulkarni, S. Current landscape of short-T2 imaging techniques in the musculoskeletal system: The past, present and future. J. Magn. Reson Imaging (2025).

  36. Bae, W. C. et al. Quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI of human cortical bone: Correlation with porosity and biomechanical properties. J. Bone Miner. Res. 27(4), 848–857 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qu, J. et al. Free-breathing StarVIBE sequence for the detection of extranodal extension in head and neck cancer: An image quality and diagnostic performance study. Cancers (Basel) https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15204992 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. Preoperative visualization of the lingual nerve by 3D double-echo steady-state MRI in surgical third molar extraction treatment. Clin. Oral Investig. 26(2), 2043–2053 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Al-Haj Husain, A. et al. MR-orthopantomography in operative dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery: A proof of concept study. Sci. Rep. 13(1), 6228 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Eley, K. A. & Delso, G. Imaging of bone in the head and neck region, is there more than CT?. Curr. Radiol. Rep. 10(6), 69–82 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Chen, C. A. et al. Cartilage morphology at 3.0T: Assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 32(1), 173–183 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tall, M. A., Thompson, A. K., Greer, B. & Campbell, S. The pearls and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging of the lower extremity. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 41(11), 873–886 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dabas, M. M. et al. Comparative efficacy of MRI and CT in traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Cureus 16(10), e72086 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the support of the Swiss Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (SADMFR). We extend special thanks to Yesenia Gassner and Tara-Cheyenne Senn, radiographers at the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, for their help in acquiring imaging data.

Funding

This research project received financial support from a competitive grant provided by the Research Fund of the Swiss Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (SADMFR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland

    Adib Al-Haj Husain, Sameena Sandhu, Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner, Marc M. Precht & Harald Essig

  2. Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Adib Al-Haj Husain, Peter Kessler & Suen An Nynke Lie

  3. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Egon Burian, Daniel Zedler & Thomas Frauenfelder

  4. Swiss Center for Musculoskeletal Imaging (SCMI), Balgrist Campus, Zurich, Switzerland

    Stefan Sommer

  5. Swiss Innovation Hub, Siemens Healthineers International AG, Zurich, Switzerland

    Stefan Sommer

Authors
  1. Adib Al-Haj Husain
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Kessler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suen An Nynke Lie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sameena Sandhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maximilian Eberhard Hermann Wagner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Egon Burian
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel Zedler
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Marc M. Precht
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Stefan Sommer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Thomas Frauenfelder
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Harald Essig
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, design, execution, data curation, investigation,or analysis: A.A.H., P.K., S.A.N.L., S.S., M.E.H.W., E.B., D.Z., M.M.P., S.S., T.F., and H.E.; drafting manuscript, A.A.H.; writing review and editing, P.K., S.A.N.L., S.S., M.E.H.W., E.B., D.Z., M.M.P., S.S., T.F., and H.E.. All authors have read and approved this version of the manuscript and take responsibility for all its aspects.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adib Al-Haj Husain.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was granted by the Cantonal Ethics Commission (Zurich, Switzerland, 2024-02307).

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study, allowing publication of images in all figures. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments concerning medical research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Haj Husain, A., Kessler, P., Lie, S.A.N. et al. Comparative evaluation of MRI-based bone-targeted sequences and computed tomography for preoperative assessment of midfacial trauma. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40252-9

Download citation

  • Received: 18 November 2025

  • Accepted: 11 February 2026

  • Published: 18 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40252-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Computed tomography
  • Midfacial fractures
  • Trauma
  • Maxillofacial surgery
  • CT-like MRI
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing