Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Efficacy of fully covered self-expanding metal stents removal versus stent-in-stent techniques in recurrent malignant distal biliary obstruction
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 February 2026

Efficacy of fully covered self-expanding metal stents removal versus stent-in-stent techniques in recurrent malignant distal biliary obstruction

  • See Young Lee1,2 na1,
  • Sung Ill Jang2,3 na1,
  • Eui Joo Kim4,
  • Dong Ki Lee2,3,
  • Seoyeon Cho5,
  • Yeseul Seong3,
  • Jung Hyun Jo2,3,
  • Chan Min Jung2,3,
  • In Rae Cho2,6,
  • Woo Hyun Paik6,
  • Ji Kon Ryu6,
  • Hyun Seok Lee7,
  • Sang Hyub Lee6,9 &
  • …
  • Jae Hee Cho2,3,8 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bile duct disease
  • Biliary tract cancer
  • Gastrointestinal cancer
  • Pancreatic cancer

Abstract

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) are widely used in managing malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). However, recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) has become a significant challenge due to improved patient survival with advanced chemotherapy. This multicenter retrospective cohort study evaluated revision techniques for FCSEMS dysfunction in 159 patients with MDBO initially treated with FCSEMSs. Patients were categorized into four groups based on the revision method: stent exchange with self-expandable metal stents (SEMS, n = 53) or plastic stents (n = 23), and stent-in-stent placement with SEMS (n = 51) or plastic stents (n = 32). All procedures achieved 100% technical and clinical success. The primary time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) showed no significant difference among the groups (mean: 148 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 127–170 days). However, secondary TRBO differed significantly (p = 0.014): 161 days (SEMS, stent exchange), 53 days (plastic stent, stent exchange), 104 days (SEMS, stent-in-stent), and 67 days (plastic stent, stent-in-stent). Multivariate analysis revealed that stent-in-stent placement with SEMS increased the risk of RBO compared to SEMS stent exchange (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.53, 95% CI: 1.89–22.55, p = 0.003). Additionally, revision within 180 days was associated with a higher risk of RBO (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.10–2.86, p = 0.019). Overall survival was comparable across all groups. These findings suggest that SEMS stent exchange after FCSEMS removal is an effective revision method for RBO in MDBO, providing improved secondary stent patency without increasing adverse events or affecting overall survival.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Dumonceau, J. M. et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European society of Gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 50, 910–930 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Oh, D. et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy and choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a multicenter retrospective study. Th. Adv. Gastroenterol. 17, 17562848241239551 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Takeda, T. et al. Novel risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction and pancreatitis after metallic stent placement in pancreatic cancer. Endosc Int. Open. 8, E1603–E1610 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miura, S. et al. Risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction following placement of self-expandable metallic stents in patients with malignant Perihilar biliary stricture. Endoscopy 48, 536–545 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kitano, M. et al. Covered self-expandable metal stents with an anti-migration system improve patency duration without increased complications compared with uncovered stents for distal biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized multicenter trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 108, 1713–1722 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chikugo, K. et al. Re-intervention with 10-mm vs 12-mm covered self-expandable metallic stent for recurrent unresectable distal biliary obstruction in patients with previous stent implantation. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 30, 542–549 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, J. H. et al. Comparison of outcomes among secondary covered metallic, uncovered metallic, and plastic biliary stents in treating occluded primary metallic stents in malignant distal biliary obstruction. Surg. Endosc. 25, 475–482 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Naitoh, I. & Inoue, T. Optimal endoscopic drainage strategy for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Clin. Endosc. 56, 135–142 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Takenaka, M. & Kudo, M. Endoscopic reintervention for recurrence of malignant biliary obstruction: developing the best strategy. Gut Liver. 16, 525–534 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ito, K., Ogawa, T., Horaguchi, J., Koshita, S. & Fujita, N. Reintervention for occluded biliary metal stent for patients with malignant distal biliary stricture. Dig. Endosc. 25 (Suppl 2), 126–131 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tejedor-Tejada, J. et al. Secondary uncovered versus fully-covered metal stents for the management of occluded stent in unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 47, 502218 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Asada, S. et al. Efficacy of multi-hole self–expandable metallic stents versus partially covered self–expandable metallic stents in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction caused by unresectable pancreatic cancer: a retrospective comparative cohort study in Japan. Clin. Endosc. 58, 744–756 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chung, K. H. et al. Efficacy and safety of covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 101, 350–357 (2025). e310.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, C. H. et al. Efficacy of fully covered Self-Expandable metal stents for distal biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: primary metal stent vs. metal stent following plastic stent. Cancers (Basel) 15 (2023).

  15. Almadi, M. A., Barkun, A. & Martel, M. Plastic vs. Self-Expandable metal stents for palliation in malignant biliary obstruction: A series of Meta-Analyses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 112, 260–273 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gomez, C. A. M. et al. Covered vs. Uncovered Self-Expandable metallic stents (SEMS) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 69 (2009).

  17. Togawa, O. et al. Management of dysfunctional covered self-expandable metallic stents in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction. J. Gastroenterol. 48, 1300–1307 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mizrahi, J. D., Surana, R., Valle, J. W. & Shroff, R. T. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 395, 2008–2020 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Valle, J. W., Kelley, R. K., Nervi, B., Oh, D. Y. & Zhu, A. X. Biliary tract cancer. Lancet 397, 428–444 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nennstiel, S. et al. Management of occluded self-expanding biliary metal stents in malignant biliary disease. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 17, 49–54 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Isayama, H. et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for distal malignant biliary stricture. Gastrointest. Endosc Clin. N Am. 22, 479–490 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ridtitid, W. et al. Outcome of second interventions for occluded metallic stents in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Surg. Endosc. 24, 2216–2220 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bueno, J. T., Gerdes, H. & Kurtz, R. C. Endoscopic management of occluded biliary wallstents: a cancer center experience. Gastrointest. Endosc. 58, 879–884 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, H., Khizar, H., Ali, A. & Yang, J. Safety and efficacy of side-by-side versus stent-in-stent stenting for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Th. Adv. Gastroenterol. 17, 17562848241271962 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tringali, A. et al. Covered vs. uncovered self-expandable metal stents for malignant distal biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 50, 631–641 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Takahashi, S. et al. Efficacy and safety of a novel multi-hole fully covered self-expandable metallic stent for malignant distal biliary obstruction: multicenter retrospective study. Dig. Endosc. 37, 766–774 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yamada, Y. et al. A novel laser-cut fully covered metal stent with anti-reflux valve in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction refractory to conventional covered metal stent. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 28, 563–571 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yamada, M. et al. Outcomes of intraductal placement of covered metal stents for unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction. J Clin. Med 12 (2023).

  29. Miyazawa, M. et al. Efficacy of a novel self-expandable metal stent with dumbbell-shaped flare ends for distal biliary obstruction due to unresectable pancreatic cancer. Sci. Rep. 12, 21100 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Isayama, H. et al. TOKYO criteria 2014 for transpapillary biliary stenting. Dig. Endosc. 27, 259–264 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nakai, Y., Hamada, T., Isayama, H., Itoi, T. & Koike, K. Endoscopic management of combined malignant biliary and gastric outlet obstruction. Dig. Endosc. 29, 16–25 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mutignani, M. et al. Combined endoscopic stent insertion in malignant biliary and duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy 39, 440–447 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dumonceau, J. M. et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European society of Gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 52, 127–149 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors have no acknowledgements to declare.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Korea government (No. NRF-2022R1A2C1009842), and a new faculty research initiation grant from Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2024 (2024-32-0044).

Author information

Author notes
  1. See Young Lee and Sung Ill Jang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    See Young Lee

  2. Graduate School of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    See Young Lee, Sung Ill Jang, Dong Ki Lee, Jung Hyun Jo, Chan Min Jung, In Rae Cho & Jae Hee Cho

  3. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Sung Ill Jang, Dong Ki Lee, Yeseul Seong, Jung Hyun Jo, Chan Min Jung & Jae Hee Cho

  4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

    Eui Joo Kim

  5. Department of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Seoyeon Cho

  6. Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    In Rae Cho, Woo Hyun Paik, Ji Kon Ryu & Sang Hyub Lee

  7. Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea

    Hyun Seok Lee

  8. Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonjuro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea

    Jae Hee Cho

  9. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea

    Sang Hyub Lee

Authors
  1. See Young Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sung Ill Jang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eui Joo Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dong Ki Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seoyeon Cho
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yeseul Seong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jung Hyun Jo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chan Min Jung
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. In Rae Cho
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Woo Hyun Paik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ji Kon Ryu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hyun Seok Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sang Hyub Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Jae Hee Cho
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Data curation: S. Y. Lee, S. I. Jang, E. J. Kim, D. K. Lee, H. S. Lee, I. R. Cho, W. H. Paik, J. K. Ryu, S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Formal analysis: S. Y. Lee; Funding acquisition: S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Investigation: S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Methodology: S. Y. Lee, S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Software: S. Y. Lee, Y. Seong, S. Cho; Validation: S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Visualization: S. Y. Lee, S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Writing—original draft: S. Y. Lee, S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho; Writing—review & editing: S. Y. Lee, S. I. Jang, E. J. Kim, D. K. Lee, H. S. Lee, I. R. Cho, W. H. Paik, J. K. Ryu, S. H. Lee, J. H. Cho.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sang Hyub Lee or Jae Hee Cho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.Y., Jang, S.I., Kim, E.J. et al. Efficacy of fully covered self-expanding metal stents removal versus stent-in-stent techniques in recurrent malignant distal biliary obstruction. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40409-6

Download citation

  • Received: 30 January 2025

  • Accepted: 12 February 2026

  • Published: 24 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40409-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Malignant distal biliary obstruction
  • Recurrent biliary obstruction
  • Revision method
  • Stent patency
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer