Table 8 Bias reduction of private SSN model (after matching).

From: The role of public versus private social safety nets in mitigating the impact of shocks in rural Pakistan

Variable

Unmatched (U) Matched (M)

Mean

%Bias

% reduction in │bias│

t-test

V(T)/V(C)

Treated

Control

T

p > │t│

(Household head Age) ^2

U

2024.4

2347

−24.3

76.0

−2.36

0.018

1.13

M

2061.4

2138.8

−5.8

−0.41

0.684

1.22

Electricity connection

U

0.684

0.896

−53.9

90.1

−6.24

0.000

2.35*

M

0.674

0.695

−5.3

−0.31

0.756

1.04

Attempted to obtain loan

U

0.490

0.312

36.8

76.3

3.60

0.000

1.17

M

0.474

0.432

8.7

0.58

0.562

1.02

Age of household head

U

42.714

46.593

−28.2

68.8

−2.75

0.006

1.15

M

43.147

44.358

−8.8

−0.61

0.543

1.17

Household size

U

6.031

6.391

−11.8

73.7

−1.13

0.258

1.05

M

5.958

5.863

3.1

0.22

0.825

1.24

Punjab

U

0.306

0.813

−118.4

95.8

−12.08

0.000

1.41

M

0.316

0.337

−4.9

−0.31

0.758

0.97

Sindh

U

0.612

0.103

125.0

100.0

14.86

0.000

2.60*

M

0.600

0.600

0.0

0.00

1.000

1.00

KPK

U

0.082

0.084

−0.9

−736.7

−0.09

0.932

0.98

M

0.084

0.063

7.6

0.55

0.581

1.30

No. of large animals

U

0.714

0.932

−24.6

95.2

−2.23

0.026

0.81

M

0.705

0.695

1.2

0.10

0.924

1.56*

No. of small animals

U

1.306

1.196

12.7

80.9

1.26

0.208

1.23

M

1.284

1.305

−2.4

−0.17

0.868

1.17

Education of household head

U

3.704

3.320

8.5

−45.2

0.85

0.397

1.29

M

3.379

3.937

−12.3

−0.80

0.425

0.77

Pucca house

U

0.276

0.552

−58.3

100.0

−5.30

0.000

0.81

M

0.263

0.263

0.0

0.00

1.000

1.00

  1. *If variance ratio outside (0.67; 1.49) for U and (0.67; 1.50) for M.