Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Unveiling in situ oxygen, carbon and nutrient cycling of a sponge-driven biological hotspot in the arctic
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 February 2026

Unveiling in situ oxygen, carbon and nutrient cycling of a sponge-driven biological hotspot in the arctic

  • Ulrike Hanz1,2,
  • Benjamin Mueller3,4,
  • Martijn C. Bart3,
  • Kathrin Busch5,6,
  • Gert-Jan Reichart1,7,
  • Hans Tore Rapp8,
  • Jasper M. de Goeij3 &
  • …
  • Furu Mienis1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biogeochemistry
  • Climate sciences
  • Ecology
  • Environmental sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Ocean sciences

Abstract

Deep-sea sponge grounds are habitat-forming benthic communities characterized by high biomass and structural complexity. Despite their ecological significance, their role for the deep-sea environment remains poorly understood and their functioning is often inferred from ex situ studies. We hypothesized that deep-sea sponge grounds exhibit substantially higher respiration and nutrient turnover than surrounding soft sediments, making them hotspots of carbon and nutrient cycling in the deep sea. Integrated respiration and nutrient cycling were quantified in a sponge ground on the summit of an Arctic seamount (Schulz Bank, ~ 580 m depth). We used in-situ incubation chambers measuring oxygen consumption, prokaryotic cell removal, and inorganic nutrient fluxes. Respiration rates ranged from 0.13 to 0.93 mmol O₂ m⁻² h⁻¹, which is comparable to cold-water coral reefs and up to 7–21 times higher than reported for soft sediments of the Arctic deep sea. This indicates a high organic carbon demand exceeding surface-derived supply, suggesting the uptake of additional food resources. All incubations showed net release of ammonium, phosphate, nitrite and nitrate, with fluxes correlating with sponge biomass. Our results demonstrate that deep-sea sponge grounds function as hotspots of carbon and nutrient cycling and suggest distinct functional contributions of sponge groups and their microbiome.

Data availability

The data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Klitgaard, A. B. & Tendal, O. S. Distribution and species composition of mass occurrences of large-sized sponges in the northeast Atlantic. Prog Oceanogr. 61, 57–98 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts, J. M., Wheeler, A. J. & Freiwald, A. Reefs of the Deep: The Biology and Geology of Cold-Water Coral Ecosystems. Science 312, 543–547 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bart, M. C., Hudspith, M., Rapp, H. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M. & de Goeij, J. M. A Deep-Sea Sponge Loop? Sponges Transfer Dissolved and Particulate Organic Carbon and Nitrogen to Associated Fauna. Front Mar. Sci 8, 604879 (2021).

  4. Hanz, U. et al. The important role of sponges in carbon and nitrogen cycling in a deep-sea biological hotspot. Funct. Ecol. 36, 2188–2199 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maldonado, M. et al. Massive silicon utilization facilitated by a benthic-pelagic coupled feedback sustains deep-sea sponge aggregations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 66, 366–391 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, E. M. et al. Occurrence records of Geodia species (Porifera, Demospongiae, Tetractinellida) from the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans. PANGAEA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.924531

  7. Hawkes, N. et al. Glass sponge grounds on the Scotian Shelf and their associated biodiversity. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 614, 91–109 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vafeiadou, A., Fragkopoulou, E. & Assis, J. A global dataset of demosponge distribution records. Data Brief. 53, 110200 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, F. et al. Can Environmental Conditions at North Atlantic Deep-Sea Habitats Be Predicted Several Years Ahead? ——Taking Sponge Habitats as an Example. Front Mar. Sci 8, 703297 (2021).

  10. Tabachnick, K. R., Van Soest, R., van Kempen Th, M. & Braekamn, J. Distribution of recent Hexactinellida in Sponges in Time and Space(eds van Soest, R. et al.) 225–232 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1994).

  11. Maldonado, M. et al. Sponge grounds as key marine habitats: a synthetic review of types, structure, functional roles, and conservation concerns inMarine Animal Forests(eds Rossi, S. et al.) (Springer, Cham, 2017).

  12. Hogg, M. M. et al. Deep-sea sponge grounds: reservoirs of biodiversity. UNEP-WCMC Biodivers. Ser. 32, 1–86 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meyer, H. K., Roberts, E. M., Rapp, H. T. & Davies, A. J. Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery. Deep Sea Res. Part. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 153, 103137 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weisz, J. B., Lindquist, N. & Martens, C. S. Do associated microbial abundances impact marine demosponge pumping rates and tissue densities? Oecologia 155, 367–376 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yahel, G., Whitney, F., Reiswig, H. M., Eerkes-Medrano, D. I. & Leys, S. P. In situ feeding and metabolism of glass sponges (Hexactinellida, Porifera) studied in a deep temperate fjord with a remotely operated submersible. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 428–440 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morganti, T. M., Ribes, M., Yahel, G. & Coma, R. Size Is the Major Determinant of Pumping Rates in Marine Sponges. Front. Physiol. 10, 1474 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kahn, A. S., Yahel, G., Chu, J. W. F., Tunnicliffe, V. & Leys, S. P. Benthic grazing and carbon sequestration by deep-water glass sponge reefs: Deep-water glass sponge reefs. Limnol. Oceanogr. 60, 78–88 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leys, S. P., Kahn, A. S., Fang, J. K. H., Kutti, T. & Bannister, R. J. Phagocytosis of microbial symbionts balances the carbon and nitrogen budget for the deep-water boreal sponge Geodia barretti. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 187–202 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hansell, D. A., Carlson, C. A., Repeta, D. J. & Schlitzer, R. Dissolved organic matter in the ocean: A controversy stimulates new insights. Oceanography 22, 202–211 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bart, M. C. et al. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is essential to balance the metabolic demands of four dominant North-Atlantic deep‐sea sponges. Limnol. Oceanogr. 66, 925–938 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bart, M. C. et al. Differential processing of dissolved and particulate organic matter by deep-sea sponges and their microbial symbionts. Sci. Rep. 10, 17515 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olinger, L. K., Strangman, W. K., McMurray, S. E. & Pawlik, J. R. Sponges With Microbial Symbionts Transform Dissolved Organic Matter and Take Up Organohalides. Front Mar. Sci 8, 665789 (2021).

  23. Maier, S. R. et al. Recycling pathways in cold-water coral reefs: Use of dissolved organic matter and bacteria by key suspension feeding taxa. Sci. Rep. 10, 9942 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rix, L. et al. Coral mucus fuels the sponge loop in warm-and cold-water coral reef ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 6, 18715 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, M. W., Radax, R., Steger, D. & Wagner, M. Sponge-Associated Microorganisms: Evolution, Ecology, and Biotechnological Potential. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 295–347 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maldonado, M. et al. A Microbial Nitrogen Engine Modulated by Bacteriosyncytia in Hexactinellid Sponges: Ecological Implications for Deep-Sea Communities. Front Mar. Sci 8, 638505 (2021).

  27. Busch, K. et al. Biodiversity, environmental drivers, and sustainability of the global deep-sea sponge microbiome. Nat. Commun. 13, 5160 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hentschel, U. et al. Microbial Diversity of Marine Sponges. in Sponges (Porifera) (ed Müller, W. E. G.) vol. 37 59–88 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  29. De Kluijver, A. et al. An integrative model of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in a common deep-sea sponge (Geodia barretti). Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 596251 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Garritano, A. N. et al. Species-specific relationships between deep sea sponges and their symbiotic Nitrosopumilaceae. ISME J. 17, 1517–1519 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Radax, R. et al. Metatranscriptomics of the marine sponge Geodia barretti: tackling phylogeny and function of its microbial community. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 1308–1324 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hudspith, M. et al. Quantifying sponge host and microbial symbiont contribution to dissolved organic matter uptake through cell separation. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 670, 1–13 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rix, L. et al. Heterotrophy in the earliest gut: a single-cell view of heterotrophic carbon and nitrogen assimilation in sponge-microbe symbioses. ISME J. 14, 2554–2567 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer, H. K. et al. Beyond the tip of the seamount: Distinct megabenthic communities found beyond the charismatic summit sponge ground on an arctic seamount (Schulz Bank, Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge). Deep Sea Res. Part. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 191, 103920 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hanz, U. et al. Long-term Observations Reveal Environmental Conditions and Food Supply Mechanisms at an Arctic Deep-Sea Sponge Ground. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans. 126, e2020JC016776 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roberts, E. M. et al. Oceanographic setting and short-timescale environmental variability at an Arctic seamount sponge ground. Deep Sea Res. Part. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 138, 98–113 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stratmann, T., Mevenkamp, L., Sweetman, A. K., Vanreusel, A. & Van Oevelen, D. Has phytodetritus processing by an abyssal soft-sediment community recovered 26 years after an experimental disturbance? Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 59 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brussaard, C. P. D. Optimization of Procedures for Counting Viruses by Flow Cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1506–1513 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yahel, G., Sharp, J. H., Marie, D., Häse2, C. & Genin, A. In situ feeding and element removal in the symbiont-bearing sponge Theonella swinhoei: Bulk DOC is the major source for carbon. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 141–149 (2003).

  40. Cathalot, C. et al. Cold-water coral reefs and adjacent sponge grounds: hotspots of benthic respiration and organic carbon cycling in the deep sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 2, 37 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tanioka, T. & Matsumoto, K. Stability of Marine Organic Matter Respiration Stoichiometry. Geophys Res. Lett 47 (1), e2019GL085564 (2020).

  42. Fukuda, R., Ogawa, H., Nagata, T. & Koike, I. Direct Determination of Carbon and Nitrogen Contents of Natural Bacterial Assemblages in Marine Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3352–3358 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Donis, D., McGinnis, D. F., Holtappels, M., Felden, J. & Wenzhoefer, F. Assessing benthic oxygen fluxes in oligotrophic deep sea sediments (HAUSGARTEN observatory). Deep Sea Res. Part. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 111, 1–10 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kutti, T., Bannister, R. J. & Fosså, J. H. Community structure and ecological function of deep-water sponge grounds in the Traenadypet MPA—Northern Norwegian continental shelf. Cont. Shelf Res. 69, 21–30 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wurz, E. et al. The Hexactinellid Deep-Water Sponge Vazella pourtalesii (Schmidt, 1870) (Rossellidae) Copes With Temporarily Elevated Concentrations of Suspended Natural Sediment. Front Mar. Sci 8, 611539 (2021).

  46. van Oevelen, D. et al. The cold-water coral community as hotspot of carbon cycling on continental margins: A food-web analysis from Rockall Bank (northeast Atlantic). Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 1829–1844 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  47. De Froe, E. et al. Benthic oxygen and nitrogen exchange on a cold-water coral reef in the North-East Atlantic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 665 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rovelli, L. et al. Benthic O2 uptake of two cold-water coral communities estimated with the non-invasive eddy correlation technique. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 525, 97–104 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Maier, S. R. et al. On the paradox of thriving cold-water coral reefs in the food-limited deep sea. Biol. Rev. 98, 1768–1795 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Andersson, J. H. et al. Respiration patterns in the deep ocean. Geophys Res. Lett 31, L03304 (2004).

  51. Ramirez-Llodra, E. et al. The emerging picture of a diverse deep Arctic Ocean seafloor: From habitats to ecosystems. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 12, 00140 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stratmann, T., Soetaert, K., Wei, C. L., Lin, Y. S. & Van Oevelen, D. The SCOC database, a large, open, and global database with sediment community oxygen consumption rates. Sci. Data. 6, 242 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Smith, C. R., De Leo, F. C., Bernardino, A. F., Sweetman, A. K. & Arbizu, P. M. Abyssal food limitation, ecosystem structure and climate change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 518–528 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mueller, B. et al. Natural Diet of Coral-Excavating Sponges Consists Mainly of Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC). PLOS ONE. 9, e90152 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. de Goeij, J. M., Berg, H., van van den, Oostveen, M. M., Epping, E. H. G. & van Duyl, F. C. Major bulk dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal by encrusting coral reef cavity sponges. Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 357, 139–151 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hanz, U. et al. Seasonal Variability in Near-bed Environmental Conditions in the Vazella pourtalesii Glass Sponge Grounds of the Scotian Shelf. Front Mar. Sci 7, 597682 (2021).

  57. Ward, B. B. et al. Ammonia-oxidizing bacterial community composition in estuarine and oceanic environments assessed using a functional gene microarray. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 2522–2538 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tang, W. et al. Database of nitrification and nitrifiers in the global ocean. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 15, 5039–5077 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pachiadaki, M. G. et al. Major role of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation. Science 358, 1046–1051 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hoffmann, F. et al. Complex nitrogen cycling in the sponge Geodia barretti. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 2228–2243 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Kumala, L. & Canfield, D. E. Contraction Dynamics and Respiration of Small Single-Osculum Explants of the Demosponge Halichondria panicea. Front Mar. Sci 5, 410 (2018).

  62. Stratmann, T. et al. Nutrient fluxes, oxygen consumption and fatty acid composition from deep-water demo- and hexactinellid sponges from New Zealand. Deep Sea Res. Part. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 214, 104416 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Maldonado, M., Bayer, K. & López-Acosta, M. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycling Through Marine Sponges: Physiology, Cytology, Genomics, and Ecological Implications. in Frontiers in Invertebrate Physiology: A Collection of Reviews (Apple Academic, 2024).

  64. Godwin, C. M. & Cotner, J. B. Aquatic heterotrophic bacteria have highly flexible phosphorus content and biomass stoichiometry. ISME J. 9, 2324–2327 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Thamdrup, B. & Dalsgaard, T. Production of N2 through Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation Coupled to Nitrate Reduction in Marine Sediments. Am. Soc. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.3.1312 (2002). -1318.2002.

    Google Scholar 

  66. De Goeij, J. M. et al. Surviving in a Marine Desert: The Sponge Loop Retains Resources Within Coral Reefs. Science 342, 108–110 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Busch, K. et al. On giant shoulders: how a seamount affects the microbial community composition of seawater and sponges. Biogeosciences 17, 3471–3486 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Chai, G., Li, J. & Li, Z. The interactive effects of ocean acidification and warming on bioeroding sponge Spheciospongia vesparium microbiome indicated by metatranscriptomics. Microbiol. Res. 278, 127542 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Maggioni, F. et al. Warm-adapted sponges resist thermal stress by reallocating carbon and nitrogen resources from cell turnover to somatic growth. Limnol. Oceanogr. 69, 976–991 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Strand, R. et al. The response of a boreal deep-sea sponge holobiont to acute thermal stress. Sci. Rep. 7, 1660 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Liu, W., Fedorov, A. V., Xie, S. P. & Hu, S. Climate impacts of a weakened Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in a warming climate. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4876 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sanni, S. et al. Environmental risk framework and research recommendations for SMS mining in the Norwegian Arctic mid-ocean ridge. Front Mar. Sci 12, 1651042 (2025).

  73. Wurz, E. et al. Adverse effects of crushed seafloor massive sulphide deposits on the boreal deep-sea sponge Geodia barretti Bowerbank, 1858 and its associated fauna. Deep Sea Res. Part. Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 208, 104311 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the crews and scientific parties of RV G. O. Sars cruise GS2017110 for their technical support. We thank Stig Vågenes and his ROV Ægir 6000 team for the exceptional skill and precision during the dives.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This research has been performed in the scope of the SponGES project, which received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 679849. I acknowledge support by the Open Access publication fund of Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz- Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ocean Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, The Netherlands

    Ulrike Hanz, Gert-Jan Reichart & Furu Mienis

  2. Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany

    Ulrike Hanz

  3. Department of Freshwater and Marine Ecology, University of Amsterdam, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Benjamin Mueller, Martijn C. Bart & Jasper M. de Goeij

  4. Department of Marine Ecology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    Benjamin Mueller

  5. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Kathrin Busch

  6. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    Kathrin Busch

  7. Faculty of Geosciences, Earth Sciences Department, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

    Gert-Jan Reichart

  8. Department of Biological Sciences and K.G. Jebsen Centre for Deep-Sea Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Hans Tore Rapp

Authors
  1. Ulrike Hanz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Mueller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martijn C. Bart
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kathrin Busch
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gert-Jan Reichart
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hans Tore Rapp
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jasper M. de Goeij
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Furu Mienis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

UH, BM, MB, JMG, FM designed the study. UH, BM, MB, JMG, FM, HTR participated in sampling. UH, BM, MB, JMG, FM conducted the incubations. KB did microbial analyses. HTR conducted sponge taxonomic analysis. UH performed the data analysis and visualization. UH wrote the manuscript. UH, BM, MB, JMG, FM, KB, GJR discussed the results, reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrike Hanz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanz, U., Mueller, B., Bart, M.C. et al. Unveiling in situ oxygen, carbon and nutrient cycling of a sponge-driven biological hotspot in the arctic. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41798-4

Download citation

  • Received: 11 October 2025

  • Accepted: 23 February 2026

  • Published: 26 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41798-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Deep-sea sponge grounds
  • in-situ incubation
  • nutrient cycling
  • respiration
  • benthic-pelagic coupling
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology