Table 17 Mediation analysis result.
From: Technical communication pedagogical model (TCPM) for Malaysian vocational colleges
β | Std. error | t-value | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Path a | ||||
Objective → English language proficiency | −0.062 | 0.096 | 0.646 | 0.259 |
Content of learning → English language proficiency | 0.403 | 0.103 | 3.911 | 0.000* |
Method → English language proficiency | 0.012 | 0.089 | 0.132 | 0.448 |
Assessment → English language proficiency | 0.270 | 0.089 | 3.033 | 0.001* |
Path b | ||||
English language proficiency → Technical communication | 0.231 | 0.085 | 2.720 | 0.003* |
Path c’ | ||||
Objective → Technical communication | 0.154 | 0.068 | 2.249 | 0.012** |
Content of learning → Technical communication | 0.186 | 0.101 | 1.852 | 0.032** |
Method → Technical communication | 0.043 | 0.082 | 0.522 | 0.301 |
Assessment → Technical communication | 0.316 | 0.075 | 4.196 | 0.000* |
Total effect | ||||
Objective → Technical communication | 0.140 | 0.077 | 1.809 | 0.035** |
Content of learning → Technical communication | 0.280 | 0.096 | 2.908 | 0.002* |
Method → Technical communication | 0.045 | 0.089 | 0.508 | 0.306 |
Assessment → Technical communication | 0.379 | 0.077 | 4.900 | 0.000* |
Indirect effect | ||||
Objective → English language proficiency → Technical communication | −0.0140 | 0.0260 | 0.560 | 0.288 |
Content of learning → English language proficiency → Technical communication | 0.0930 | 0.0390 | 2.376 | 0.009* |
Method → English language proficiency → Technical communication | 0.0030 | 0.0210 | 0.129 | 0.449 |
Assessment → English language proficiency → Technical communication | 0.0620 | 0.0330 | 1.875 | 0.030** |