Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
A scanning electron microscopy—based approach to explore subpodocyte space remodeling in diabetic kidneys of mice and humans
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 February 2026

A scanning electron microscopy—based approach to explore subpodocyte space remodeling in diabetic kidneys of mice and humans

  • Sara Conti1,
  • Ariela Benigni1,
  • Giuseppe Remuzzi1 &
  • …
  • Susanna Tomasoni1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biological techniques
  • Cell biology
  • Diseases
  • Nephrology

Abstract

Ultrastructural analysis of the subpodocyte space (SPS) is essential to understanding podocyte injury in diabetic nephropathy, where SPS expansion represents an early marker of glomerular dysfunction. While traditionally assessed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we previously established a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) protocol enabling high-resolution SPS visualization in perfused kidney tissue. However, perfusion-based fixation, though effective in animal models, is not feasible in patients during the biopsy retrieval. To overcome these limitations, we developed a rapid SEM protocol based on secondary electron detection, specifically optimized for non-perfused samples. Using a paired design in healthy and diabetic (BTBR ob/ob) mice, we compared perfused and contralateral non-perfused kidneys, showing that SPS morphology and quantification remained accurate even in the absence of perfusion. The protocol was successfully applied to human kidney biopsies from controls and diabetic patients, allowing reliable SPS assessment and ultrastructural analysis across entire glomerular cross-sections. This optimized SEM protocol provides a reliable and versatile approach for SPS analysis in both non-perfused preclinical models and human kidney biopsies, thus broadening its applicability to clinically relevant settings.

Data availability

The data generated in the present article is available upon request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Conti, S., Remuzzi, G., Benigni, A. & Tomasoni, S. Imaging the kidney with an unconventional scanning electron microscopy technique: Analysis of the subpodocyte space in diabetic mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 1699 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Remuzzi, A. Role of ultrastructural determinants of glomerular permeability in ultrafiltration function loss. JCI Insight 5(13), e137249. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.137249 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neal, C. R. Podocytes … what’s under yours? (Podocytes and foot processes and how they change in nephropathy). Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 6, 9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neal, C. R. et al. Glomerular filtration into the subpodocyte space is highly restricted under physiological perfusion conditions. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 293, F1787-1798 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldstein, J. I. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis (Springer New York, 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman, M. A. & Leif, R. C. A wet chemical method for rendering scanning electron microscopy samples conductive and observations on the surface morphology of human erythrocytes and Ehrlich ascites cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 70, 3599–3603 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Erdman, N., Bell, D. C. & Reichelt, R. Scanning Electron Microscopy. (Springer, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer, E. R., Hansen, B. T., Nair, V., Hoyt, F. H. & Dorward, D. W. Scanning electron microscopy. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. CHAPTER, Unit2B.2 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fioretto, P. & Mauer, M. Histopathology of diabetic nephropathy. Semin. Nephrol. 27, 195–207 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Conti, S. et al. Early and late scanning electron microscopy findings in diabetic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 8, 4909 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carrara, C. et al. Histological examination of the diabetic kidney. Methods Mol. Biol. 2067, 63–87 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gagliardini, E., Conti, S., Benigni, A., Remuzzi, G. & Remuzzi, A. Imaging of the porous ultrastructure of the glomerular epithelial filtration slit. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 21, 2081–2089 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Percie du Sert. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000411 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Locatelli, M. et al. Empagliflozin protects glomerular endothelial cell architecture in experimental diabetes through the VEGF-A/caveolin-1/PV-1 signaling pathway. J. Pathol. 256, 468–479 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stereologkal methods vol 1: Practical methods for biological morphometry: By E. R. Weibel Academic Press Inc., London, 415 pages, many figures and tables, $57,50 ISBN 0-12-742201-3. Scanning 4, 208–208 (1981). (1979).

  16. Macconi, D. et al. Pathophysiologic implications of reduced podocyte number in a rat model of progressive glomerular injury. Am. J. Pathol. 168, 42–54 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Macconi, D. et al. Podocyte repopulation contributes to regression of glomerular injury induced by ACE inhibition. Am. J. Pathol. 174, 797–807 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cazaux, J. Charging in scanning electron microscopy ‘from inside and outside’. Scanning 26, 181–203 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, H.-B., Feng, R.-J. & Ura, K. Utilizing the charging effect in scanning electron microscopy. Sci. Prog. 87, 249–268 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mohandes, S. et al. Molecular pathways that drive diabetic kidney disease. J. Clin. Invest. 133, e165654 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pagtalunan, M. E. et al. Podocyte loss and progressive glomerular injury in type II diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 99, 342–348 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Remuzzi, G., Schieppati, A. & Ruggenenti, P. Clinical practice. Nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 1145–1151 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Remuzzi, G., Benigni, A. & Remuzzi, A. Mechanisms of progression and regression of renal lesions of chronic nephropathies and diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 288–296 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tervaert, T. W. C. et al. Pathologic classification of diabetic nephropathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 21, 556–563 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Isaac, J., Tögel, F. E. & Westenfelder, C. Extent of glomerular tubularization is an indicator of the severity of experimental acute kidney injury in mice. Nephron. Exp. Nephrol. 105, e33-40 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kriz, W., Hähnel, B., Hosser, H., Rösener, S. & Waldherr, R. Structural analysis of how podocytes detach from the glomerular basement membrane under hypertrophic stress. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 5, 207 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reimer, L. & Tollkamp, C. Measuring the backscattering coefficient and secondary electron yield inside a scanning electron microscope. J. Scanning Microscopy. 3, 35–39 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fernandes, H. P., Cesar, C. L. & Barjas-Castro, M. Electrical properties of the red blood cell membrane and immunohematological investigation. Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 33, 297–301 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fischer, E. R., Hansen, B. T., Nair, V., Hoyt, F. H. & Dorward, D. W. Scanning electron microscopy. Curr Protoc. 4(5), e1034 (2024).

  30. Ul-Hamid, A. Imaging with the SEM In (ed. Ul-Hamid, A.) (2018).

  31. Inada, H. et al. Atomic imaging using secondary electrons in a scanning transmission electron microscope: experimental observations and possible mechanisms. Ultramicroscopy 111, 865–876 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, J. et al. A modified method of intracardiac perfusion fixation for tissue preparation. Adv. Orthop. 1, 75–82 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kallerhoff, M. et al. A New Method for Renal Perfusion Fixation (in (Springer, 1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75972-7_37

  34. Andrews, P. M. & Coffey, A. K. A technique to reduce fixation artifacts to kidney proximal tubules. Kidney Int. 25, 964–968 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fuhrmann, A., Pritz, B., Endlich, K. & Kriz, W. Numerical Flow Simulations of the Shear Stress Forces Arising in Filtration Slits during Glomerular Filtration in Rat Kidney. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 36, 219–230 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Neal, C. R., Crook, H., Bell, E., Harper, S. J. & Bates, D. O. Three-dimensional reconstruction of glomeruli by electron microscopy reveals a distinct restrictive urinary subpodocyte space. J Am Soc Nephrol 16, 1223–1235 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Burghardt, T. et al. Advanced electron microscopic techniques provide a deeper insight into the peculiar features of podocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 309, F1082-1089 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Arkill, K. P. et al. Resolution of the three dimensional structure of components of the glomerular filtration barrier. BMC Nephrol. 15, 24 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pearson, J. M., McWilliam, L. J., Coyne, J. D. & Curry, A. Value of electron microscopy in diagnosis of renal disease. J. Clin. Pathol. 47, 126–128 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tucker, J. A. The continuing value of electron microscopy in surgical pathology. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 24, 383–389 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ivanyi, B., Kemeny, E., Szederkenyi, E., Marofka, F. & Szenohradszky, P. The value of electron microscopy in the diagnosis of chronic renal allograft rejection. Mod. Pathol. 14, 1200–1208 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dittmayer, C., Völcker, E., Wacker, I., Schröder, R. R. & Bachmann, S. Modern field emission scanning electron microscopy provides new perspectives for imaging kidney ultrastructure. Kidney Int. 94, 625–631 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Honda, K., Takaki, T. & Kang, D. Recent advances in electron microscopy for the diagnosis and research of glomerular diseases. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 42, 155–165 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Toska, E. & Roberts, S. G. E. Mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by WT1 (Wilms’ tumour 1). Biochem. J. 461, 15–32 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guo, J.-K. WT1 is a key regulator of podocyte function: Reduced expression levels cause crescentic glomerulonephritis and mesangial sclerosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 651–659 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lu, J., Zhang, X., Liu, H. & Liu, Y. Exploring the multifaceted role of WT1 in kidney development and disease. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 50, 176–188 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Su, J. et al. Evaluation of podocyte lesion in patients with diabetic nephropathy: Wilms’ tumor-1 protein used as a podocyte marker. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 87, 167–175 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Andrea Remuzzi for critical discussions and helpful suggestions. We also thank Daniela Corna, Domenico Cerullo and Daniela Rottoli for their technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Centro Anna Maria Astori, Science and Technology Park Kilometro Rosso, Via Stezzano, 87, Bergamo, 24126, Italy

    Sara Conti, Ariela Benigni, Giuseppe Remuzzi & Susanna Tomasoni

Authors
  1. Sara Conti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ariela Benigni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuseppe Remuzzi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Susanna Tomasoni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.C. performed the experiments and collected data; S.C. and S.T. developed the concept, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript; S.T., G.R., and A.B. supervised the experiments and approved the final results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Conti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to publish this manuscript.

Ethics approval

The IRFMN adheres to the principles set out in the following laws, regulations, and policies governing the care and use of laboratory animals: Italian Governing Law (D.Lgs 26/2014; Authorisation n. 35/2023-UT issued November 8, 2023 by Ministry of Health); Mario Negri Institutional Regulations and Policies providing internal authorisation for persons conducting animal experiments (Quality Management System Certificate – UNI EN ISO 9001:2015 – Reg. N° 6121; the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (2011 edition) and EU directives and guidelines (EEC Council Directive 2010/63/UE). This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS and by the Italian Ministry of Health (approval number 712/2019-PR). All experimental protocols involving human subjects are carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical guidelines. All patient information was anonymized and handled in accordance with institutional and ethical standards. As this study involved the use of de-identified archival biopsy material, informed consent was waived by the Territorial Ethics Committee Lombardia 6 of the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy. The study was approved by Territorial Ethics Committee Lombardia 6 of the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy (procedure 2025 − 3.11/463).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conti, S., Benigni, A., Remuzzi, G. et al. A scanning electron microscopy—based approach to explore subpodocyte space remodeling in diabetic kidneys of mice and humans. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40816-9

Download citation

  • Received: 27 November 2025

  • Accepted: 16 February 2026

  • Published: 21 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40816-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Scanning electron microscopy
  • Subpodocyte space
  • Diabetic nephropathy
  • SE-SEM imaging
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing