Table 6 Ordinal logistic regression analysis: status at follow-up according to qualitative motivational dimensions
From: Joining the Islamic State from France between 2014 and 2016: an observational follow-up study
ß estimate | Standard error | Z value | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Daeschland’ category | −1.027 | 0.541 | −1.8963 | 0.058 |
‘Fortress’ category | −1.716 | 0.933 | −1.8387 | 0.066 |
‘Lancelot’ category | −1.621 | 0.592 | −2.7385 | 0.006 |
‘Mother Teresa’ category | −0.094 | 0.623 | −0.1506 | 0.880 |
‘Suicidal’ category | −1.538 | 1.044 | −1.4730 | 0.141 |
‘Savior’ category | −0.277 | 0.712 | −0.3889 | 0.697 |
‘Zeus’ category | −1.763 | 0.650 | −2.7138 | 0.007 |
‘Sleeping Beauty’ category | Referential dimension | |||
Reached the IS vs. still radicalized | −3.112 | 0.486 | −6.4041 | <0.001 |
Still radicalized vs. disengaged | −2.099 | 0.442 | −4.7527 | <0.001 |
Disengaged vs. no longer radicalized | −1.334 | 0.423 | −3.166 | 0.001 |
