Table 1 Results of interexpert consensus.

From: The benefits of tourism for rural community development

Indicator

% AGR

Median

SD

CV

A. Economic perspective

A1. Investment opportunities

77

4.0

0.74

0.18

A2. Increased income

72

4.0

0.71

0.19

A3. Employment opportunities

83

4.0

0.69

0.17

A4. Employment stability

72

4.0

0.65

0.17

A5. Tax revenue

72

4.0

0.81

0.21

A6. Entrepreneurial opportunities

77

4.5

0.75

0.17

A7. Economic resilience

72

4.0

0.75

0.20

A8. Strategic alliance

50

3.5

0.77

0.23

A9. Product diversification

72

4.0

0.71

0.20

A10. Business viability

72

4.0

0.74

0.18

B. Sociocultural perspective

B1. Quality of life & well-being

89

5.0

0.68

0.15

B2. Depopulation

89

4.5

0.68

0.16

B3. Social stability

72

4.0

0.83

0.23

B4. Culture & heritage preservation

72

4.0

0.71

0.18

B5. Restoration of historical buildings

77

4.0

0.63

0.16

B6. Community identity

83

4.5

0.75

0.17

B7. Community pride

72

4.0

0.91

0.24

B8. Community visibility

72

4.0

0.80

0.22

B9. Cultural integrity

72

4.0

0.75

0.10

C. Environmental perspective

C1. Natural environmental conservation

77

4.0

0.60

0.14

C2. Biodiversity

72

4.0

0.80

0.22

C3. Infrastructure

83

5.0

0.76

0.10

C4. Green chemistry

72

4.0

0.53

0.14

C5. Carbon neutrality

56

4.0

0.76

0.22

C6. Kept land unspoiled

72

4.0

0.80

0.22

C7. Kept land in family

83

4.0

0.85

0.20

C8. Environmental awareness

72

4.0

0.65

0.17

D. Leisure and educational perspective

D1. Ecological knowledge

83

4.0

0.66

0.16

D2. Green consumerism

77

4.0

0.66

0.16

D3. Technology skills and capabilities

77

4.0

0.49

0.12

D4. Leisure and recreational opportunities

83

4.5

0.75

0.17

D5. Health and food security

77

4.0

0.66

0.17

D6. Reducing mental health issues

77

4.0

0.65

0.15

D7. Nostalgia nurturing

72

4.0

0.75

0.18

  1. Cutoff points on a 5-point Likert scale: AGR ≥ 70%, median ≥ 4, SD ≤ 1, and CV ≤ 0.3.
  2. The italic values indicate that they are out of the cut-off point and should be rejected accordingly.