Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions of case-based learning in preclinical physiology within a resource limited setting: a qualitative study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 February 2026

Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions of case-based learning in preclinical physiology within a resource limited setting: a qualitative study

  • Arsalan Ahmed Uqaili1,
  • Uzair Abbas2,
  • Afshan Mehboob Khan2,
  • Abeer Memon3,
  • Ghazala Masood Farrukh2 &
  • …
  • Tazeen Shah1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 28 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Education
  • Health care
  • Medical humanities

Abstract

Case-based learning (CBL) is widely promoted in medical education to enhance engagement, conceptual understanding, and early clinical reasoning. However, most evidence supporting its effectiveness originates from well-resourced institutions, and their feasibility and impact within resource-limited preclinical settings remain uncertain, where large class sizes, limited infrastructure, and reliance on didactic teaching persist. This qualitative descriptive study explored undergraduate medical students’ perceptions of CBL implementation in preclinical physiology at a public-sector medical university. Four focus group discussions were conducted with 30 second-year Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) students. Data was audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke’s framework. Students valued CBL for promoting active participation, improved conceptual clarity, knowledge retention, and early development of clinical reasoning. However, its effectiveness was moderated by contextual constraints, including limited time, inconsistent facilitation, restricted clinical exposure, and lack of visual learning resources. Participants proposed feasible adaptations such as simplified case design, phased progression of complexity, standardized facilitation, and incorporation of low-cost multimedia aids. These findings suggest that while CBL is pedagogically valuable, successful implementation in resource-limited preclinical environments requires deliberate contextual adaptation rather than direct adoption of models developed in high-resource settings.

Data availability

The qualitative data generated and analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to ethical and confidentiality considerations associated with focus group discussions. De-identified transcripts and the coding framework may be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to institutional ethical approval.

References

  1. Bligh, D. What’s the Use of Lectures?. J. Geogr. High. Educ. 9(1), 105–106 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dave, U. S., Kumar, A. & Sadariya, B. R. Comparison of case-based learning with didactic lectures in undergraduate physiology curriculum. Natl. J. Physiol. Pharm. Pharmacol. 12(11), 1821–1824 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knowles MS, Holton III EF, Swanson RA. The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development: Routledge; 2014.

  4. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development: FT press; 2014.

  5. McLean, S. F. Case-based learning and its application in medical and health-care fields: A review of worldwide literature. J. Med. Educ. Curric. Dev. 3, JMECD. S20377 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sistermans, I. J. Integrating competency-based education with a case-based or problem-based learning approach in online health sciences. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 21(4), 683–696 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maia, D. et al. Academic performance and perceptions of undergraduate medical students in case-based learning compared to other teaching strategies: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Educ. Sci. 13(3), 238 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. McLean, M., Cilliers, F. & Van Wyk, J. M. Faculty development: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med. Teach. 30(6), 555–584 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oo YM, Nataraja R, editors. The application of simulation-based medical education in low-and middle-income countries; the Myanmar experience. Seminars in pediatric surgery; 2020: Elsevier.

  10. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mukhalalati, B., Yakti, O. & Elshami, S. A scoping review of the questionnaires used for the assessment of the perception of undergraduate students of the learning environment in healthcare professions education programs. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 29(4), 1501–1538 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khalid, A. M. et al. Perceptions of medical students in Pakistan, KSA, and the US regarding the significance of case-based learning. J. Taibah Univ. Med. Sci. 16(3), 344–349 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zaidi, S. A. A. et al. Comparing dental undergraduates’ perceptions regarding case-based learning and problem-based learning: A Karachi multi-center survey. Ann. Abbasi Shaheed Hosp. Karachi Med. Dent. Coll. 29(2), 178–186 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer, R. E. The future of multimedia learning. J. Appl. Instr. Des. 11(4), 69–77 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ali, R. et al. Transforming education: Case-based integrated learning development and implementation–a mixed methods study at a private medical college. J. Adv. Med. Educ. Prof. 13(1), 49 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., Roberts, C. & Mellis, C. Facilitating small group learning in the health professions. BMC Med. Educ. 20, 1–6 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Modell, H. I. How to help students understand physiology? Emphasize general models. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 23(1), S101–S107 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the participants and faculty members of department of Physiology, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physiology, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan

    Arsalan Ahmed Uqaili & Tazeen Shah

  2. Department of Physiology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan

    Uzair Abbas, Afshan Mehboob Khan & Ghazala Masood Farrukh

  3. Department of Medicine, Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan

    Abeer Memon

Authors
  1. Arsalan Ahmed Uqaili
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Uzair Abbas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Afshan Mehboob Khan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abeer Memon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ghazala Masood Farrukh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tazeen Shah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception/design of the work: UA, AAU, AMK, GMF Data collection: UA, AAU, AM, ZK, TS, GMF Data analysis and interpretation: UA, TS, AAU, ZK, AM, AMK Drafting the article: UA, TS, AAU, ZK, AM, AMK, GMF Critical revision of the article, and final approval: UA, TS, AAU, ZK, AM, AMK, GMF All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uzair Abbas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participants

Research ethics committee of Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences (LUMHS) granted ethical approval for this study (approval number LUMHS/REC/2024/1016). All participants were recruited in the study after written informed consent according to guidelines of declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uqaili, A.A., Abbas, U., Khan, A.M. et al. Undergraduate medical students’ perceptions of case-based learning in preclinical physiology within a resource limited setting: a qualitative study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40750-w

Download citation

  • Received: 25 December 2025

  • Accepted: 16 February 2026

  • Published: 22 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40750-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Case-based learning
  • Physiology education
  • Medical education
  • Resource-limited setting
  • Qualitative research
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing