Table 2 Respondents profiles and characteristics of their onsite sanitation systems as well as their emptying practices.

From: Perception management of non-sewered sanitation systems towards scheduled faecal sludge emptying behaviour change intervention

Characteristics

Description

#

% mean

Sex

Male

 

81

Female

 

19

Age

50–60 years above

 

39

31–49 years

 

40

20–30 years

 

21

Less than 20 years

 

-

Level of education

Non-formal

 

9

Primary

 

20

Secondary

 

15

Higher secondary

 

15

Tertiary

 

41

Livelihood

Formal employment

 

50

Farming

 

4

Remittances

 

5

Informal employment

 

41

Monthly income (USD)

1–100

 

24

101–200

 

24

201–300

 

33

301–400 and above

 

20

Place of residence

Planned residential area

 

53

Mixed-use area

 

34

Slum area

 

14

Duration of stay

10 years and above

 

76

5–9 years

 

11

Less than 5 years

 

13

Study demographic

Total number of OSS/NSS surveyed

80

 

Total number of households cover: (5 households per OSS/NSS x 80)

400

 

Total number of population of users of OSS/NSS: (5 households x 5 family members per OSS/NSS x 80)

2000

 

Type of OSS in use

Latrine on top of the drain

 

9

Pit latrine

 

15

Septic tank with soak-away pit

 

8

Septic tank with a direct connection to the drain

 

69

OSS/NSS emptying practices

Within the last 6 months

 

11

Within the last 12 months

 

12

Within the last 3 years

 

9

More than 3 years ago

 

23

Never emptied

 

48

Current emptying behaviour

Emptied after faecal sludge overflow

 

57

Emptied before faecal sludge overflow

 

43

OSS/NSS emptying methods

Manual emptying

 

64

Mechanical emptying

 

36

OSS/NSS effluent discharge points

Discharge to storm-water drains

 

66

Discharge into surrounding environment

 

34