Table 3 Definitions of farmers’ sustainable livelihood resilience types.
Period | Explanation |
---|---|
Stable promotion period | With strong and stable anti-risk ability, the elements of resilience can promote each other and achieve sustainable livelihood |
Benign promotion period | With strong anti-risk ability, the elements of resilience promote each other to form a virtuous circle, and gradually transition to a period of stable improvement |
Stagnation period | It has the strong anti-risk ability. Although the elements of resilience have no obvious defects, they are separated from each other, and the overall development has fallen into a bottleneck. Although the status quo can be maintained, it is not conducive to achieving long-term sustainable livelihoods |
Mild recession period | The ability to resist risks is poor, and there is a defect in one of the elements that make up resilience, which hinders the improvement of resilience, and the livelihood capacity begins to decline |
Severe recession period | The ability to resist risks is poor, two of the elements that make up resilience are flawed, development is severely hindered, and livelihoods are rapidly declining |
Chaotic period | Completely exposed to risk, inadequate capacity in all aspects, and sink deeper and deeper into a vicious circle |