Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Mutational profiles of spontaneous and radiation-related mammary carcinomas in a rat model of Brca1 haploinsufficiency
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 February 2026

Mutational profiles of spontaneous and radiation-related mammary carcinomas in a rat model of Brca1 haploinsufficiency

  • Yuzuki Nakamura1,2,3,
  • Kazuhiro Daino1,4,
  • Atsuko Ishikawa1,
  • Shizuko Kakinuma1,5,
  • Yukiko Nishimura-Yano1,
  • Kento Nagata1,4,
  • Masaru Takabatake1,2,
  • Mayumi Nishimura1,
  • Tomoji Mashimo6,
  • Kazumasa Inoue2 &
  • …
  • Tatsuhiko Imaoka1,2,4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Genetics
  • Molecular biology
  • Oncology

Abstract

Female carriers of a heterozygous germline mutation in BRCA1/2 have a high risk of breast cancer. Although recent research has suggested that genomic instability via BRCA1/2 haploinsufficiency contributes to the early phase of BRCA-associated carcinogenesis, insights into the role of BRCA haploinsufficiency in carcinogenesis are lacking. We previously reported that the Brca1L63X/+ rat, a model of Brca1 haploinsufficiency carcinogenesis, exhibits a significantly higher incidence of mammary carcinomas than wild-type rats exposed to ionizing radiation; notably, the carcinomas retained a wild-type Brca1 allele. To explore the mutation spectrum underlying Brca1 haploinsufficiency, we performed whole-exome sequencing of spontaneous and radiation-associated mammary carcinomas in wild-type and Brca1L63X/+ rats. Mammary tumors from wild-type and Brca1L63X/+ rats did not differ significantly regarding the number of somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (InDels), or frequency of copy-number variants (CNVs). The radiation-associated carcinomas of Brca1L63X/+ rats had significantly fewer identifiable cancer-driver mutations induced by SNVs and InDels than those of wild-type rats; moreover, irradiated Brca1L63X/+ rats tended to have more carcinomas with no detectable cancer-driver mutations via SNVs, InDels or CNVs. Thus, Brca1 haploinsufficiency contributes to breast carcinogenesis by bypassing the generation of cancer-driver mutations that would otherwise occur via accumulation of nonsynonymous mutations and CNVs.

Data availability

The DNA sequences generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession number PRJDB35787. Other data used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Inagaki-Kawata, Y. et al. Genetic and clinical landscape of breast cancers with germline BRCA1/2 variants. Commun. Biol. 3, 578. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01301-9 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tung, N. et al. Frequency of germline mutations in 25 cancer susceptibility genes in a sequential series of patients with breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1460–1468. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.0747 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Momozawa, Y. et al. Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7,051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls. Nat. Commun. 9, 4083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06581-8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer, J. R. et al. Contribution of germline predisposition gene mutations to breast cancer risk in African American women. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 112, 1213–1221. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaa040 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Momozawa, Y. et al. Expansion of cancer risk profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants. JAMA Oncol. 8, 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0476 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuchenbaecker, K. B. et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. JAMA 317, 2402–2416. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.7112 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida, K. & Miki, Y. Role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 as regulators of DNA repair, transcription, and cell cycle in response to DNA damage. Cancer Sci. 95, 866–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2004.tb02195.x (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andrieu, N. et al. Effect of chest X-rays on the risk of breast cancer among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the international BRCA1/2 carrier cohort study: A report from the EMBRACE, GENEPSO, GEO-HEBON, and IBCCS Collaborators’ Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 3361–3366. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3126 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pijpe, A. et al. Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: Retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK). BMJ 345, e5660. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5660 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drooger, J. C. et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic ionizing radiation and the risk of a first and second primary breast cancer, with special attention for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a critical review of the literature. Cancer Treat. Rev. 41, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.12.002 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Barele, M. et al. Contralateral breast cancer risk in patients with breast cancer and a germline-BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant undergoing radiation. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 115, 1318–1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djad116 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Minello, A. & Carreira, A. BRCA1/2 Haploinsufficiency: Exploring the Impact of Losing one Allele. J. Mol. Biol. 168277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168277 (2023).

  14. Maxwell, K. N. et al. BRCA locus-specific loss of heterozygosity in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Nat. Commun. 8, 319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00388-9 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goggins, M. et al. Germline BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic carcinomas. Cancer Res. 56, 5360–5364 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. King, T. A. et al. Heterogenic loss of the wild-type BRCA allele in human breast tumorigenesis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 14, 2510–2518. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9372-1 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Martins, F. C. et al. Evolutionary pathways in BRCA1-associated breast tumors. Cancer Discov. 2, 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0325 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Konishi, H. et al. Mutation of a single allele of the cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 leads to genomic instability in human breast epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 108, 17773–17778. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110969108 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vaclova, T. et al. DNA repair capacity is impaired in healthy BRCA1 heterozygous mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 152, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3459-3 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Evers, B. & Jonkers, J. Mouse models of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency: Past lessons, current understanding and future prospects. Oncogene 25, 5885–5897. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209871 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Drost, R. M. & Jonkers, J. Preclinical mouse models for BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 101, 1651–1657. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605350 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diaz-Cruz, E. S., Cabrera, M. C., Nakles, R., Rutstein, B. H. & Furth, P. A. BRCA1 deficient mouse models to study pathogenesis and therapy of triple negative breast cancer. Breast Dis. 32, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-2010-0308 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamura, Y. et al. Brca1L63X /+ rat is a novel model of human BRCA1 deficiency displaying susceptibility to radiation-induced mammary cancer. Cancer Sci. 113, 3362–3375. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15485 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Imaoka, T. et al. Influence of age on the relative biological effectiveness of carbon ion radiation for induction of rat mammary carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 85, 1134–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.035 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Behjati, S. et al. Mutational signatures of ionizing radiation in second malignancies. Nat. Commun. 7, 12605. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12605 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Farmanbar, A., Firouzi, S., Kneller, R. & Khiabanian, H. Mutational signatures reveal ternary relationships between homologous recombination repair, APOBEC, and mismatch repair in gynecological cancers. J. Transl. Med. 20, 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03259-0 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Imaoka, T. et al. High relative biologic effectiveness of carbon ion radiation on induction of rat mammary carcinoma and its lack of H-ras and Tp53 mutations. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 69, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.026 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moriyama, H. et al. Exome of radiation-induced rat mammary carcinoma shows copy-number losses and mutations in human-relevant cancer genes. Anticancer Res. 41, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14751 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Alexandrov, L. B. et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature 578, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1943-3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers. Cell 149, 979–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.024 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences. Nature 534, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17676 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kocakavuk, E. et al. Radiotherapy is associated with a deletion signature that contributes to poor outcomes in patients with cancer. Nat. Genet. 53, 1088–1096. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00874-3 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lopez-Otin, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell 186, 243–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, C. M. et al. Brca1 haploinsufficiency promotes early tumor onset and epigenetic alterations in a mouse model of hereditary breast cancer. Nat. Genet. 56, 2763–2775. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01958-6 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sedic, M. et al. Haploinsufficiency for BRCA1 leads to cell-type-specific genomic instability and premature senescence. Nat. Commun. 6, 7505. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8505 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rennstam, K. et al. Genomic alterations in histopathologically normal breast tissue from BRCA1 mutation carriers may be caused by BRCA1 haploinsufficiency. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 49, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.20723 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, C. M. et al. BRCA1 mutation promotes sprouting angiogenesis in inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblast of triple-negative breast cancer. Cell. Death Discov. 10 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01768-5 (2024).

  38. Nee, K. et al. Preneoplastic stromal cells promote BRCA1-mediated breast tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 55, 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-023-01298-x (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wolff, A. C. et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 3997–4013. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.50.9984 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. H., L. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).

  41. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giab008 (2021).

  42. Van der Auwera, G. A. O. C. B. Genomics in the Cloud: Using docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra (1st Edition). (O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2020).

  43. Koboldt, D. C. et al. VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 568–576. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.129684.111 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. (Austin) 6, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Boeva, V. et al. Control-FREEC: A tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr670 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Manders, F. et al. MutationalPatterns: The one stop shop for the analysis of mutational processes. BMC Genom. 23, 134. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-022-08357-3 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tate, J. G. et al. COSMIC: The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1015 (2019).

  48. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.. https://www.R-project.org/ (2020).

  49. Terry, M. & Therneau, P. M. G. Modeling survival data: Extending the cox model (Springer, New York, 2000).

  50. Schneider, G. & Becvarik, C. E. R. NSM3: Functions and Datasets to Accompany Hollander, Wolfe, and Chicken - Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Third Edition. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=NSM3 (2024).

  51. Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., van de Wiel, M. A. V. & Zeileis, A. Implementing a class of permutation tests: The coin package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–23 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Masami Ootawara, Misuzu Fujita, Mari Ogawa, Hitomi Seo, Hitomi Moriyama, Jo Kubota, Ken-ichi Kudo, Daisuke Iizuka, Yi Shang, Takahiro Hamoya, Hiromi Yanagihara, and the staff at the Department of Radiation Effects Research and the Laboratory Animal and Bioresource Sciences Section of QST for technical support.

Funding

Declaration. The study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Grant Numbers JP21H03601 and JP25H01188 to T.I., JP21H04932 and JP24H00764 to S.K. and K.D. Y.N. was supported by JSPS fellowship (Grant Number JP25KJ2002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Effects Research, Institute for Radiological Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan

    Yuzuki Nakamura, Kazuhiro Daino, Atsuko Ishikawa, Shizuko Kakinuma, Yukiko Nishimura-Yano, Kento Nagata, Masaru Takabatake, Mayumi Nishimura & Tatsuhiko Imaoka

  2. Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Human Health Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan

    Yuzuki Nakamura, Masaru Takabatake, Kazumasa Inoue & Tatsuhiko Imaoka

  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Fellow, DC, Tokyo, Japan

    Yuzuki Nakamura

  4. Institute for Quantum Life Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan

    Kazuhiro Daino, Kento Nagata & Tatsuhiko Imaoka

  5. Department of Radiobiology, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Aomori, Japan

    Shizuko Kakinuma

  6. Laboratory Animal Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Tomoji Mashimo

Authors
  1. Yuzuki Nakamura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuhiro Daino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atsuko Ishikawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shizuko Kakinuma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yukiko Nishimura-Yano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kento Nagata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masaru Takabatake
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mayumi Nishimura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tomoji Mashimo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kazumasa Inoue
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tatsuhiko Imaoka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.N., D.K., S.K. and T.I. wrote the main manuscript text. Y.N. prepared all figures and tables and performed formal analysis. Y.N., K.D., A.I., S.K., Y.N-Y., K.N., M.T. and M.N. performed the experiments. M.T., K.I. and T.I. supervised Y.N. on this project. T.M. provided the rat model used in this study. T.I. conceptualized and managed the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuhiko Imaoka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Protocols for animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (approval numbers 07-1016, 14-1021 and 16-1034).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakamura, Y., Daino, K., Ishikawa, A. et al. Mutational profiles of spontaneous and radiation-related mammary carcinomas in a rat model of Brca1 haploinsufficiency. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41240-9

Download citation

  • Received: 15 July 2025

  • Accepted: 18 February 2026

  • Published: 24 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41240-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • BRCA1
  • Breast cancer
  • Haploinsufficiency
  • Radiation
  • Whole-exome sequencing
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer