Table 3 Theme 3 Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) priority questions.

From: An agenda for future Social Sciences and Humanities research on energy efficiency: 100 priority research questions

Question no.

Agreed SSH priority question

31

How do energy efficiency policies (e.g., energy pricing policies) affect everyday life for different groups, especially vulnerable groups and different gender identities?

32

How do different households and social groups understand energy efficiency and energy sufficiency in relation to their everyday lives and practices?

33

What are the emerging (disruptive) energy efficiency technologies that might significantly transform the ways people live and work?

34

What are the relationships between widespread uptake of energy efficiency improvements and changes in social practices of production and consumption?

35

How do new sociotechnical configurations of energy generation, and evolving systems of provision, relate to energy efficiency programmes; for example, what, if any, are the consequences of community-based energy schemes?

36

How do new technological energy efficiency measures interact with practices and infrastructures in consumers’ everyday lives; and how are citizen values, relationships, and institutions reshaped by these technological changes?

37

What unanticipated challenges and poor outcomes arise from a lack of ‘fit’ between new initiatives or technologies with everyday lives and practices; and how can these be addressed?

38

What are the roles of personal, cultural and site-specific factors in the success or failure of energy efficiency initiatives?

39

How can participatory design and co-creation approaches contribute to the development of energy efficiency solutions that work with, rather than against, practices in everyday settings?

40

What are the user profiles (time-use and electricity use) of energy ‘efficient’ appliances in real life; what rebound effects or unintended consequences are associated with these; and how can evidence on these inform better governance?

41

How is thermal comfort perception related to physiological, psychological and social influences; and how could understanding of these relationships help to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption in everyday life?

42

What insights do the Humanities provide about how to create ‘cultures of energy efficiency’ that go beyond the usual dominant focus on consumer choices and ethical concerns?

43

What are the conditions that facilitate the acceptance and pursuit of energy sufficiency (e.g., living in smaller spaces, avoiding mobility, reducing consumption) over energy efficiency; and how can these conditions be scaled-up across society?

44

How are energy efficiency and sufficiency affected by changes to everyday life through ongoing processes of digitalisation (including, e.g., smart technologies, artificial intelligence and big data); and how do digital tools designed to improve energy efficiency and sufficiency interact with everyday practices?