Abstract
Oil palm production is expanding in traditional farming and forested areas, especially in West and Central Africa around the Congo Forest Basin and mostly characterized by declining yields and yield gaps. Due to typically non-binding land access, independent producers tend to prioritize extensification over intensification, which has negative environmental consequences. Sustainable intensification (SI) of smallholder production is a guiding paradigm that aims to increase yields while minimizing negative environmental impacts. In this study, we examine the relationship between producer organizations (POs), sustainable intensification practices (SIPs), namely mulching and intercropping, and oil palm yields in Cameroon. We estimate actual and counterfactual associations between POs, SIPs, production, and yields, drawing on farm- and household-level data collected through surveys and interviews with village chiefs and reference farmers. Empirically, we employ various regression techniques, including ordinary least squares, doubly robust estimators, instrumental variable estimators, recursive bivariate probit models, and switching regressions. Our findings reveal a positive association between POs and oil palm production and yields. The actual-counterfactual analysis demonstrates that POs not only benefit their members in terms of yield gains but also have the potential to benefit non-members if they were to join POs. Furthermore, POs are positively associated with the adoption of mulching and intercropping. Our results show distinct insights by gender when households are analyzed separately. We also find complementary evidence that PO membership is significantly associated with behavioral factors such as perceived self-efficacy, locus of control, hope and risk preference, suggesting that POs are a platform that shape behavioral conditions relevant for sustainable intensification and productivity. Overall, our study highlights the potential of POs as entry points for facilitating the adoption of SIPs and stimulating productivity increases in smallholder oil palm systems.
Data availability
Data and codes used for the analysis would be shared by the corresponding author upon request.
References
Qaim, M., Sibhatu, K. T., Siregar, H. & Grass, I. Environmental, economic, and social consequences of the oil palm boom. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12, 321–344 (2020).
Sibhatu, K. T. Oil palm boom: Its socioeconomic use and abuse. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 7, 1083022 (2023).
Krishna, V. V. & Kubitza, C. Impact of oil palm expansion on the provision of private and community goods in rural Indonesia. Ecol. Econ. 179, 106829 (2021).
Santika, T. et al. Does oil palm agriculture help alleviate poverty? A multidimensional counterfactual assessment of oil palm development in Indonesia. World Dev. 120, 105–117 (2019).
Monzon, J. et al. Fostering a climate-smart intensification for oil palm. Nat. Sustain. 4 (7), 595–601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00700-y (2021).
Sibhatu, K. T., Tabe‐Ojong, M. P. J. & Siregar, H. Nature-based land management practices and yield dynamics in oil palm production: Insights from Indonesian smallholder growers. Agric. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70018 (2025).
Euler, M., Hoffmann, M. P., Fathoni, Z. & Schwarze, S. Exploring yield gaps in smallholder oil palm production systems in eastern Sumatra, Indonesia. Agric. Syst. 146, 111–119 (2016).
Krishna, V., Euler, M., Siregar, H. & Qaim, M. Differential livelihood impacts of oil palm expansion in Indonesia. Agric. Econ. 48, 639–653 (2017).
Rhebergen, T., Fairhurst, T., Whitbread, A., Giller, K. E. & Zingore, S. Yield gap analysis and entry points for improving productivity on large oil palm plantations and smallholder farms in Ghana. Agric. Syst. 165, 14–25 (2018).
Rhebergen, T. et al. Closing yield gaps in oil palm production systems in Ghana through Best Management Practices. Eur. J. Agron. 115, 126011 (2020).
Woittiez, L. S., Van Wijk, M. T., Slingerland, M., Van Noordwijk, M. & Giller, K. E. Yield gaps in oil palm: A quantitative review of contributing factors. Eur. J. Agron. 83, 57–77 (2017).
Manorama, K. et al. Mulching and technological interventions avoid land degradation in an intensive oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) production system. Land Degrad. Dev. 32, 3785–3797 (2021).
Rudolf, K., Hennings, N., Dippold, M. A., Edison, E. & Wollni, M. Improving economic and environmental outcomes in oil palm smallholdings: The relationship between mulching, soil properties and yields. Agric. Syst. 193, 103242 (2021).
Ahirwal, J., Sahoo, U. K., Thangjam, U. & Thong, P. Oil palm agroforestry enhances crop yield and ecosystem carbon stock in northeast India: Implications for the United Nations sustainable development goals. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 30, 478–487 (2022).
Nchanji, Y. K., Nkongho, R. N., Mala, W. A. & Levang, P. Efficacy of oil palm intercropping by smallholders. Case study in South-West Cameroon. Agroforest. Syst. 90, 509–519 (2016).
Ordway, E. M., Naylor, R. L., Nkongho, R. N. & Lambin, E. F. Oil palm expansion and deforestation in Southwest Cameroon associated with proliferation of informal mills. Nat. Commun. 10, 114 (2019).
Tabe-Ojong, P. J. M., Ordway, E. M., Nkongho, R. N. & Molua, E. L. Oil palm expansion among non-industrial producers in Cameroon: Potentials for synergy between agro-economic gains and ecological safeguards. For. Policy Econ. 135, 102645 (2022).
Bernard, T. & Spielman, D. J. Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia. Food Policy 34, 60–69 (2009).
Minah, M. What is the influence of government programs on farmer organizations and their impacts? Evidence from Zambia. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 93, 29–53 (2022).
Mwambi, M., Bijman, J. & Mshenga, P. Which type of producer organization is (more) inclusive? Dynamics of farmers’ membership and participation in the decision-making process. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 91, 213–236 (2020).
Tabe-Ojong, P. J. M., Alamsyah, Z. & Sibhatu, K. T. Oil palm expansion, food security and diets: Comparative evidence from Cameroon and Indonesia. J. Clean. Prod. 418, 138085 (2023).
Markelova, H., Meinzen-Dick, R., Hellin, J. & Dohrn, S. Collective action for smallholder market access. Food Policy 34, 1–7 (2009).
Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J. & Van Bavel, R. Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 46, 417–471 (2019).
Tabe-Ojong, M. P. J., Kedinga, M. E. & Gebrekidan, B. H. Behavioural factors matter for the adoption of climate-smart agriculture. Sci. Rep. 14, 798 (2024).
Ruml, A. & Qaim, M. Effects of marketing contracts and resource-providing contracts in the African small farm sector: Insights from oil palm production in Ghana. World Dev. 136, 105110 (2020).
Geffersa, A. G. Does cooperative membership enhance inorganic fertilizer use intensity? Panel data evidence from maize farmers in Ethiopia. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 95, 327–361 (2024).
Ma, W., Zheng, H. & Yuan, P. Impacts of cooperative membership on banana yield and risk exposure: Insights from China. J. Agric. Econ. 73, 564–579 (2022).
Wossen, T. et al. Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare. J. Rural Stud. 54, 223–233 (2017).
Ayompe, L. M., Nkongho, R. N., Masso, C. & Egoh, B. N. Does investment in palm oil trade alleviate smallholders from poverty in Africa? Investigating profitability from a biodiversity hotspot, Cameroon. PLoS ONE 16, e0256498 (2021).
Ordway, E. M., Naylor, R. L., Nkongho, R. N. & Lambin, E. F. Oil palm expansion in Cameroon: Insights into sustainability opportunities and challenges in Africa. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 190–200 (2017).
Alemagi, D. et al. Pathways for sustainable intensification and diversification of cocoa agroforestry landscapes in Cameroon. In Climate-smart landscapes: multifunctionality in practice 347–359 (World Agroforestry Centre, 2015).
Tabe-Ojong, P. J. M. et al. Oil palm production, income gains, and off-farm employment among independent producers in Cameroon. Ecol. Econ. 208, 107817 (2023).
Geffersa, A. G. Agricultural productivity, land use intensification and rural household welfare: Evidence from Ethiopia. Agrekon 62, 309–327 (2023).
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 20260–20264 (2011).
Haggar, J., Nelson, V., Lamboll, R. & Rodenburg, J. Vol. 19 349–358 (Taylor & Francis, 2021).
Garnett, T. et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science 341, 33–34 (2013).
Kahsay, G. A. & Endalew, Y. G. The role of cooperatives in promoting climate-smart agriculture: Panel evidence from Ethiopia. Agric. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.70011 (2025).
Ma, W., Hong, S., Reed, W. R., Duan, J. & Luu, P. Yield effects of agricultural cooperative membership in developing countries: A meta‐analysis. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 94, 761–780 (2023).
Manda, J. et al. Does cooperative membership increase and accelerate agricultural technology adoption? Empirical evidence from Zambia. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 158, 120160 (2020).
Ainembabazi, J. H. et al. Improving the speed of adoption of agricultural technologies and farm performance through farmer groups: Evidence from the Great Lakes region of Africa. Agric. Econ. 48, 241–259 (2017).
Geffersa, A. G. & Islam, M. M. Beyond subsistence? The role of rural cooperatives in driving smallholder commercialization in Ethiopia. Agribusiness https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21949 (2024).
Fischer, E. & Qaim, M. Linking smallholders to markets: Determinants and impacts of farmer collective action in Kenya. World Dev. 40, 1255–1268 (2012).
Abate, G. T., Francesconi, G. N. & Getnet, K. Impact of agricultural cooperatives on smallholders’ technical efficiency: Empirical evidence from Ethiopia. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 85, 257–286 (2014).
Abate, G. T., Rashid, S., Borzaga, C. & Getnet, K. Rural finance and agricultural technology adoption in Ethiopia: Does the institutional design of lending organizations matter?. World Dev. 84, 235–253 (2016).
Ayompe, L. M., Schaafsma, M. & Egoh, B. N. Towards sustainable palm oil production: The positive and negative impacts on ecosystem services and human wellbeing. J. Clean. Prod. 278, 123914 (2021).
Meijaard, E. & Sheil, D. The moral minefield of ethical oil palm and sustainable development. Front. For. Glob. Change 2, 22 (2019).
Tabe-Ojong, M. P. Jr., Heckelei, T., Baylis, K. & Rasch, S. Cooperative membership and exposure to role models: Implications for income and asset aspirations. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 107, 102119 (2023).
Tabe-Ojong, M. P. Jr. & Nshakira-Rukundo, E. Religiosity and parental educational aspirations for children in Kenya. World Dev. Perspect. 23, 100349 (2021).
Geffersa, A. G. Agricultural cooperative membership and welfare of maize farmers in Ethiopia: Insights from panel data analysis. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 95, 1223–1250 (2024).
Saenger, C., Torero, M. & Qaim, M. Impact of third-party contract enforcement in agricultural markets—A field experiment in Vietnam. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 96, 1220–1238 (2014).
Tabe-Ojong, M. P. J. Do producer organisations promote environmental sustainability through organic soil investments? Evidence from Cameroon. J. Dev. Eff. 15, 453–475 (2023).
Bellemare, M. F. & Wichman, C. J. Elasticities and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 82, 50–61 (2020).
Tabe‐Ojong, M. P. J. Context matters: Oil palm production and women’s dietary diversity in the tropical forest of Cameroon. J. Agric. Econ. 75, 323–340 (2024).
Tabe-Ojong, M. P. Jr. Ecological shocks and non-cognitive skills: Evidence from Kenya. Ecol. Econ. 194, 107330 (2022).
Lokshin, M. & Sajaia, Z. Maximum likelihood estimation of endogenous switching regression models. Stata J. 4, 282–289 (2004).
Di Falco, S., Doku, A. & Mahajan, A. Peer effects and the choice of adaptation strategies. Agric. Econ. 51, 17–30 (2020).
Kubitza, C. & Krishna, V. V. Instrumental variables and the claim of causality: Evidence from impact studies in maize systems. Glob. Food Secur. 26, 100383 (2020).
Tabe‐Ojong, M. P. J., Ibarra, L. M., Andrade, R. S. & Labarta, R. Soil conservation and smallholder welfare under Cassava‐based Systems in Thailand. Land Degrad. Dev. 34, 1795–1805 (2023).
Oster, E. Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 37, 187–204 (2019).
Diegert, P., Masten, M. A. & Poirier, A. Assessing omitted variable bias when the controls are endogenous. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02303 (2022).
Mishra, A. K., Kumar, A., Joshi, P. K. & D’Souza, A. Cooperatives, contract farming, and farm size: The case of tomato producers in Nepal. Agribusiness 34, 865–886 (2018).
Calkins, P. & Ngo, A.-T. The impacts of farmer cooperatives on the well-being of cocoa producing villages in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana. Can. J. Dev. Stud./Rev. Can. d’études Dév. 30, 535–563 (2010).
Shumeta, Z. & D’Haese, M. Do coffee cooperatives benefit farmers? An exploration of heterogeneous impact of coffee cooperative membership in Southwest Ethiopia. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 19, 37–52 (2016).
Ortega, D. L. et al. Cooperative membership and coffee productivity in Rwanda’s specialty coffee sector. Food Secur. 11, 967–979 (2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Martin Paul Jr. Tabe-Ojong: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. Abebayehu G. Geffersa: conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. Kibrom T. Sibhatu: conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tabe-Ojong, M.P.J., Geffersa, A.G. & Sibhatu, K.T. Producer organizations, productivity and sustainable intensification practices in oil palm production. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40384-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40384-y
