Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Characterization of volcanic tuff pores pre- and post-underground nuclear detonation using ultra-small and small angle neutron scattering
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 February 2026

Characterization of volcanic tuff pores pre- and post-underground nuclear detonation using ultra-small and small angle neutron scattering

  • Mei Ding1,2,
  • Rex P. Hjelm1,3,
  • Marilyn E. Hawley1,
  • Aviva J. Sussman4,
  • Scott T. Broome4,
  • Jennifer E. Wilson4,
  • John G. Barker5,
  • Erika M. Swanson1 &
  • …
  • Chelsea W. Neil1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

The ability to accurately model the subsurface transport of radionuclides is fundamental to the remote detection and characterization of underground nuclear explosion (UNE) events. Developing more sophisticated transport models presents a significant opportunity to enhance monitoring capabilities, particularly in the reliable prediction of signature migration. Experimentally determined characterization of geologic materials associated with transport properties is the pertinent base information for such robust model development and calibration. Here, we report results from an unprecedented study demonstrating changes to the pore and fracture network structures in geological materials in response to UNEs over nanometer to micrometer length scales. Volcanic tuffs of five different lithological formations from pre- and post-UNE environments were collected from the Nevada National Security Site. Combined ultra-small and small-angle neutron scattering techniques were used to characterize the tuff pore structure. The results demonstrate measurable differences in the specific surface area and porosity of samples pre- and post-shot from texturally similar lithological formations, indicating that pore properties can serve as a direct physical signature of a UNE. The results also provide experimentally determined transport parameters in support of advanced model development through the integration of gas migration, hydrodynamic simulations, and geologic framework models.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Zenodo repository, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17613298.

References

  1. Bowyer, T. W. et al. Detection and analysis of xenon isotopes for the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty international monitoring system. J. Environ. Radioact. 59(2), 139–151 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carrigan, C. R., Heinle, R. A., Hudson, G. B., Nitao, J. J. & Zucca, J. J. Trace gas emissions on geological faults as indicators of underground nuclear testing. Nature 382 (6591), 528–531 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carrigan, C. R. et al. Delayed signatures of underground nuclear explosions. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 23032 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schulze, J., Auer, M. & Werzi, R. Low level radioactivity measurement in support of the CTBTO. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 53 (1–2), 23–30 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jordan, A. B., Stauffer, P. H., Knight, E. E., Rougier, E. & Anderson, D. N. Radionuclide gas transport through nuclear explosion-generated fracture networks. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 18383 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jordan, A. B. et al. Uncertainty in prediction of radionuclide gas migration from underground nuclear explosions. Vadose Zone J. 13(10), vzj2014-06 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lowrey, J. D., Biegalski, S. R. & Deinert, M. R. UTEX modeling of radioxenon isotopic fractionation resulting from subsurface transport. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 296(1), 129–134 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sun, Y. & Carrigan, C. R. Modeling noble gas transport and detection for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Pure Appl. Geophys. 171(3), 735–750 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Agbotui, P. Y., Firouzbehi, F. & Medici, G. Review of effective porosity in sandstone aquifers: Insights for representation of contaminant transport. Sustainability 17(14), 6469 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dai, Z. et al. Identification of sorption processes and parameters for radionuclide transport in fractured rock. J. Hydrol. 414, 220–230 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Paolo, D. J. & Orr, F. M. Geoscience research for our energy future. Phys. Today 61(8), 46–51 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quinn, P., Cherry, J. A. & Parker, B. L. Hydraulic testing using a versatile straddle packer system for improved transmissivity estimation in fractured-rock boreholes. Hydrogeol. J. 20 (8), 1529–1547 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Samper, J. et al. Interpretation of solute transport experiments in compacted Ca-bentonites using inverse modeling. Migration 2005 Conference. Report no. INIS-FR-5478. (2005).

  14. Binley, A. et al. The emergence of hydrogeophysics for improved understanding of subsurface processes over multiple scales. Water Resour. Res. 51(6), 3837–3866 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, M. Self-sealing/healing isolation and immobilization caused by chemical discontinuities in porous media. ISBN: 90-5744-022-9, Ponsen en Looijen by Wageningen, 151p. (1998).

  16. Ding, M., Geusebroek, M. & Van der Sloot, H. A. Interface precipitation affects the resistance to transport in layered jarosite/fly ash. J. Geochem. Explor. 62(1–3), 319–323 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verberne, B. A., Plümper, O., de Winter, M., Spiers, C. J. & D.A. and Superplastic nanofibrous slip zones control seismogenic fault friction. Science 346 (6215), 1342–1344 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Allen, A. J. Time-resolved phenomena in cements, clays and porous rocks. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24(5), 624–634 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Emmanuel, S., Ague, J. J. & Walderhaug, O. Interfacial energy effects and the evolution of pore size distributions during quartz precipitation in sandstone. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74(12), 3539–3552 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Emmanuel, S. & Berkowitz, B. Effects of pore-size controlled solubility on reactive transport in heterogeneous rock. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L06404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028962 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, C. J., Wang, G. X., Sang, S. X. & Rudolph, V. Changes in pore structure of anthracite coal associated with CO2 sequestration process. Fuel 89 (10), 2665–2672 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Navarre-Sitchler, A. K. et al. Porosity and surface area evolution during weathering of two igneous rocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 109, 400–413 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peach, C. J. & Spiers, C. J. Influence of crystal plastic deformation on dilatancy and permeability development in synthetic salt rock. Tectonophysics 256 (1–4), 101–128 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mang, J. T. & Hjelm, R. P. July. SANS and contrast variation measurement of the different contributions to the total surface area in PBX 9501 as a function of pressing intensity. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 845, No. 1, pp. 1271–1274). American Institute of Physics. (2006).

  25. Mang, J. T. & Hjelm, R. P. Small-angle neutron scattering and contrast variation measurement of the interfacial surface area in PBX 9501 as a function of pressing intensity. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 36(5), 439–445 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mang, J. T. & Hjelm, R. P. Fractal networks of inter-granular voids in pressed TATB. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 38(6), 831–840 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mang, J. T., Hjelm, R. P. & Francois, E. G. Measurement of porosity in a composite high explosive as a function of pressing conditions by ultra-small‐angle neutron scattering with contrast variation. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 35(1), 7–14 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mang, J. T., Skidmore, C. B., Hjelm, R. P. & Howe, P. M. Application of small-angle neutron scattering to the study of porosity in energetic materials. J. Mater. Res. 15 (5), 1199–1208 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Willey, T. M. et al. Changes in pore size distribution upon thermal cycling of TATB-based explosives measured by ultra‐small angle X‐ray scattering. Propellants Explos. Pyrotech. 31(6), 466–471 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Geng, Y., Liang, W., Liu, J., Cao, M. & Kang, Z. Evolution of pore and fracture structure of oil shale under high temperature and high pressure. Energy Fuels. 31 (10), 10404–10413 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. King, H. E. Jr et al. Pore architecture and connectivity in gas shale. Energy Fuels. 29 (3), 1375–1390 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tiwari, P., Deo, M., Lin, C. L. & Miller, J. D. Characterization of oil shale pore structure before and after pyrolysis by using X-ray micro CT. Fuel 107, 547–554 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chaudhuri, A., Rajaram, H., Viswanathan, H., Zyvoloski, G. & Stauffer, P. Buoyant convection resulting from dissolution and permeability growth in vertical limestone fractures. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L03401. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036533 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dewers, T. A. et al. Oedometric small-angle neutron scattering: In situ observation of nanopore structure during bentonite consolidation and swelling in dry and hydrous CO2 environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52(6), 3758–3768 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ding, M. et al. Pore characteristics and their evolution in clays using small angle neutron scattering. In 14th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference: Integrating Storage, Transportation, and Disposal, IHLRWMC 2013 (pp. 241–246). (2013).

  36. Johnson, P. J., Zyvoloski, G. A. & Stauffer, P. H. Impact of a porosity-dependent retention function on simulations of porous flow. Transp. Porous Media 127(1), 211–232 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Swanson, E. M., Wilson, J. E. & Sussman, A. J. Lithologic controls on microfracturing from legacy underground nuclear explosions. GSA Bull. 135(7–8), 1635–1651 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mehmani, Y. & Balhoff, M. T. Mesoscale and hybrid models of fluid flow and solute transport. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 80(1), 433–459 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Røyne, A. & Jamtveit, B. Pore-scale controls on reaction-driven fracturing. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 80 (1), 25–44 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Chipman, V., Mellors, R., Milbrath, B., Sussman, A. & Vigil, S. Underground Nuclear Explosion Signatures Experiment (UNESE) Science Plan (DOE/NV/25946 – 2264, 2015).

  41. Williams, B. J. et al. Multiphenomenology explosion monitoring (MultiPEM): A general framework for data interpretation and yield estimation. Geophys. J. Int. 226(1), 14–32 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Broome, S. T., Ingraham, M. D. & Barrow, P. C. Permeability and direct shear test determinations of Barnwell core in support of UNESE (No. SAND-2018-9134) (Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), 2018). Albuquerque, NM (United States).

  43. Pohlmann, K., Hassan, A. & Chapman, J. Description of hydrogeologic heterogeneity and evaluation of radionuclide transport at an underground nuclear test. J. Contam. Hydrol. 44 (3–4), 353–386 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Anovitz, L. M. et al. Effect of quartz overgrowth precipitation on the multiscale porosity of sandstone: A (U) SANS and imaging analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 158, 199–222 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Anovitz, L. M. et al. Diagenetic changes in macro-to nano-scale porosity in the St. Peter Sandstone: An (ultra) small angle neutron scattering and backscattered electron imaging analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 102, 280–305 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, H. W. et al. Multi-scale characterization of pore evolution in a combustion metamorphic complex, Hatrurim basin, Israel: Combining (ultra) small-angle neutron scattering and image analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 121, 339–362 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Neil, C. W. et al. Probing oil recovery in shale nanopores with small-angle and ultra-small-angle neutron scattering. Int. J. Coal Geol. 253, 103950 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Neil, C. W. et al. Small-angle neutron scattering investigation of oil recovery in mineralogically distinct Wolfcamp shale strata. Energy Fuels. 37 (7), 4937–4947 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Radlinski, A. P. Small-angle neutron scattering and the microstructure of rocks. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 63(1), 363–397 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Radlinski, A. P. et al. Angstrom-to-millimeter characterization of sedimentary rock microstructure. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 274(2), 607–612 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Triolo, R. & Agamalian, M. The combined ultra-small-and small-angle neutron scattering (USANS/SANS) technique for earth sciences. In Neutron Applications in Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences (eds Liang, L. et al.) 571–594 (Springer US, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Xu, H. Probing nanopore structure and confined fluid behavior in shale matrix: A review on small-angle neutron scattering studies. Int. J. Coal Geol. 217, 103325 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Carle, S. F. Interpretation of Mineralogical Diagenesis for Assessment of Radionuclide Transport at Pahute Mesa, Nevada National Security Site (Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), 2020). No. LLNL-TR-810225(United States).

  54. Huckins-Gang, H. B., Larotonda, J. M., Eleogram, B. R., McKenna, I. J. & Burt, C. B. Reconstruction of Pre-and Post-Test Surfaces at the U-20az BARNWELL Site, Nevada National Security Site (No. DOE/NV/03624 – 1068). 1–23 (Nevada National Security Site/Mission Support and Test Services LLC (NNSS/MSTS), North Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2021).

  55. Ilavsky, J. & Jemian, P. R. Irena: Tool suite for modeling and analysis of small-angle scattering. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42(2), 347–353 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sears, V. F. Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections. Neutron News. 3 (3), 26–37 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Beaucage, G. Approximations leading to a unified exponential/power-law approach to small-angle scattering. Appl. Crystallogr. 28 (6), 717–728 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Neil, C. W. et al. Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) characterization of clay-and carbonate-rich shale at elevated pressures. Energy Fuels. 34 (7), 8178–8185 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Eaton, B. A. The effect of overburden stress on geopressure prediction from well logs. J. Pet. Technol. 24(08), 929–934 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Millington, R. J. & Quirk, J. P. Permeability of porous solids. Trans. Faraday Soc. 57, 1200–1207 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Neil, C. W., Swager, K. C., Bourret, S. M., Ortiz, J. P. & Stauffer, P. H. Rethinking porosity-based diffusivity estimates for sorptive gas transport at variable temperatures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58 (42), 18903–18914 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Heath, J. E., Kuhlman, K. L., Broome, S. T., Wilson, J. E. & Malama, B. Heterogeneous multiphase flow properties of volcanic rocks and implications for noble gas transport from underground nuclear explosions. Vadose Zone J. 20(3), e20123 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Neil, C. W. et al. Unravelling the origins of shale nanoporosity using small-angle neutron scattering (SANS). Fuel 389, 134578 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Pal, A. K., Garia, S., Ravi, K. & Nair, A. M. Pore scale image analysis for petrophysical modelling. Micron 154, 103195 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Wilson, J. E., Goodwin, L. B. & Lewis, C. J. Deformation bands in nonwelded ignimbrites: Petrophysical controls on fault-zone deformation and evidence of preferential fluid flow. Geology 31(10), 837–840 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Carrigan, C. R. & Sun, Y. Detection of noble gas radionuclides from an underground nuclear explosion during a CTBT on-site inspection. Pure Appl. Geophys. 171(3), 717–734 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Glinka, C. J. et al. The 30 m small-angle neutron scattering instruments at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 31(3), 430–445 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Debye, P. A. J. H., Anderson, H. R. Jr. & Brumberger, H. Scattering by an inhomogeneous solid. II. The correlation function and its application. J. Appl. Phys. 28(6), 679–683 (1957).

  69. Barker, J. G. et al. Design and performance of a thermal-neutron double-crystal diffractometer for USANS at NIST. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 38(6), 1004–1011 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Lake, J. A. An iterative method of slit-correcting small angle X-ray data. Acta Crystallogr. 23(2), 191–194 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kline, S. R. Reduction and analysis of SANS and USANS data using IGOR Pro. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39(6), 895–900 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gu, X. & Mildner, D. F. R. Ultra-small-angle neutron scattering with azimuthal asymmetry. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 49(3), 934–943 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Mazumder, S. & Sequeira, A. Multiple small-angle scattering—A review. Pramana 38 (2), 95–159 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Anovitz, L. M. & Cole, D. R. Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore structures. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 80(1), 61–164 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Teixeira, J. Small-angle scattering by fractal systems. Appl. Crystallogr. 21 (6), 781–785 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Pfeifer, P. & Avnir, D. Chemistry in noninteger dimensions between two and three. I. Fractal theory of heterogeneous surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 79 (7), 3558–3565 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Martin, J. E. Scattering exponents for polydisperse surface and mass fractals. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 19(1), 25–27 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Martin, J. E. & Hurd, A. J. Scattering from fractals. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 20(2), 61–78 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wong, P. Z., Howard, J. & Lin, J. S. Surface roughening and the fractal nature of rocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57(5), 637 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This Low Yield Nuclear Monitoring (LYNM) research was funded by the National Nuclear Security Administration, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development (NNSA DNN R&D). The authors acknowledge important interdisciplinary collaboration with scientists and engineers from LANL, LLNL, NNSS, PNNL, and SNL. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy through the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos National Laboratory is operated by Triad National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy (Contract No. 89233218CNA000001). Samples were collected and analyzed as part of the Underground Nuclear Explosion Signatures Experiment (UNESE). UNESE was created to apply a broad range of research and development (R&D) techniques and technologies to nuclear explosion monitoring and nuclear nonproliferation. It was a multi-year research and development project sponsored by the NNSA DNN R&D, and was collaboratively executed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Mission Support and Test Services, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and Sandia National Laboratories. The authors acknowledge the Center for Neutron Research (CNR) at National Institute of Standards and Technology for access to Small Angle Neutron Scattering (SANS). Access to Ultra-Small Angle Neutron Scattering (USANS) was provided by the Center for High Resolution Neutron Scattering, a partnership between the National Institute of Standards and Technology and the National Science Foundation under Agreement No. DMR-1508249.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by the National Nuclear Security Administration’s Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development (NNSA DNN R&D).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, 87545, USA

    Mei Ding, Rex P. Hjelm, Marilyn E. Hawley, Erika M. Swanson & Chelsea W. Neil

  2. Environmental Management – Los Alamos Field Office, Los Alamos, NM, 87544, USA

    Mei Ding

  3. The New Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, NM, 87544, USA

    Rex P. Hjelm

  4. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, USA

    Aviva J. Sussman, Scott T. Broome & Jennifer E. Wilson

  5. NIST Center for Neutron Research, Gaithersburg, MD, 20878, USA

    John G. Barker

Authors
  1. Mei Ding
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rex P. Hjelm
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marilyn E. Hawley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aviva J. Sussman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Scott T. Broome
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jennifer E. Wilson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. John G. Barker
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Erika M. Swanson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chelsea W. Neil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.D. and R.P.H. conducted SANS experiments and analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. M.E.H. conducted SANS experiments. A.J.S., S.T.B., and J.E.W conducted supporting sample analysis. J.G.B. supported SANS experiments. E.M.S. contributed to writing the manuscript. C.W.N. finalized the manuscript and prepared Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chelsea W. Neil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, M., Hjelm, R.P., Hawley, M.E. et al. Characterization of volcanic tuff pores pre- and post-underground nuclear detonation using ultra-small and small angle neutron scattering. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40996-4

Download citation

  • Received: 01 December 2025

  • Accepted: 17 February 2026

  • Published: 21 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40996-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Neutron scattering
  • Tuff
  • Porosity
  • Pore structure
  • Underground nuclear explosion
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing