Fig. 6: The impact of Lag∆COVID-19 cases on ∆fraud cases for high vs. low pandemic stress subsamples. | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Fig. 6: The impact of Lag∆COVID-19 cases on ∆fraud cases for high vs. low pandemic stress subsamples.

From: Vulnerability and fraud: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic

Fig. 6

This figure corresponds to Table 3. The x-axis is LagCovid-19 cases, and the y-axis is ∆ Fraud cases. The line of High Pandemic Stress is drawn as follows. First, the product of the minimum of LagCovid-19 cases for the subsample of low pandemic stress times the coefficient on LagCovid-19 cases for the same subsample is obtained. For the control variables, we obtain the products of the means of the variables for the subsample times their corresponding coefficient. Then the summation of all the products, which is the value of predicted ∆ Fraud cases based on the minimum of LagCovid-19 cases for a subsample of low pandemic stress, is obtained. Second, the value of predicted ∆ Fraud cases based on the maximum of LagCovid-19 cases for the subsample of low pandemic stress is obtained in the same way as the minimum above, except that we use the product of the maximum of LagCovid-19 cases times the coefficient on LagCovid-19 cases. Third, we connect the two points between the values at minimum (min) and maximum (max) to form the line. The line of High Pandemic Stress is formed the same way as the line of Low Pandemic Stress, except that the coefficients and the values of the variables for the subsample of high pandemic stress (instead of low pandemic stress) are used.

Back to article page